Risk perceptions and COVID-19 protective behaviors: A two-wave longitudinal study of epidemic and post-epidemic periods.
Affect heuristic
Affective risk perception
COVID-19
Cognitive risk perception
Cultural worldviews
Longitudinal study
Protective behavior
Social norms
Journal
Social science & medicine (1982)
ISSN: 1873-5347
Titre abrégé: Soc Sci Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8303205
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
20
08
2021
revised:
20
03
2022
accepted:
23
03
2022
pubmed:
6
4
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated how perceived risk and protective behaviors changed as the coronavirus epidemic progressed. A longitudinal sample of 538 people responded to a COVID-19 risk perception questionnaire during the outbreak and post-epidemic periods. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), we examined the mean level change of selected constructs and differences in their relationships. We tested a risk perception pathway in which affective attitude, informed by experience, shaped risk perceptions and protective behaviors. The model also postulated a social pathway in which cultural worldviews, like individualism and hierarchy, predicted risk perceptions and protective behaviors through social norms. Latent mean difference analyses revealed a decrease in social distancing behaviors and an increase in hygiene-cleanliness, corresponding to a reduction in risk perceptions and social norms and a rise in direct and indirect experience, while affective attitude remained substantially stable. Cross-sectional and longitudinal path analyses showed that affective risk perception, primarily informed by affective attitude, and social norms promoted behavior consistency regardless of epidemic contingencies. Instead, analytic risk perceptions were linked to protective behaviors only during the outbreak. Although risk perceptions dropped over time, analytic risk perceptions dropped more steeply than affective risk perceptions. Our findings supported the distinction between affective and deliberative processes in risk perception, reinforcing the view that affective reactions are needed to deploy analytic processes. Our study also supports the claim that perceived social norms are essential to understanding cultural worldview-related protective behaviors variability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35381434
pii: S0277-9536(22)00255-6
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114949
pmc: PMC8957385
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114949Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):28-38
pubmed: 26168420
J Behav Med. 2021 Jun;44(3):285-295
pubmed: 33517487
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):55-73
pubmed: 12713756
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262197
pubmed: 35025940
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Sep;15(3):213-27
pubmed: 19751072
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Aug;31(8):809-13
pubmed: 21692090
Psychol Health. 2011 Feb;26(2):133-49
pubmed: 21318926
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72
pubmed: 12529060
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24):
pubmed: 34045360
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106424
pubmed: 33440191
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0247454
pubmed: 33651809
Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):311-22
pubmed: 15078302
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13):
pubmed: 32630054
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:577331
pubmed: 33519593
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Feb;37(1):46-57
pubmed: 19255818
Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:205-35
pubmed: 15012481
Health Commun. 2022 Jul;37(8):952-961
pubmed: 33541140
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1178-1188
pubmed: 27280365
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0235112
pubmed: 32574184
Psychol Bull. 2001 Mar;127(2):267-86
pubmed: 11316014
J Happiness Stud. 2021;22(8):3593-3610
pubmed: 33814971
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):585-587
pubmed: 32444200
Risk Anal. 2015 Dec;35(12):2183-201
pubmed: 26033253
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 5;6(2):e19374
pubmed: 32338613
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(1):437-448
pubmed: 33776380
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 01;12:619145
pubmed: 33597909
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(2):220-35
pubmed: 24717008
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245859
pubmed: 33481945
Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):56-65
pubmed: 19210018
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0191994
pubmed: 29494705
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742
pubmed: 33047037
J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;37(1):11-21
pubmed: 23073599
Econ Polit (Bologna). 2021;38(2):483-504
pubmed: 35422606
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):1020-1038
pubmed: 32951244
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):653-663
pubmed: 26961206
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 02;12:646558
pubmed: 33737899
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e19982
pubmed: 32584779
Health Psychol. 2015 Jun;34(6):642-52
pubmed: 25222083
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):157-167
pubmed: 32576418
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2021 Nov;13(4):835-852
pubmed: 33855817
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73
pubmed: 22799625
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41
pubmed: 26172965
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Feb;31(1):45-52
pubmed: 16472038
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;74(10):e13592
pubmed: 32563197
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1649
pubmed: 33148201