RETINAL NONPERFUSION IN THE EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY SEVEN FIELDS COMPARED WITH WIDEFIELD FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: Correlation and Use of Extrapolation Factor.
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
8
4
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
entrez:
7
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In previous landmark studies on central retinal vein occlusion, retinal nonperfusion assessments were obtained using 7-field (7F) angiography. The widespread current use of widefield imaging allows better visualization of the peripheral retina and more comprehensive estimation of the total area of nonperfusion. The relationship between nonperfusion measurement of 7F and widefield angiography (WFA) in central retinal vein occlusion has not been studied. We aim to identify the correlation of retinal nonperfusion measured within the 7F and on WFA in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. Retinal nonperfusion in participants with central retinal vein occlusion was determined using a 7F Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study template and the concentric rings method. A total of 153 eyes were included. Pearson correlation test showed a near-perfect positive, linear correlation between the nonperfusion found in the 7F and total retinal nonperfusion on WFA (0.985 95% CI [0.793, 0.999]) The regression line equation for nonperfusion on 7F and WFA was y = 37 + 3.2x. Eyes with 0 disk areas (DA), >0 DA to 10 DA and >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7-fields had on average 23 DA 95% CI (19.20, 27.06), 45 DA 95% CI (35.75, 55.18), and 115 DA 95% CI (88.89, 142.05) on widefield respectively. There is a positive and linear relationship between nonperfusion measured by 7F and WFA in central retinal vein occlusion with more than 3-times the amount of nonperfusion identified on WFA. Despite <10 DA no areas of nonperfusion on 7F, there is typically at least 35 DA of nonperfusion on WFA whereas eyes with >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7F had at least 88 DA on WFA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In previous landmark studies on central retinal vein occlusion, retinal nonperfusion assessments were obtained using 7-field (7F) angiography. The widespread current use of widefield imaging allows better visualization of the peripheral retina and more comprehensive estimation of the total area of nonperfusion. The relationship between nonperfusion measurement of 7F and widefield angiography (WFA) in central retinal vein occlusion has not been studied. We aim to identify the correlation of retinal nonperfusion measured within the 7F and on WFA in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion.
METHODS
Retinal nonperfusion in participants with central retinal vein occlusion was determined using a 7F Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study template and the concentric rings method.
RESULTS
A total of 153 eyes were included. Pearson correlation test showed a near-perfect positive, linear correlation between the nonperfusion found in the 7F and total retinal nonperfusion on WFA (0.985 95% CI [0.793, 0.999]) The regression line equation for nonperfusion on 7F and WFA was y = 37 + 3.2x. Eyes with 0 disk areas (DA), >0 DA to 10 DA and >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7-fields had on average 23 DA 95% CI (19.20, 27.06), 45 DA 95% CI (35.75, 55.18), and 115 DA 95% CI (88.89, 142.05) on widefield respectively.
CONCLUSION
There is a positive and linear relationship between nonperfusion measured by 7F and WFA in central retinal vein occlusion with more than 3-times the amount of nonperfusion identified on WFA. Despite <10 DA no areas of nonperfusion on 7F, there is typically at least 35 DA of nonperfusion on WFA whereas eyes with >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7F had at least 88 DA on WFA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35389969
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003498
pii: 00006982-202208000-00019
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1592-1598Références
Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Linton KLP. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1992;99:58–62.
Mitchell P, Smith W, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1243–1247.
Baseline and early natural history report: the central vein occlusion study. Arch Ophthalmol 1993,111:1087–1095.
Schmidt-Erfurth U, Garcia-Arumi J, Gerendas BS, et al. Guidelines for the management of retinal vein occlusion by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA). Ophthalmologica 2019;242:123–162.
Hykin P, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of intravitreal therapy with ranibizumab vs aflibercept vs bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019;137:1256–1264.
Oishi A, Holz FG. Validation of concentric rings method as a topographic measure of retinal nonperfusion in ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;161:220.
Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, et al. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2587–2595.
Nicholson L, Vazquez-Alfageme C, Patrao NV, et al. Retinal nonperfusion in the posterior pole is associated with increased risk of neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;182:118–125.
Tan CS, Sadda SR, Hariprasad SM. Ultra-widefield retinal imaging in the management of diabetic eye diseases. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2014;45:363–366.
Friberg TR, Pandya A, Eller AW. Non-mydriatic panoramic fundus imaging using a non-contact scanning laser-based system. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003;34:488–497.
Tsui I, Kaines A, Havunjian MA, et al. Ischemic index and neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion. Retina 2011;31:105–110.
Nicholson L, Vazquez-Alfageme C, Ramu J, et al. Validation of concentric rings method as a topographic measure of retinal nonperfusion in ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160:1217–1225.e2.
Nicholson L, Vazquez-Alfageme C, Sen P, et al. The clinical relevance of ultra-widefield angiography findings in patients with central retinal vein occlusion and macular oedema receiving anti-VEGF therapy. Eye 2022;36:1086–1093.
Blodi BA, Domalpally A, Scott IU, et al. Standard care vs corticosteroid for retinal vein occlusion (SCORE) Study system for evaluation of stereoscopic color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms: SCORE study report 9. Arch Ophthalmol 2010;128:1140–1145.