Maternal Diabetes and Intrapartum Fetal Electrocardiogram.
Journal
American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 1098-8785
Titre abrégé: Am J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8405212
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jul 2022
10 Jul 2022
Historique:
pmc-release:
10
01
2024
pubmed:
6
4
2022
medline:
6
4
2022
entrez:
5
4
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) ST changes are associated with fetal cardiac hypoxia. Our objective was to evaluate ST changes by maternal diabetic status and stage of labor. This was a secondary analysis of a multicentered randomized-controlled trial in which laboring patients with singleton gestations underwent fetal ECG scalp electrode placement and were randomly assigned to masked or unmasked ST-segment readings. Our primary outcome was the frequency of fetal ECG tracings with ST changes by the stage of labor. ECG tracings were categorized into mutually exclusive groups (ST depression, ST elevation without ST depression, or no ST changes). We compared participants with DM, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and no DM. Of the 5,436 eligible individuals in the first stage of labor (95 with pregestational DM and 370 with GDM), 4,427 progressed to the second stage. ST depression occurred more frequently in the first stage of labor in participants with pregestational DM (15%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-4.24) and with GDM (9.5%, aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.25) as compared with participants without DM (5.7%). The frequency of ST elevation was similar in participants with pregestational DM (33%, aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.48-1.30) and GDM (33.2%, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-1.17) as compared with those without DM (34.2%). In the second stage, ST depression did not occur in participants with pregestational DM (0%) and occurred more frequently in participants with GDM (3.5%, aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.02-3.98) as compared with those without DM (2.0%). ST elevation occurred more frequently in participants with pregestational DM (30%, aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.02-3.22) but not with GDM (19.0%, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.47) as compared with those without DM (17.8%). ST changes in fetal ECG occur more frequently in fetuses of diabetic mothers during labor. gov number, NCT01131260. ST changes in fetal ECG, a marker of fetal cardiac hypoxia, occur more frequently in fetuses of diabetic parturients. · Fetal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and cardiac dysfunction occur frequently among fetuses of diabetic patients.. · Fetal ECG changes such as ST elevation and depression reflect cardiac hypoxia.. · Fetuses of diabetic patients demonstrate a higher prevalence of fetal ECG tracings with ST changes..
Identifiants
pubmed: 35381609
doi: 10.1055/a-1817-5788
pmc: PMC9532457
mid: NIHMS1791616
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01131260']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD027869
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD087230
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD027915
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD027917
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD040512
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD040544
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD034208
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD040485
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD021410
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U24 HD036801
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Mar;13(2):189-96
pubmed: 21933314
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1986 May;25(5):266-71
pubmed: 3698447
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1173-1180
pubmed: 20502287
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1980;59(5):411-5
pubmed: 7446005
Arq Bras Cardiol. 1997 Dec;69(6):389-94
pubmed: 9609010
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;39(1):9-13
pubmed: 28245507
Acta Physiol Scand. 1981 Sep;113(1):1-7
pubmed: 7315431
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;184(4):743-51
pubmed: 11262482
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):290.e1-7
pubmed: 24813596
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Feb;84(2):122-8
pubmed: 15683370
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Jan;43(1):65-72
pubmed: 27862741
Lancet. 1992 Jul 25;340(8813):194-8
pubmed: 1353134
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 2):925-7
pubmed: 11704206
Acta Med Iran. 2017 Feb;55(2):103-108
pubmed: 28282706
Acta Physiol Scand. 1979 Feb;105(2):195-203
pubmed: 33536
J Med Case Rep. 2017 Mar 24;11(1):78
pubmed: 28335811
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):419-23
pubmed: 16553653
Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Nov;98(3):275-84
pubmed: 11642
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):632-41
pubmed: 26267623
Lancet. 2001 Aug 18;358(9281):534-8
pubmed: 11520523
Pediatr Cardiol. 2004 Mar-Apr;25(2):137-40
pubmed: 14648003
Exp Diabetes Res. 2011;2011:564316
pubmed: 22144987
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;197(3):299.e1-6
pubmed: 17826428
Diabetes Care. 2005 Aug;28(8):2084
pubmed: 16043770
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Apr;21(4):231-8
pubmed: 18330818