Radiological patterns of tumour progression in patients treated with a combination of immune checkpoint blockers and antiangiogenic drugs.


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 24 11 2021
revised: 19 02 2022
accepted: 22 02 2022
pubmed: 5 4 2022
medline: 4 5 2022
entrez: 4 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) in combination with antiangiogenic drugs showed synergistic efficacy in several tumour types. New patterns of progression have recently been defined upon treatment with ICB alone including atypical responses such as pseudoprogression (PsPD), dissociated response and hyperprogressive disease (HPD). This study aimed to describe the patterns of response observed in patients treated with combination ICB with antiangiogenic drugs. We conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis of patients (pts) enrolled in phase I trials at Gustave Roussy assessing the combination of ICB and antiangiogenic drugs. Radiological CT scans were centrally reviewed by a senior radiologist according to iRECIST criteria including progressive disease (PD), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). HPD was defined as a progression at the first evaluation with a delta tumour growth rate exceeding 50%. PsPD was defined as initial progression followed by stabilisation or decrease of tumour size, DisR as a concomitant size decrease in some tumour lesions and size increase in others. Both PsPD and DisR are defined as atypical responses. Overall response rate included PR and complete response (CR) and disease control rate included PR, CR and SD. Between December 2016 and June 2020, 111 pts were included. The median follow up was 12.8 months (11.3-15.1). The most common tumour types were lung and pleura (20%), kidney (18%) and bladder (17%). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 21.6% (n = 24) and 59% (n = 65), respectively. Twenty-one patients (19%) experienced PD as the best response. PsPD, DisR and HPD were observed in 4 (3.6%), 11 (9.9%) and 7 (6.3%) pts, respectively. DisR and PsPD were associated with longer iProgression Free Survival (median: 6.9 and 18.9 months, respectively) and iOverall Survival (median: 28.4 and 31.1 months, respectively) than a median of SD in immune progression-free survival (median: 4.2 months) and immune overall survival (median: 12.7 months). Patients treated with ICBs and antiangiogenic agents display atypical responses. Survival might be longer in patients with DisR responses and PsPD disease than patients with HPD, PD and SD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) in combination with antiangiogenic drugs showed synergistic efficacy in several tumour types. New patterns of progression have recently been defined upon treatment with ICB alone including atypical responses such as pseudoprogression (PsPD), dissociated response and hyperprogressive disease (HPD). This study aimed to describe the patterns of response observed in patients treated with combination ICB with antiangiogenic drugs.
METHODS
We conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis of patients (pts) enrolled in phase I trials at Gustave Roussy assessing the combination of ICB and antiangiogenic drugs. Radiological CT scans were centrally reviewed by a senior radiologist according to iRECIST criteria including progressive disease (PD), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). HPD was defined as a progression at the first evaluation with a delta tumour growth rate exceeding 50%. PsPD was defined as initial progression followed by stabilisation or decrease of tumour size, DisR as a concomitant size decrease in some tumour lesions and size increase in others. Both PsPD and DisR are defined as atypical responses. Overall response rate included PR and complete response (CR) and disease control rate included PR, CR and SD.
RESULTS
Between December 2016 and June 2020, 111 pts were included. The median follow up was 12.8 months (11.3-15.1). The most common tumour types were lung and pleura (20%), kidney (18%) and bladder (17%). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 21.6% (n = 24) and 59% (n = 65), respectively. Twenty-one patients (19%) experienced PD as the best response. PsPD, DisR and HPD were observed in 4 (3.6%), 11 (9.9%) and 7 (6.3%) pts, respectively. DisR and PsPD were associated with longer iProgression Free Survival (median: 6.9 and 18.9 months, respectively) and iOverall Survival (median: 28.4 and 31.1 months, respectively) than a median of SD in immune progression-free survival (median: 4.2 months) and immune overall survival (median: 12.7 months).
CONCLUSION
Patients treated with ICBs and antiangiogenic agents display atypical responses. Survival might be longer in patients with DisR responses and PsPD disease than patients with HPD, PD and SD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35378410
pii: S0959-8049(22)00122-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.024
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

42-53

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: As part of the Drug Development Department (DITEP): Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen-X Bvba, Arno Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, BicycleTx Ltd, Bioalliance Pharma, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Cullinan-Apollo, Curevarc, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Iteos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merus, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Onyx Therapeutics, Orion Pharma, Oryzon Genomics, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre Medicament, Plexxikon, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor. Research Grants from Astrazeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, INCA, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Non-financial support (drug supplied) from Astrazeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boringher Ingelheim, GSK, Medimmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer, Roche. T.Assi and S.Ammari have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

Auteurs

Emeline Guiard (E)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: emelineguiard@gmail.com.

Capucine Baldini (C)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Cédric Pobel (C)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Tarek Assi (T)

Department of Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Alice Bernard-Tessier (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Patricia Martin-Romano (P)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Antoine Hollebecque (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Loïc Verlingue (L)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Arthur Geraud (A)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Jean-Marie Michot (JM)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Jean-Pierre Armand (JP)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Jean-Charles Soria (JC)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Christophe Massard (C)

Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Samy Ammari (S)

Department of Radiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Biomaps, UMR1281 INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, F-94805, France; ELSAN Department of Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie Paris Nord, Sarcelles, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH