Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Health-related quality-of-life results from KEYNOTE-048.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Cetuximab
/ therapeutic use
Chronic Disease
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Pain
/ drug therapy
Quality of Life
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
/ drug therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Chemotherapy head and neck neoplasms
Immunotherapy
Patient reported outcome measures
Pembrolizumab
Phase III clinical trial
Quality of life
Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
Journal
Oral oncology
ISSN: 1879-0593
Titre abrégé: Oral Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9709118
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
10
11
2021
revised:
04
03
2022
accepted:
08
03
2022
pubmed:
6
4
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
entrez:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with first-line pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, or cetuximab-chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 trial (NCT02358031). HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-question quality-of-life (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer-specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level instruments (EQ-5D-3L). Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) at week 15 and time to deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing. Of 882 enrolled participants, 844 received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥ 1 HRQoL assessment; adherence was ≥ 79% at week 15 across treatment groups. At week 15, EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores remained stable; no clinically meaningful between-group differences were observed (least squares mean difference, pembrolizumab vs cetuximab-chemotherapy, 0.24; 95% CI, -3.34 to 3.82; pembrolizumab-chemotherapy vs cetuximab-chemotherapy, 0.40; 95% CI, -3.46 to 4.26). Median TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing scores was not reached over 51 weeks across groups, showing stable HRQoL. TTD was similar between groups for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (pembrolizumab vs cetuximab-chemotherapy: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.95-2.00; pembrolizumab-chemotherapy vs cetuximab-chemotherapy: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.94-2.00), as was TTD in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing scores. Pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy extended OS while maintaining HRQoL, further supporting first-line use for R/M HNSCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35381576
pii: S1368-8375(22)00104-X
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105815
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02358031']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105815Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.