Intersectoral collaboration at a decentralized level: information flows in child welfare and healthcare networks.
Child welfare and healthcare networks
Compare density procedure
Degree centralization
Density
Information exchange
Integrated care
Longitudinal multiple case studies
Network stability
QAP correlation procedure
Structures
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Apr 2022
06 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
12
11
2021
accepted:
15
03
2022
entrez:
7
4
2022
pubmed:
8
4
2022
medline:
9
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As needs of families with social and behavioral health problems often exceed the expertise and possibilities of a single professional, service or organization, cross-service collaboration is indispensable to adequately meeting those needs. Despite the progressive focus on organizing integrated care, service fragmentation and service duplication remain persistent problems in child welfare and healthcare service delivery systems. A crucial factor to overcome these problems is information exchange between organizations. This study explores and compares the development over time of structures of information exchange in networks, concerning both material and knowledge-based information. A comparative case study and social network analysis of three inter-organizational networks of child welfare and healthcare services in different-sized municipalities in the Netherlands. The research population consisted of organizations from various sectors participating in the networks. Data were collected at two moments in time with a mixed method: semi-structured interviews with network managers and an online questionnaire for all network members. Density and degree centralization were used to examine the information exchange structures. Ucinet was used to analyze the data, with use of the statistical tests: Compare Density Procedure and Quadratic Assignment Procedure. This study shows that different structures of information exchange can be distinguished, concerning both material and knowledge-based information. The overall connectedness of the studied structures of the networks are quite similar, but the way in which the involvement is structured turns out to be different between the networks. Over time, the overall connectedness of those structures appears to be stable, but the internal dynamics reveals a major change in relationships between organizations in the networks. Our study yields empirical evidence for the existence of and the differences between structures and dynamics of both material and knowledge-based information exchange relationships. With a loss of more than a half of the relations in a year, the relationships between the organizations in the network are not very stable over time. The contrast between major internal dynamics and the stable overall connectedness is an important point of concern for network managers and public officials, since this impermanence of relations means that long-term integrated care cannot be guaranteed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As needs of families with social and behavioral health problems often exceed the expertise and possibilities of a single professional, service or organization, cross-service collaboration is indispensable to adequately meeting those needs. Despite the progressive focus on organizing integrated care, service fragmentation and service duplication remain persistent problems in child welfare and healthcare service delivery systems. A crucial factor to overcome these problems is information exchange between organizations. This study explores and compares the development over time of structures of information exchange in networks, concerning both material and knowledge-based information.
METHODS
METHODS
A comparative case study and social network analysis of three inter-organizational networks of child welfare and healthcare services in different-sized municipalities in the Netherlands. The research population consisted of organizations from various sectors participating in the networks. Data were collected at two moments in time with a mixed method: semi-structured interviews with network managers and an online questionnaire for all network members. Density and degree centralization were used to examine the information exchange structures. Ucinet was used to analyze the data, with use of the statistical tests: Compare Density Procedure and Quadratic Assignment Procedure.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This study shows that different structures of information exchange can be distinguished, concerning both material and knowledge-based information. The overall connectedness of the studied structures of the networks are quite similar, but the way in which the involvement is structured turns out to be different between the networks. Over time, the overall connectedness of those structures appears to be stable, but the internal dynamics reveals a major change in relationships between organizations in the networks.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study yields empirical evidence for the existence of and the differences between structures and dynamics of both material and knowledge-based information exchange relationships. With a loss of more than a half of the relations in a year, the relationships between the organizations in the network are not very stable over time. The contrast between major internal dynamics and the stable overall connectedness is an important point of concern for network managers and public officials, since this impermanence of relations means that long-term integrated care cannot be guaranteed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35387661
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07810-z
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-07810-z
pmc: PMC8985329
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Sep 23;15:e021
pubmed: 26528096
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Jan;48(1):88-105
pubmed: 32424453
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 May;42(3):325-42
pubmed: 26860960
Healthc Q. 2009;13 Spec No:6-15
pubmed: 20057243
Glob Health Action. 2014 Feb 13;7:23568
pubmed: 24560261
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e011
pubmed: 23687483
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Nov;33(4):349-55
pubmed: 20061027
Int J Public Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):219-229
pubmed: 27572495
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2013 Jan;14(1):52-62
pubmed: 22784821
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):605-617
pubmed: 31378811
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010
pubmed: 23687482
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:69-81
pubmed: 28732237
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 10;18(1):350
pubmed: 29747651
J Soc Social Work Res. 2014 Dec;5(4):513-538
pubmed: 25574359
Soc Networks. 2017 Jan;48:78-99
pubmed: 27867254
Health Serv Res. 1994 Aug;29(3):341-66
pubmed: 8063569