Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Lucerne (Medicago sativa) Plants Infected with 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australasia'-Related Strain (16SrII-D Subgroup).
defense response
jasmonic acid
lucerne
phytoplasma disease
salicylic acid
Journal
The plant pathology journal
ISSN: 1598-2254
Titre abrégé: Plant Pathol J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 100966769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
28
12
2021
accepted:
10
03
2022
entrez:
7
4
2022
pubmed:
8
4
2022
medline:
8
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Changes in physiological and biochemical patterns in lucerne plants caused by the presence of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australasia', which is one of the significant pathogens causing yield losses in lucerne plants, were investigated. Significant differences were evident in total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and protein amounts between 'Ca. Phytoplasma australasia'-positive and negative lucerne plants. Stress-related metabolites such as phenol, malondialdehyde, and proline accumulations in 'Ca. Phytoplasma australasia'-positive plants were remarkably higher than those of phytoplasma-negative plants. As a response to disease attack, phytoplasma-positive plants exhibited higher antioxidant enzymes (peroxidase and catalase) and non-enzymatic metabolite responses such as jasmonic and salicylic acids. We state that partial disease responses were revealed for the first time to breed resistant lucerne lines infected by 'Ca. Phytoplasma australasia'.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35385919
pii: PPJ.OA.12.2021.0189
doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.12.2021.0189
pmc: PMC9343899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
146-158Références
Plant Cell Rep. 2021 Nov;40(11):2081-2095
pubmed: 34173047
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Sep;17(9):538-45
pubmed: 22749315
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 03;9:915
pubmed: 30018629
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Jan;19(1):238-254
pubmed: 27997761
Microorganisms. 2020 Apr 07;8(4):
pubmed: 32272632
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968 Apr;125(1):189-98
pubmed: 5655425
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 07;9:1771
pubmed: 30581446
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007 Jun;20(6):697-706
pubmed: 17555277
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:489-521
pubmed: 22559264
Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15(1):1704517
pubmed: 31852340
Phytochemistry. 2015 Sep;117:76-89
pubmed: 26068669
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Apr;137:203-212
pubmed: 30802803
Physiol Plant. 2021 Apr;171(4):653-676
pubmed: 32949408
Prog Lipid Res. 2016 Apr;62:55-74
pubmed: 26783886
Cells. 2021 Mar 10;10(3):
pubmed: 33801884
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;938:159-71
pubmed: 22987414
Molecules. 2016 Aug 23;21(9):
pubmed: 27563858
Plant Dis. 2002 Sep;86(9):945-949
pubmed: 30818553
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Aug 2;:1-24
pubmed: 34338575
BMC Genomics. 2019 Sep 10;20(1):703
pubmed: 31500568
Plant Sci. 2013 Jun;207:79-87
pubmed: 23602102
Physiol Plant. 2022 Jan;174(1):e13497
pubmed: 34245030
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:175-95
pubmed: 21838574
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e70692
pubmed: 23894680
Pathogens. 2020 Apr 07;9(4):
pubmed: 32272699
Phytopathology. 2018 Sep;108(9):1067-1077
pubmed: 29648946
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 28;30(10):1500-1509
pubmed: 32807757
Plant Cell Rep. 2021 Aug;40(8):1513-1541
pubmed: 33034676
New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(4):1410-1427
pubmed: 31442305
Plant Cell Rep. 2019 Mar;38(3):403-416
pubmed: 30684024
Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1-15
pubmed: 16654194