C5 Palsy of Patients with Proximal-Type Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy.
C5 palsy
Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy
Radiological findings
Sagittal vertical axis
T1 slope
Journal
Asian spine journal
ISSN: 1976-1902
Titre abrégé: Asian Spine J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101314177
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
26
05
2021
accepted:
29
07
2021
pubmed:
6
4
2022
medline:
6
4
2022
entrez:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An observational cohort study design was adopted in this study. This study was designed to investigate preoperative factors that predict poor outcomes following surgery in patients with proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (PCSA) using radiological findings. We evaluated the preoperative factors associated with poor outcomes using electrophysiological and neurological findings. However, the preoperative factors associated with poor outcomes remained unclear. Sixty patients with PCSA who underwent surgical treatment of the cervical spine were enrolled. The radiological findings on plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated. The cervical lordotic angles, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope were assessed on a lateral radiograph in the neutral position. CT was used to assess the width of the intervertebral foramen and the anterior protrusion of the superior articular process on the axial view. MRI was used to determine the number of levels of compression (NLC) and the presence of a high-intensity area in the spinal cord in the T2- weighted midsagittal view. The preoperative and postoperative strengths of the most atrophic muscles were evaluated using manual muscle testing. Improvements in strength were classified as excellent (five grades recovered), good (more than one grade recovered), fair (no improvement), or poor (worsened). The prevalence of C5 palsy was 17% (10/60). Patients with poor outcomes had higher NLC and Δ C2-C7 SVA than patients with excellent, good, and fair outcomes (p =0.015; odds ratio [OR], 5.758; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.397-23.726 for a change of 10% and p =0.048; OR, 1.068; 95% CI, 0.992-1.141 for a change of 10%, respectively). ΔC2-C7 SVA and NLC may be used as prognostic factors for achieving a poor outcome following surgery in patients with PCSA. More focus is needed on preventing the increase in ΔC2-C7 SVA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35378575
pii: asj.2021.0210
doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0210
pmc: PMC9633242
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
723-731Références
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):156-61
pubmed: 23001450
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;174:29-35
pubmed: 30195898
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jul;19(5):358-61
pubmed: 16826009
Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec;24(12):2724-34
pubmed: 26281981
Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(3):266-271
pubmed: 31192093
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):104-112
pubmed: 27473211
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1045-50
pubmed: 24880218
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):E328-34
pubmed: 22146283
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e687-e693
pubmed: 31279919
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1702-10
pubmed: 20461418
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 15;28(24):2667-72
pubmed: 14673367
Spinal Cord. 2020 Mar;58(3):348-355
pubmed: 31745245
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):909-15
pubmed: 24120145
Spinal Cord. 2014 May;52(5):364-7
pubmed: 24614851
Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2293-2301
pubmed: 31037421
Neurosurgery. 2014 Jun;74(6):595-604; discussion 604-5
pubmed: 24561867
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):E286-96
pubmed: 22020584
J Neurosurg. 1966 Jul;25(1):57-66
pubmed: 5947048
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):586-92
pubmed: 19956033
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):393-400
pubmed: 20190311
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):E990-3
pubmed: 19092610