Functional traits of plants and pollinators explain resource overlap between honeybees and wild pollinators.
Apis mellifera
Competition
Foraging behaviour
Plant–pollinator networks
Trait similarity
Journal
Oecologia
ISSN: 1432-1939
Titre abrégé: Oecologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0150372
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
23
03
2022
pubmed:
6
4
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
entrez:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Managed and wild pollinators often cohabit in both managed and natural ecosystems. The western honeybee, Apis mellifera, is the most widespread managed pollinator species. Due to its density and behaviour, it can potentially influence the foraging activity of wild pollinators, but the strength and direction of this effect are often context-dependent. Here, we observed plant-pollinator interactions in 51 grasslands, and we measured functional traits of both plants and pollinators. Using a multi-model inference approach, we explored the effects of honeybee abundance, temperature, plant functional diversity, and trait similarity between wild pollinators and the honeybee on the resource overlap between wild pollinators and the honeybee. Resource overlap decreased with increasing honeybee abundance only in plant communities with high functional diversity, suggesting a potential diet shift of wild pollinators in areas with a high variability of flower morphologies. Moreover, resource overlap increased with increasing trait similarity between wild pollinators and the honeybee. In particular, central-place foragers of family Apidae with proboscis length similar to the honeybee exhibited the highest resource overlap. Our results underline the importance of promoting functional diversity of plant communities to support wild pollinators in areas with a high density of honeybee hives. Moreover, greater attention should be paid to areas where pollinators possess functional traits similar to the honeybee, as they are expected to be more prone to potential competition with this species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35380272
doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05151-6
pii: 10.1007/s00442-022-05151-6
pmc: PMC9056470
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1019-1029Subventions
Organisme : Università degli Studi di Padova
ID : STARS-CoG-2017
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):589-96
pubmed: 17483965
Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):583-93
pubmed: 19775273
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 7;279(1748):4845-52
pubmed: 23034701
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27115
pubmed: 22073268
Ecol Lett. 2021 Jan;24(1):149-161
pubmed: 33073900
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843):
pubmed: 27881750
Ecol Lett. 2019 Mar;22(3):469-479
pubmed: 30609161
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1608-11
pubmed: 23449997
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 1;10(1):1481
pubmed: 30931943
Ecol Lett. 2013 May;16(5):577-83
pubmed: 23438174
Oecologia. 1980 May;45(2):197-201
pubmed: 28309530
Stat Med. 2008 Jul 10;27(15):2865-73
pubmed: 17960576
Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):299-305
pubmed: 20380219
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2290-301
pubmed: 18724739
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4711
pubmed: 30886227
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;1(9):1299-1307
pubmed: 29046536
Ecol Lett. 2016 Oct;19(10):1247-55
pubmed: 27539950
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 10;285(1870):
pubmed: 29321298
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137198
pubmed: 26356234
Oecologia. 2020 Feb;192(2):351-361
pubmed: 31840190
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189268
pubmed: 29220412
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jan;4(1):e1
pubmed: 16332160
Oecologia. 2008 Jul;156(4):835-45
pubmed: 18443825
PeerJ. 2018 May 23;6:e4794
pubmed: 29844961
Ecol Evol. 2015 Oct 16;5(21):5049-56
pubmed: 26640681