Toward equity-oriented cancer care: a Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) protocol to promote equitable access to lung cancer screening.
Equity-informed patient-oriented research
Equity-oriented health care
Health equity
Health inequity
Lung cancer screening
Participatory co-design
Patient engagement
Protocol
SPOR
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Apr 2022
05 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
03
12
2021
accepted:
15
03
2022
entrez:
6
4
2022
pubmed:
7
4
2022
medline:
7
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Screening for lung cancer with low dose CT can facilitate the detection of early-stage lung cancers that are amenable to treatment, reducing mortality related to lung cancer. Individuals are considered eligible for lung cancer screening if they meet specific high-risk criteria, such as age and smoking history. Population groups that are at highest risk of lung cancer, and therefore, the target of lung cancer screening interventions, are also the least likely to participate in lung cancer screening. This can lead to a widening of health inequities. Deliberate effort is needed to both reduce lung cancer risk (through upstream interventions that promote smoking cessation) as well as midstream interventions that promote equitable access to lung cancer screening. This protocol paper describes an equity-informed patient-oriented research study. Our study aims to promote equitable access to lung cancer screening by partnering with patients to co-design an e-learning module for healthcare providers. The learning module will describe the social context of lung cancer risk and promote access to lung cancer screening by increasing equity at the point of care. We have applied the Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation and detail our study processes in three phases and six steps: Pre-design (establishing a study governance structure); Co-design (identifying research priorities, gathering and interpreting data, co-developing module content); and Post-design (pilot testing the module and developing an implementation plan). Patient engagement in research can promote the design and delivery of healthcare services that are accessible and acceptable to patients. This is particularly important for lung cancer screening as those at highest risk of developing lung cancer are also those who are least likely to participate in lung cancer screening. By detailing the steps of our participatory co-design journey, we are making visible the processes of our work so that they can be linked to future outcomes and related impact, and inform a wide range of patient co-led processes. Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and is responsible for a quarter of all cancer-related deaths in the country. Screening for lung cancer using tools such as a CT scan can allow us to find lung cancers when they are still small and curable. People can receive a lung CT scan depending on how old they are and for how long they have smoked cigarettes. Certain groups of people, particularly those who have fewer resources such as time and money, and those who experience injustice because of who they are and how they look are less likely to participate in lung cancer screening. We can increase participation in lung cancer screening by educating healthcare providers on appropriate and timely ways to talk to patients about lung cancer screening. In this paper, we outline the steps of a patient-partnered study in which many different stakeholders such as patients, providers and policy-makers have come together with a goal to improve equity in access to lung cancer screening. We will do this by jointly creating an online learning module that will educate healthcare providers on how life experiences shape smoking behaviour and lung cancer risk. The module will also impart key skills on how to deliver care which is timely, appropriate and safe. Once the module is ready it will be freely available to all healthcare providers to support the fair and just delivery of lung cancer screening in the province of Ontario and elsewhere.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Screening for lung cancer with low dose CT can facilitate the detection of early-stage lung cancers that are amenable to treatment, reducing mortality related to lung cancer. Individuals are considered eligible for lung cancer screening if they meet specific high-risk criteria, such as age and smoking history. Population groups that are at highest risk of lung cancer, and therefore, the target of lung cancer screening interventions, are also the least likely to participate in lung cancer screening. This can lead to a widening of health inequities. Deliberate effort is needed to both reduce lung cancer risk (through upstream interventions that promote smoking cessation) as well as midstream interventions that promote equitable access to lung cancer screening.
METHODS
METHODS
This protocol paper describes an equity-informed patient-oriented research study. Our study aims to promote equitable access to lung cancer screening by partnering with patients to co-design an e-learning module for healthcare providers. The learning module will describe the social context of lung cancer risk and promote access to lung cancer screening by increasing equity at the point of care. We have applied the Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation and detail our study processes in three phases and six steps: Pre-design (establishing a study governance structure); Co-design (identifying research priorities, gathering and interpreting data, co-developing module content); and Post-design (pilot testing the module and developing an implementation plan).
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patient engagement in research can promote the design and delivery of healthcare services that are accessible and acceptable to patients. This is particularly important for lung cancer screening as those at highest risk of developing lung cancer are also those who are least likely to participate in lung cancer screening. By detailing the steps of our participatory co-design journey, we are making visible the processes of our work so that they can be linked to future outcomes and related impact, and inform a wide range of patient co-led processes.
Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and is responsible for a quarter of all cancer-related deaths in the country. Screening for lung cancer using tools such as a CT scan can allow us to find lung cancers when they are still small and curable. People can receive a lung CT scan depending on how old they are and for how long they have smoked cigarettes. Certain groups of people, particularly those who have fewer resources such as time and money, and those who experience injustice because of who they are and how they look are less likely to participate in lung cancer screening. We can increase participation in lung cancer screening by educating healthcare providers on appropriate and timely ways to talk to patients about lung cancer screening. In this paper, we outline the steps of a patient-partnered study in which many different stakeholders such as patients, providers and policy-makers have come together with a goal to improve equity in access to lung cancer screening. We will do this by jointly creating an online learning module that will educate healthcare providers on how life experiences shape smoking behaviour and lung cancer risk. The module will also impart key skills on how to deliver care which is timely, appropriate and safe. Once the module is ready it will be freely available to all healthcare providers to support the fair and just delivery of lung cancer screening in the province of Ontario and elsewhere.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and is responsible for a quarter of all cancer-related deaths in the country. Screening for lung cancer using tools such as a CT scan can allow us to find lung cancers when they are still small and curable. People can receive a lung CT scan depending on how old they are and for how long they have smoked cigarettes. Certain groups of people, particularly those who have fewer resources such as time and money, and those who experience injustice because of who they are and how they look are less likely to participate in lung cancer screening. We can increase participation in lung cancer screening by educating healthcare providers on appropriate and timely ways to talk to patients about lung cancer screening. In this paper, we outline the steps of a patient-partnered study in which many different stakeholders such as patients, providers and policy-makers have come together with a goal to improve equity in access to lung cancer screening. We will do this by jointly creating an online learning module that will educate healthcare providers on how life experiences shape smoking behaviour and lung cancer risk. The module will also impart key skills on how to deliver care which is timely, appropriate and safe. Once the module is ready it will be freely available to all healthcare providers to support the fair and just delivery of lung cancer screening in the province of Ontario and elsewhere.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35382905
doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00344-y
pii: 10.1186/s40900-022-00344-y
pmc: PMC8980795
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : TLS- 170674
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):247-257
pubmed: 29954854
Med Law. 2007 Dec;26(4):699-707
pubmed: 18284111
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Dec 14;14:152
pubmed: 26694168
Tob Control. 2006 Feb;15(1):59-63
pubmed: 16436407
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):635-671
pubmed: 30350420
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12
pubmed: 33648588
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390
pubmed: 34153165
Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug;17(1):17-24
pubmed: 34543172
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Jul;38(4):645-654
pubmed: 33629448
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Sep;60 Suppl 2:7-12
pubmed: 17708005
Public Health Rep. 2014 May;129(3):252-60
pubmed: 24791023
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 7;22(1):10
pubmed: 33413135
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 27;17(1):154
pubmed: 30261924
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):1-17
pubmed: 32686881
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Aug;6(4):273-276
pubmed: 28573502
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0251264
pubmed: 33956861
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Sep 01;8(9):550-556
pubmed: 31657177
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):150
pubmed: 29258551
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13
pubmed: 29062538
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Aug;48(4):271-7
pubmed: 20722477
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jan;13(1):100844
pubmed: 31668781
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e050056
pubmed: 34321305
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 10;19(1):687
pubmed: 31601199
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Apr;52(2):246-260
pubmed: 35098791
Health Educ Res. 2003 Jun;18(3):292-303
pubmed: 12828231