Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations: a qualitative interview study.

Empathy Primary Health Care general practitioners optimism physician–patient relations qualitative research

Journal

BJGP open
ISSN: 2398-3795
Titre abrégé: BJGP Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101713531

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 25 11 2021
revised: 07 03 2022
accepted: 30 03 2022
pubmed: 6 4 2022
medline: 6 4 2022
entrez: 5 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Practitioner expressions of optimism and empathy may improve treatment engagement, adherence, and patient satisfaction but are not delivered consistently amid the challenges of everyday clinical practice. To explore primary care practitioner (PCP) views about optimistic and empathic communication in consultations; and to identify behavioural, attitudinal, and/or contextual issues likely to encourage or deter PCPs from practising such communication. Qualitative interview study with 20 PCPs (GPs, practice nurses, and primary care physiotherapists). Semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 PCPs. Data were analysed thematically. A conceptual mismatch between optimism and patient expectations became apparent; when asked how PCPs communicate about the likely effects of a treatment, answers were focussed around managing patient expectations. When prompted, it became clear PCPs were open to communicating optimistically with patients, but emphasised the need for realism. Concerns arose that patients may not be receptive to optimistic messages, especially when holding negative expectations. PCPs felt that expressing empathy is fundamental to all clinical consultations, noting that it can be challenging. Some PCPs worried that increasing expressions of empathy might increase their risk of clinician burnout and felt guilty about (appropriately) communicating empathy while maintaining some emotional distance. PCPs agreed expressing realistic optimism during consultations could aid communication and would constitute a novel change to practice. PCPs strive for clinical empathy but can struggle to manage emotional self-protection. Specific training to help PCPs express realistic optimism and empathy, and better utilise efficient non-verbal skills could help these issues.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Practitioner expressions of optimism and empathy may improve treatment engagement, adherence, and patient satisfaction but are not delivered consistently amid the challenges of everyday clinical practice.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To explore primary care practitioner (PCP) views about optimistic and empathic communication in consultations; and to identify behavioural, attitudinal, and/or contextual issues likely to encourage or deter PCPs from practising such communication.
DESIGN & SETTING METHODS
Qualitative interview study with 20 PCPs (GPs, practice nurses, and primary care physiotherapists).
METHOD METHODS
Semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 PCPs. Data were analysed thematically.
RESULTS RESULTS
A conceptual mismatch between optimism and patient expectations became apparent; when asked how PCPs communicate about the likely effects of a treatment, answers were focussed around managing patient expectations. When prompted, it became clear PCPs were open to communicating optimistically with patients, but emphasised the need for realism. Concerns arose that patients may not be receptive to optimistic messages, especially when holding negative expectations. PCPs felt that expressing empathy is fundamental to all clinical consultations, noting that it can be challenging. Some PCPs worried that increasing expressions of empathy might increase their risk of clinician burnout and felt guilty about (appropriately) communicating empathy while maintaining some emotional distance.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
PCPs agreed expressing realistic optimism during consultations could aid communication and would constitute a novel change to practice. PCPs strive for clinical empathy but can struggle to manage emotional self-protection. Specific training to help PCPs express realistic optimism and empathy, and better utilise efficient non-verbal skills could help these issues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35379688
pii: BJGPO.2021.0221
doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221
pmc: PMC9680746
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022, The Authors.

Références

JAMA. 2005 Mar 2;293(9):1100-6
pubmed: 15741532
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e76-84
pubmed: 23336477
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):240-5
pubmed: 18752916
BMJ. 2001 Oct 20;323(7318):908-11
pubmed: 11668137
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Sep 20;6:1146-63
pubmed: 16998603
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Jun;33(6):462-474
pubmed: 28481165
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Sep;62(9):1229-36
pubmed: 20506122
J Adolesc. 2009 Apr;32(2):393-408
pubmed: 18691746
J R Soc Med. 2018 Jul;111(7):240-252
pubmed: 29672201
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3007-3014
pubmed: 32666488
Med Care. 2009 Aug;47(8):826-34
pubmed: 19584762
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705
pubmed: 15528286
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 26;10(1):4389
pubmed: 31558713
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):311-318
pubmed: 31285208
Psychooncology. 2005 Oct;14(10):875-84; discussion 885-6
pubmed: 16200515
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112693
pubmed: 31783228
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;18(7):337-9
pubmed: 24972506
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1):165-172
pubmed: 27859970
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):1865-1877
pubmed: 35125208
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Feb 08;13:6
pubmed: 22316293
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(2):121-6
pubmed: 12078535
Eur J Pain. 2016 May;20(5):675-88
pubmed: 26492629
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):670-4
pubmed: 12911651
Pain. 2013 Apr;154(4):511-514
pubmed: 23473783

Auteurs

Stephanie Hughes (S)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK sh3r11@southampton.ac.uk.

Jane Louise Vennik (JL)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Kirsten A Smith (KA)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Jennifer Bostock (J)

Policy Innovation & Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU): London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Jeremy Howick (J)

University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.

Christian Mallen (C)

Keele University, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Staffordshire, UK.

Paul Little (P)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Mohana Ratnapalan (M)

University of Nottingham, Centre for Academic Primary Care, Nottingham, UK.

Emily Lyness (E)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Geraldine M Leydon (GM)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Hajira Dambha-Miller (H)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Leanne Morrison (L)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.
Psychology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Hazel A Everitt (HA)

University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, UK.

Felicity L Bishop (FL)

Psychology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Classifications MeSH