Novel Negative Pressure Procedural Tent Reduces Aerosolized Particles in a Simulated Prehospital Setting.


Journal

Prehospital and disaster medicine
ISSN: 1945-1938
Titre abrégé: Prehosp Disaster Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8918173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 6 4 2022
medline: 20 5 2022
entrez: 5 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the ability of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers to maintain personal safety during the treatment and transport of patients potentially infected. Increased rates of COVID-19 infection in EMS providers after patient care exposure, and notably after performing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), have been reported. With an already strained workforce seeing rising call volumes and increased risk for AGP-requiring patient presentations, development of novel devices for the protection of EMS providers is of great importance.Based on the concept of a negative pressure room, the AerosolVE BioDome is designed to encapsulate the patient and contain aerosolized infectious particles produced during AGPs, making the cabin of an EMS vehicle safer for providers. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the tent in mitigating simulated infectious particle spread in varied EMS transport platforms during AGP utilization. Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled and distributed amongst three EMS vehicles: a ground ambulance, an aeromedical-configured helicopter, and an aeromedical-configured jet. Sodium chloride particles were used to simulate infectious particles and particle counts were obtained in numerous locations close to the tent and around the patient compartment. Counts near the tent were compared to ambient air with and without use of AGPs (non-rebreather mask, continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] mask, and high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC]). For all transport platforms, with the tent fan off, the particle generator alone, and with all AGPs produced particle counts inside the tent significantly higher than ambient particle counts (P <.0001). With the tent fan powered on, particle counts near the tent, where EMS providers are expected to be located, showed no significant elevation compared to baseline ambient particle counts during the use of the particle generator alone or with use of any of the AGPs across all transport platforms. Development of devices to improve safety for EMS providers to allow for use of all available therapies to treat patients while reducing risk of communicable respiratory disease transmission is of paramount importance. The AerosolVE BioDome demonstrated efficacy in creating a negative pressure environment and workspace around the patient and provided significant filtration of simulated respiratory droplets, thus making the confined space of transport vehicles potentially safer for EMS personnel.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the ability of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers to maintain personal safety during the treatment and transport of patients potentially infected. Increased rates of COVID-19 infection in EMS providers after patient care exposure, and notably after performing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), have been reported. With an already strained workforce seeing rising call volumes and increased risk for AGP-requiring patient presentations, development of novel devices for the protection of EMS providers is of great importance.Based on the concept of a negative pressure room, the AerosolVE BioDome is designed to encapsulate the patient and contain aerosolized infectious particles produced during AGPs, making the cabin of an EMS vehicle safer for providers. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the tent in mitigating simulated infectious particle spread in varied EMS transport platforms during AGP utilization.
METHODS METHODS
Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled and distributed amongst three EMS vehicles: a ground ambulance, an aeromedical-configured helicopter, and an aeromedical-configured jet. Sodium chloride particles were used to simulate infectious particles and particle counts were obtained in numerous locations close to the tent and around the patient compartment. Counts near the tent were compared to ambient air with and without use of AGPs (non-rebreather mask, continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] mask, and high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC]).
RESULTS RESULTS
For all transport platforms, with the tent fan off, the particle generator alone, and with all AGPs produced particle counts inside the tent significantly higher than ambient particle counts (P <.0001). With the tent fan powered on, particle counts near the tent, where EMS providers are expected to be located, showed no significant elevation compared to baseline ambient particle counts during the use of the particle generator alone or with use of any of the AGPs across all transport platforms.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Development of devices to improve safety for EMS providers to allow for use of all available therapies to treat patients while reducing risk of communicable respiratory disease transmission is of paramount importance. The AerosolVE BioDome demonstrated efficacy in creating a negative pressure environment and workspace around the patient and provided significant filtration of simulated respiratory droplets, thus making the confined space of transport vehicles potentially safer for EMS personnel.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35379372
pii: S1049023X22000474
doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000474
pmc: PMC9118043
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aerosolized Particles and Droplets 0
Aerosols 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

383-389

Références

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):P13-P14
pubmed: 32795140
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):707-713
pubmed: 32958477
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Oct;33(2):597-603
pubmed: 32770341
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Jul 1;24(7):737-739
pubmed: 32718412
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:354-356
pubmed: 33546955
Elife. 2020 Apr 02;9:
pubmed: 32228860
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Jul 1;24(7):740-743
pubmed: 32718413
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;77(1):19-31
pubmed: 32788066
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Nov 09;1(6):1205-1213
pubmed: 33392524
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Jun 6;52(RR-10):1-42
pubmed: 12836624
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):472-476
pubmed: 32298249
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;27(9):2340-2348
pubmed: 34197282

Auteurs

Nathaniel Hunt (N)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Spencer Masiewicz (S)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, Georgia USA.

Logan Herbert (L)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Benjamin Bassin (B)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Christine Brent (C)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Nathan L Haas (NL)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Mohamad Hakam Tiba (MH)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Jon Lillemoen (J)

University of Michigan Environment, Health and Safety, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Mark J Lowell (MJ)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Isabel Lott (I)

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Matthew Basinger (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Graham Smith (G)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Kevin R Ward (KR)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MichiganUSA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH