Repeatability of i.Profiler for measuring wavefront aberrations in healthy eyes.
Corneal aberration
I.profiler
Ocular aberration
Pupil diameter
Repeatability
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
31
08
2021
accepted:
10
03
2022
pubmed:
7
4
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
entrez:
6
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the repeatability of wavefront aberration measurements and the correlation between corneal aberration and pupil size in normal eyes using a wavefront-based autorefractor (i.Profiler A prospective cross-sectional study. Wavefront aberrations, including spherical aberration (SA) (Z A total of 96 healthy young volunteers were enrolled. Corneal and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOA) measured by i.Profiler showed S The measurements of wavefront aberrations by i.Profiler are highly repeatable. Corneal HOA was significantly dependent on pupil size. SA was the most influential aberration for visual quality in this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35381898
doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02300-x
pii: 10.1007/s10792-022-02300-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2525-2531Subventions
Organisme : health and family planning commission of sichuan province
ID : 18ZD022
Organisme : key project of nanchong city and university cooperation
ID : 18SXHZ0492
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Kim J, Choi SH, Lim DH, Yoon GJ, Chung TY (2020) Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK. BMC Ophthalmol 20:192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0
doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0
pubmed: 32410588
pmcid: 7226954
Masiwa LE, Moodley V (2020) A review of corneal imaging methods for the early diagnosis of pre-clinical Keratoconus. J Optom 13:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2019.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.11.001
pubmed: 31917136
pmcid: 7520528
Hughes RP, Vincent SJ, Read SA, Collins MJ (2020) Higher order aberrations, refractive errodevelopment and myopia control: a review. Clin Exp Optom 103:68–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12960
doi: 10.1111/cxo.12960
pubmed: 31489693
Carracedo G, Carpena-Torres C, Batres L, Serramito M, Gonzalez-Bergaz A (2020) Comparison of two wavefront autorefractors: binocular open-field versus monocular closed-field. J Ophthalmol 3:8580471. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8580471
doi: 10.1155/2020/8580471
Garzón N, García-Montero M, López-Artero E, Poyales F, Albarrán-Diego C (2019) Influence of trifocal intraocular lenses on standard autorefraction and aberrometer-based autorefraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.017 (Epub 2019 Jul 17)
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.017
pubmed: 31326229
Lebow KA, Campbell CE (2014) A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 91:1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000378
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000378
pubmed: 25198541
Rauscher FG, Lange H, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Tegetmeyer H, Blendowske R et al (2019) Agreement and repeatability of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic wavefront-based autorefraction in children. Optom Vis Sci 96:879–889. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001444
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001444
pubmed: 31703049
pmcid: 6855388
Mcalinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K (2015) Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2598–2604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.029
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.029
pubmed: 26796439
Muller R, Buttner P (2010) A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med 13:2465–2476. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780132310
doi: 10.1002/sim.4780132310
Truckenbrod C, Meigen C, Brandt M, Vogel M, Wahl S, Jurkutat A, Kiess W (2020) Reference curves for refraction in a German cohort of healthy children and adolescents. PLoS ONE 15:0230291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230291.eCollection2020
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230291.eCollection2020
Putnam NM, Vasudevan B, Juarez A, Le CT, Sam K, de Gracia PD, Hoppert A (2019) Comparing habitual and i. Script Refract BMC Ophthalmol 19:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1053-x
doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1053-x
Hartwig A, Atchison DA, Radhakrishnan H (2013) Higher-order aberrations and anisometropia. Curr Eye Res 38:215–219. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.738462 (Epub 2012 Nov 15)
doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.738462
pubmed: 23153351
Yin Y-W, Zhao Y, Xiao-ying Wu, Jiang M-Y, Xia X-b, Chen Y, Song W-T, Sheng-fa Hu, Zhou X, Young K, Wen D (2019) One-year effect of wearing orthokeratology lenses on the visual quality of juvenile myopia: a retrospective study. Peer J 7:6998. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6998
doi: 10.7717/peerj.6998
Naderan M, Jahanrad A, Farjadnia M (2017) Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol 38:1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792017-0620-5
doi: 10.1007/s10792017-0620-5
pubmed: 28647782
Koh S (2018) Irregular astigmatism and higher-order aberrations in eyes with dry eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:36–40. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23500
doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23500
Hoshing A, Samant M, Bhosale S, Naik A, Naik AM (2019) Comparison of higher order aberrations in amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes in pediatric patients with anisometropic amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol 67:1025–1029. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO-1625-18
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO-1625-18
pubmed: 31238401
pmcid: 6611289
Levy Y, Segal O, Avni I, Zadok D (2005) Ocular higher-order aberrations in eyes with supernormal vision. Am J Ophthalmol 139:225–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.035
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.035
pubmed: 15733980
Randazzo A, Nizzola F, Rossetti L, Orzalesi N, Vinciguerra P (2005) Pharmacological management of night vision disturbances after refractive surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1764–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.02.042
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.02.042
pubmed: 16246781
Applegate RA, Donnelly WJ, Marsack JD, Koenig DE, Pesudovs K (2007) Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 24:578–587. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.24.000578
doi: 10.1364/josaa.24.000578
pubmed: 17301847
pmcid: 2083284
Liao X, Haung X-Q, Lan C-J, Tan Q-Q, Wen B-W, Lin J, Tian J (2019) Comprehensive evaluation of retinal image quality in comparing different aspheric to spherical intraocular lens implants. Curr Eye Res 44:1098–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1615512
doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1615512
pubmed: 31055964
Beiko GH, Haigis W, Steinmueller A (2007) Distribution of corneal spherical aberration in a comprehensive ophthalmology practice and whether keratometry can predict aberration values. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:848–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.035
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.035
pubmed: 17466860
Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP, Javaloy J, Ayala MJ (2011) Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with 2 multifocal intraocular lens models with rotational asymmetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1605–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.054
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.054
pubmed: 21855760
Venter JA, Barclay D, Pelouskova M, Bull CEL (2014) Initial experience with a new refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 30:770–776. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20141021-09
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20141021-09
pubmed: 25375850
Ramón ML, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ (2012) Correlation of visual performance with quality of life and intraocular aberrometric profile in patients implanted with rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg 28:93–99. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20111213-02
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111213-02
pubmed: 22185467
Omar IAN, Zein HA (2019) Accelerated epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus:12-month results. Clin Ophthalmol 13:2385–2394. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S232118
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S232118
pubmed: 31824132
pmcid: 6900281