Timing of postpartum long acting, reversible contraception was not associated with 12-month removal rates in a large Medicaid sample.


Journal

Contraception
ISSN: 1879-0518
Titre abrégé: Contraception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0234361

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 13 09 2021
revised: 02 03 2022
accepted: 19 03 2022
pubmed: 5 4 2022
medline: 16 8 2022
entrez: 4 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine whether the timing of placement of long acting, reversible contraception (LARC) methods postpartum (immediate postpartum (IPP) or interval (within 6 months postpartum) is associated with higher removal rates by 12 months postpartum. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data (n = 313,849) from Oregon and South Carolina from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. Our primary outcome was LARC (intrauterine device (IUD) or implant) removal by 12 months postpartum. We compared crude proportions and rates of removal and used a multivariable survival analysis to compare removal over 12 months between IPP and interval LARC placement controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors and clustered at the woman level. Our sample included 313,849 births to 247,884 women; a majority did not receive any postpartum contraception (207,058 [66.0%]). Out of the 54,018 (17.2%) of births followed by an immediate postpartum or interval LARC placement, 11.8% discontinued by 12 months. In multivariable analyses, births followed by IPP LARC were 10% more likely to experience discontinuation at any point up to 12 months compared with interval LARC (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.22), but this was not statistically significant. IPP LARC devices are removed at similar rates as LARC placed within 6 months postpartum. Timing of postpartum long acting reversible contraception- interval or immediately postpartum- was not associated with 12 month removal rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35378084
pii: S0010-7824(22)00080-4
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

49-56

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Maria I Rodriguez (MI)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States. Electronic address: rodrigma@ohsu.edu.

Megan Skye (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.

Ghazaleh Samandari (G)

Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Blair G Darney (BG)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, United States; Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (INSP), Centro de Investigacion en Salud Poblacional (CISP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH