Patterns of sexual behaviour associated with repeated chlamydia testing and infection in men and women: a latent class analysis.

Latent class analysis Ordered logistic regression Sexual behaviour patterns Stratified analysis by sex Sweden Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 04 2022
Historique:
received: 12 01 2021
accepted: 08 12 2021
entrez: 6 4 2022
pubmed: 7 4 2022
medline: 8 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Adolescents and young adults are at higher risk of acquiring Chlamydia trachomatis infection (chlamydia), so testing is promoted in these populations. Studies have shown that re-testing for chlamydia is common amongst them. We investigated how sexual risk behaviour profiles are associated with repeated testing for chlamydia. We used baseline data from a cohort of 2814 individuals recruited at an urban STI -clinic. We applied latent class (LC) analysis using 9 manifest variables on sexual behaviour and substance use self-reported by the study participants. We fitted ordered logistic regression to investigate the association of LC membership with the outcomes repeated testing during the past 12 months and lifetime repeated testing for chlamydia. Models were fit separately for men and women. We identified four LCs for men and three LCs for women with increasing gradient of risky sexual behaviour. The two classes with the highest risk among men were associated with lifetime repeated testing for chlamydia: adjOR = 2.26 (95%CI: 1.50-3.40) and adjOR = 3.03 (95%CI: 1.93-4.74) as compared with the class with lowest risk. In women, the class with the highest risk was associated with increased odds of repeated lifetime testing (adjOR =1.85 (95%CI: 1.24-2.76)) and repeated testing during past 12 months (adjOR = 1.72 (95%CI: 1.16-2.54)). An association with chlamydia positive test at the time of the study and during the participant's lifetime was only found in the male highest risk classes. Prevention messages with regard to testing for chlamydia after unprotected sexual contact with new/casual partners seem to reach individuals in highest risk behaviour classes who are more likely to test repeatedly. Further prevention efforts should involve potentially more tailored sex-specific interventions taking into consideration risk behaviour patterns.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Adolescents and young adults are at higher risk of acquiring Chlamydia trachomatis infection (chlamydia), so testing is promoted in these populations. Studies have shown that re-testing for chlamydia is common amongst them. We investigated how sexual risk behaviour profiles are associated with repeated testing for chlamydia.
METHODS
We used baseline data from a cohort of 2814 individuals recruited at an urban STI -clinic. We applied latent class (LC) analysis using 9 manifest variables on sexual behaviour and substance use self-reported by the study participants. We fitted ordered logistic regression to investigate the association of LC membership with the outcomes repeated testing during the past 12 months and lifetime repeated testing for chlamydia. Models were fit separately for men and women.
RESULTS
We identified four LCs for men and three LCs for women with increasing gradient of risky sexual behaviour. The two classes with the highest risk among men were associated with lifetime repeated testing for chlamydia: adjOR = 2.26 (95%CI: 1.50-3.40) and adjOR = 3.03 (95%CI: 1.93-4.74) as compared with the class with lowest risk. In women, the class with the highest risk was associated with increased odds of repeated lifetime testing (adjOR =1.85 (95%CI: 1.24-2.76)) and repeated testing during past 12 months (adjOR = 1.72 (95%CI: 1.16-2.54)). An association with chlamydia positive test at the time of the study and during the participant's lifetime was only found in the male highest risk classes.
CONCLUSION
Prevention messages with regard to testing for chlamydia after unprotected sexual contact with new/casual partners seem to reach individuals in highest risk behaviour classes who are more likely to test repeatedly. Further prevention efforts should involve potentially more tailored sex-specific interventions taking into consideration risk behaviour patterns.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35382799
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12394-0
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-12394-0
pmc: PMC8981706
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

652

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

BMC Public Health. 2008 May 09;8:155
pubmed: 18471281
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):437-443
pubmed: 29136127
Int J STD AIDS. 2014 Jan;25(1):40-51
pubmed: 23970630
Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Apr;31(4):205-8
pubmed: 15028932
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 28;17(1):526
pubmed: 28754106
J Sex Res. 2019 May-Jun;56(4-5):409-424
pubmed: 30958036
Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106200
pubmed: 32659244
Lakartidningen. 2003 Oct 30;100(44):3510-2, 3515-6
pubmed: 14651010
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Sep-Oct;31(5):546-51
pubmed: 9429194
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Jun;38(6):503-9
pubmed: 22256336
Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Feb;89(1):51-6
pubmed: 22941864
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):1239
pubmed: 32795362
J Sex Res. 2013;50(5):470-9
pubmed: 22420842
Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Feb;45(2):132-137
pubmed: 29329181
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):304-9
pubmed: 17166889
Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Aug;36(8):478-89
pubmed: 19617871
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0217152
pubmed: 31120922
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013 Mar;4(1):23-7
pubmed: 23427929
Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Mar;47(3):171-176
pubmed: 31876886
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Mar;64(3):319-326
pubmed: 30447953
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Jul;47(1):12-9
pubmed: 20547287
Brain Behav. 2021 Feb;11(2):e01959
pubmed: 33222410
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jan;50(1):161-180
pubmed: 31907696
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 24;13:239
pubmed: 23705624
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Apr;44(3):705-15
pubmed: 24449152
Int J Sex Health. 2017;29(1):32-47
pubmed: 29276549
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):1272
pubmed: 30453913
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(12):1938-1944
pubmed: 31131676
Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Jun;5(2):179-211
pubmed: 8817797
Infect Dis Model. 2017 Feb;2(1):100-112
pubmed: 28989988
Lancet. 2013 Nov 30;382(9907):1795-806
pubmed: 24286785
AIDS Behav. 2011 Nov;15(8):1755-63
pubmed: 21484280
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jan;33(1):36-51
pubmed: 16385221
Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Mar;42(3):109-14
pubmed: 25668640
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137
pubmed: 26042815
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;16(9):1057-1064
pubmed: 27289389
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jun 22;9:198
pubmed: 19545403
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 27;11(9):e0163597
pubmed: 27676175
Sex Transm Dis. 2002 Sep;29(9):503-9
pubmed: 12218840
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Dec;42(8):759-65
pubmed: 25260638
Sex Transm Infect. 2020 May;96(3):160-165
pubmed: 31932359
Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Aug;22(8):436-41
pubmed: 21795417
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 15;69(9):1517-1525
pubmed: 31504315
Int J STD AIDS. 2012 Feb;23(2):83-7
pubmed: 22422680
Addict Behav Rep. 2017 Aug 12;6:56-64
pubmed: 29450237
Nurs Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;51(6):404-10
pubmed: 12464761
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):730
pubmed: 29141635
Health Educ Behav. 2016 Feb;43(1):61-7
pubmed: 26194206
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Jun;95(4):300-306
pubmed: 30606817
Int J STD AIDS. 2016 Apr;27(5):333-48
pubmed: 26608577
Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Nov;97(7):501-506
pubmed: 34045364
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):782
pubmed: 29262776
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2010-21
pubmed: 16782250
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 08;10(12):e0143304
pubmed: 26646541
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1923-1994
pubmed: 30496105
Int J STD AIDS. 2002 Feb;13(2):91-101
pubmed: 11839163
Psychol Health. 2019 Oct;34(10):1231-1249
pubmed: 31111739
AIDS Behav. 2014 Aug;18(8):1420-7
pubmed: 24567031
Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug 1;144(3):306-17
pubmed: 8686700
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jan 23;13:30
pubmed: 23343391
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Sep;39(3):443.e1-7
pubmed: 16919809
J Am Coll Health. 2010 May-Jun;58(6):523-32
pubmed: 20452928
Annu Rev Sex Res. 2000;11:125-57
pubmed: 11351830
AIDS Behav. 2013 Mar;17(3):900-13
pubmed: 22460225
Theor Biol Med Model. 2018 May 31;15(1):6
pubmed: 29848374
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 26;6(8):e011312
pubmed: 27566631
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):
pubmed: 32110902
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 15;69(9):1621-1623
pubmed: 30778532
AIDS Behav. 2011 May;15(4):862-8
pubmed: 20694510

Auteurs

Inga Veličko (I)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 281, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65, Solna, Sweden. inga.velicko@ki.se.
Department of Public Health Analysis and Data Management, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Nobels väg 18, 171 82, Solna, Sweden. inga.velicko@ki.se.

Alexander Ploner (A)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 281, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65, Solna, Sweden.

Lena Marions (L)

Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stockholm South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pär Sparén (P)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 281, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65, Solna, Sweden.

Björn Herrmann (B)

Section of Clinical Bacteriology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Sharon Kühlmann-Berenzon (S)

Department of Public Health Analysis and Data Management, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Nobels väg 18, 171 82, Solna, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH