Citizen science in monitoring food environments: a qualitative collective case study of stakeholders' experiences during the Local Environment Action on Food project in Alberta, Canada.
Child health
Citizen science
Community participation
Food
Health promotion
Nutrition policy
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 04 2022
06 04 2022
Historique:
received:
20
07
2021
accepted:
17
03
2022
entrez:
7
4
2022
pubmed:
8
4
2022
medline:
9
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Citizen science bears potential to build a comprehensive view of global food environments and create a broader discussion about how to improve them. Despite its potential, citizen science has not been fully utilised in food environment research. Thus, we sought to explore stakeholders' experiences of the Local Environment Action on Food (LEAF) project, a community-based intervention that employs a citizen science approach to monitoring food environments. We used a qualitative collective case study design to explore citizen science through the LEAF process in seven communities in Alberta, Canada. Data generating strategies included semi-structured interviews with citizen scientists (n = 26), document review of communities' Mini Nutrition Report Cards (n = 7), and researcher observation. Data were analyzed in a multi-phase process, using Charmaz's constant comparison analysis strategy. Analysis revealed two main themes: relationship building and process factors. Communities used three interconnected strategies, engaging the right people, treading lightly, and reaching a consensus, to navigate the vital but challenging relationship building process. Process factors, which were influences on the LEAF process and relationship building, included the local context, flexibility in the LEAF process, and turnover among LEAF community groups. Citizen science through the LEAF project supported the creation and application of food environment evidence: it enabled residents to collect and interpret local food environment data, develop realistic recommendations for change, and provided them with an evidence-based advocacy tool to support the implementation of these recommendations. We recommend a web application that enables independent community food environment assessments. Such a tool could stimulate and sustain citizen involvement in food environment efforts, helping to build the necessary evidence base and promote the creation of healthy food environments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Citizen science bears potential to build a comprehensive view of global food environments and create a broader discussion about how to improve them. Despite its potential, citizen science has not been fully utilised in food environment research. Thus, we sought to explore stakeholders' experiences of the Local Environment Action on Food (LEAF) project, a community-based intervention that employs a citizen science approach to monitoring food environments.
METHODS
We used a qualitative collective case study design to explore citizen science through the LEAF process in seven communities in Alberta, Canada. Data generating strategies included semi-structured interviews with citizen scientists (n = 26), document review of communities' Mini Nutrition Report Cards (n = 7), and researcher observation. Data were analyzed in a multi-phase process, using Charmaz's constant comparison analysis strategy.
RESULTS
Analysis revealed two main themes: relationship building and process factors. Communities used three interconnected strategies, engaging the right people, treading lightly, and reaching a consensus, to navigate the vital but challenging relationship building process. Process factors, which were influences on the LEAF process and relationship building, included the local context, flexibility in the LEAF process, and turnover among LEAF community groups.
CONCLUSION
Citizen science through the LEAF project supported the creation and application of food environment evidence: it enabled residents to collect and interpret local food environment data, develop realistic recommendations for change, and provided them with an evidence-based advocacy tool to support the implementation of these recommendations. We recommend a web application that enables independent community food environment assessments. Such a tool could stimulate and sustain citizen involvement in food environment efforts, helping to build the necessary evidence base and promote the creation of healthy food environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35387614
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13030-1
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-13030-1
pmc: PMC8985336
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
665Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):270-81
pubmed: 10159708
J Urban Health. 2017 Apr;94(2):180-189
pubmed: 28247054
Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 09;:
pubmed: 34373905
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Apr;46(2):204-212
pubmed: 30791712
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 29;14:522
pubmed: 24884443
Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2016 May 15;1(4):30-44
pubmed: 27525309
Can J Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;108(5-6):e636-e638
pubmed: 29356676
Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:199-223
pubmed: 21219169
Nutrients. 2017 Sep 08;9(9):
pubmed: 28885565
Br J Nutr. 2005 Jun;93(6):923-31
pubmed: 16022763
Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):329-38
pubmed: 20880111
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Jun;2(2):249-53
pubmed: 24073118
Health Promot Int. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):505-514
pubmed: 28011657
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(12):2088-2099
pubmed: 32434601
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:24-37
pubmed: 24074208
BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 18;2(6):
pubmed: 23253872
Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):277-290
pubmed: 29149262
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:287-95
pubmed: 25450497