Computational mechanisms for context-based behavioral interventions: A large-scale analysis.

behavioral interventions computational modeling context effects decision-making

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 04 2022
Historique:
entrez: 4 4 2022
pubmed: 5 4 2022
medline: 5 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Choice context influences decision processes and is one of the primary determinants of what people choose. This insight has been used by academics and practitioners to study decision biases and to design behavioral interventions to influence and improve choices. We analyzed the effects of context-based behavioral interventions on the computational mechanisms underlying decision-making. We collected data from two large laboratory studies involving 19 prominent behavioral interventions, and we modeled the influence of each intervention using a leading computational model of choice in psychology and neuroscience. This allowed us to parametrize the biases induced by each intervention, to interpret these biases in terms of underlying decision mechanisms and their properties, to quantify similarities between interventions, and to predict how different interventions alter key choice outcomes. In doing so, we offer researchers and practitioners a theoretically principled approach to understanding and manipulating choice context in decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35377794
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114914119
pmc: PMC9169647
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2114914119

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : SES-1847794

Références

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):467-79
pubmed: 18464792
Front Neuroinform. 2013 Aug 02;7:14
pubmed: 23935581
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8
pubmed: 20835253
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:391-417
pubmed: 20809791
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;23(3):251-263
pubmed: 30630672
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 04;43:e1
pubmed: 30714890
Science. 2003 Nov 21;302(5649):1338-9
pubmed: 14631022
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34
pubmed: 17576283
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;13(3):219-35
pubmed: 19638628
Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720
pubmed: 14584987
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:53-85
pubmed: 18798706
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8
pubmed: 7455683
Cognition. 1993 Oct-Nov;49(1-2):11-36
pubmed: 8287671
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Aug;79(2):79-94
pubmed: 10433898
Psychol Bull. 1999 Mar;125(2):255-75
pubmed: 10087938
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
pubmed: 17014301
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):333-67
pubmed: 15065913
Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):530-543
pubmed: 28406376
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):118-25
pubmed: 17276130
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7889):478-483
pubmed: 34880497
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621
pubmed: 14744228
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
pubmed: 17600525

Auteurs

Wenjia Joyce Zhao (WJ)

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Aoife Coady (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Sudeep Bhatia (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Department of Marketing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Classifications MeSH