The impact of tofacitinib on fatigue, sleep, and health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from Phase 3 trials.


Journal

Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 04 2022
Historique:
received: 27 05 2021
accepted: 13 01 2022
entrez: 6 4 2022
pubmed: 7 4 2022
medline: 8 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fatigue, a common symptom of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is detrimental to health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated the impact of tofacitinib on fatigue, sleep, and HRQoL and explored associations between fatigue, related patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and disease activity in RA patients. This post hoc analysis pooled data from three Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib (ORAL Scan; ORAL Standard; ORAL Sync) in RA patients. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, placebo, or adalimumab (active control; ORAL Standard only, not powered for superiority) with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Assessed through Month (M)12 were changes from baseline in disease activity, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale (MOS-SS), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) composite/domain scores, and proportions of patients reporting improvements from baseline in FACIT-F total and SF-36 domain scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) or ≥ population normative values. Pearson correlations examined associations among PROs at M6. Treatment comparisons were exploratory, with p < 0.05 considered nominally significant. Generally, active treatment led to significant improvements from baseline in FACIT-F total, and MOS-SS and SF-36 composite/domain scores vs placebo, observed by M1 and maintained through M6 (last placebo-controlled time point). Through M6, more patients achieved improvements from baseline ≥ MCID and achieved scores ≥ population normative values in FACIT-F total and SF-36 domain scores with tofacitinib vs placebo. Through M12, some nominally significant improvements with tofacitinib vs adalimumab were observed. With active treatment at M6, FACIT-F scores were moderately (0.40-0.59) to highly (≥ 0.60) correlated with SF-36 composite/domain scores (particularly vitality), moderately correlated with most MOS-SS domain scores, and highly correlated with MOS-SS Sleep Problems Index I scores. Disease activity correlations were moderate with FACIT-F scores and low (0.20-0.39) to moderate with SF-36 general health domain/composite scores. Tofacitinib and adalimumab generally conferred significant, clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, sleep, and HRQoL (including vitality) vs placebo through M6, with improvements maintained to M12. M6 correlations between FACIT-F, PROs of sleep, HRQoL, and disease activity underscore the interrelatedness of multiple PROs and disease activity in RA. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Fatigue, a common symptom of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is detrimental to health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated the impact of tofacitinib on fatigue, sleep, and HRQoL and explored associations between fatigue, related patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and disease activity in RA patients.
METHODS
This post hoc analysis pooled data from three Phase 3 studies of tofacitinib (ORAL Scan; ORAL Standard; ORAL Sync) in RA patients. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, placebo, or adalimumab (active control; ORAL Standard only, not powered for superiority) with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Assessed through Month (M)12 were changes from baseline in disease activity, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale (MOS-SS), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) composite/domain scores, and proportions of patients reporting improvements from baseline in FACIT-F total and SF-36 domain scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) or ≥ population normative values. Pearson correlations examined associations among PROs at M6. Treatment comparisons were exploratory, with p < 0.05 considered nominally significant.
RESULTS
Generally, active treatment led to significant improvements from baseline in FACIT-F total, and MOS-SS and SF-36 composite/domain scores vs placebo, observed by M1 and maintained through M6 (last placebo-controlled time point). Through M6, more patients achieved improvements from baseline ≥ MCID and achieved scores ≥ population normative values in FACIT-F total and SF-36 domain scores with tofacitinib vs placebo. Through M12, some nominally significant improvements with tofacitinib vs adalimumab were observed. With active treatment at M6, FACIT-F scores were moderately (0.40-0.59) to highly (≥ 0.60) correlated with SF-36 composite/domain scores (particularly vitality), moderately correlated with most MOS-SS domain scores, and highly correlated with MOS-SS Sleep Problems Index I scores. Disease activity correlations were moderate with FACIT-F scores and low (0.20-0.39) to moderate with SF-36 general health domain/composite scores.
CONCLUSION
Tofacitinib and adalimumab generally conferred significant, clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, sleep, and HRQoL (including vitality) vs placebo through M6, with improvements maintained to M12. M6 correlations between FACIT-F, PROs of sleep, HRQoL, and disease activity underscore the interrelatedness of multiple PROs and disease activity in RA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009).

Identifiants

pubmed: 35382883
doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02724-x
pii: 10.1186/s13075-022-02724-x
pmc: PMC8981846
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antirheumatic Agents 0
Piperidines 0
Pyrimidines 0
Pyrroles 0
tofacitinib 87LA6FU830
Methotrexate YL5FZ2Y5U1

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00856544', 'NCT00847613', 'NCT00853385']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

83

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Rheumatol. 2005 May;32(5):811-9
pubmed: 15868614
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jul;45(7):885-9
pubmed: 16449363
RMD Open. 2020 May;6(1):
pubmed: 32385141
J Rheumatol. 2006 Oct;33(10):1942-51
pubmed: 16960928
J Clin Med. 2018 Oct 09;7(10):
pubmed: 30304765
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Mar;8(3):231-40
pubmed: 11915973
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):559-70
pubmed: 23348607
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Nov 1;58(Suppl 5):v1-v2
pubmed: 31682273
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Feb 10;23(1):53
pubmed: 33568191
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1720-7
pubmed: 21807792
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):592-598
pubmed: 27565000
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;74(9):1691-6
pubmed: 24794149
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jan;73(1):53-60
pubmed: 32852109
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19
pubmed: 22873531
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 06;(6):CD008334
pubmed: 27271314
J Rheumatol. 2014 Oct;41(10):1966-73
pubmed: 25128510
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 May-Jun;34(3):430-42
pubmed: 27156561
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 04;17:307
pubmed: 26530039
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;67(4):475-83
pubmed: 25186034
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct 15;53(5):697-702
pubmed: 16208668
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 15;22(1):243
pubmed: 33059710
Qual Life Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2443-2451
pubmed: 29797175
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24
pubmed: 3358796
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):253-61
pubmed: 24026258
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 May;19(5):25
pubmed: 28386762
RMD Open. 2016 Sep 28;2(2):e000308
pubmed: 27752357
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1313-1321
pubmed: 30442279
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Oct;67(10):1345-53
pubmed: 25988705
J Inflamm (Lond). 2010 Aug 11;7:41
pubmed: 20701804
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 16;1:79
pubmed: 14678568
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Oct;44(2):123-30
pubmed: 24973898
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jul 10;7:64
pubmed: 19591683
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Jun;55(6):1031-41
pubmed: 26929445
J Med Chem. 2010 Dec 23;53(24):8468-84
pubmed: 21105711
J Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;34(2):280-9
pubmed: 17304654

Auteurs

Susan J Bartlett (SJ)

McGill University, 5252 de Maisonneuve Blvd Ouest, 3D.57, Montreal, QC, H4A 3S5, Canada. Susan.bartlett@mcgill.ca.

Clifton O Bingham (CO)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Ronald van Vollenhoven (R)

Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Christopher Murray (C)

Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.

David Gruben (D)

Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.

David A Gold (DA)

Pfizer Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada.

David Cella (D)

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH