Virtual Reality and Eye-Tracking Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Systematic Review and Future Prospects.
assessment
attention
eye-tracking (ET)
immersive virtual reality (VR)
treatment
unilateral spatial neglect (USN)
visuospatial disorders
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
accepted:
26
01
2022
entrez:
8
4
2022
pubmed:
9
4
2022
medline:
9
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a disorder characterized by the failure to report, respond to, or orient toward the contralateral side of space to a brain lesion. Current assessment methods often fail to discover milder forms, cannot differentiate between unilateral spatial neglect subtypes and lack ecological validity. There is also a need for treatment methods that target subtypes. Immersive virtual reality (VR) systems in combination with eye-tracking (ET) have the potential to overcome these shortcomings, by providing more naturalistic environments and tasks, with sensitive and detailed measures. This systematic review examines the state of the art of research on these technologies as applied in the assessment and treatment of USN. As we found no studies that combined immersive VR and ET, we reviewed these approaches individually. The review of VR included seven articles, the ET review twelve. The reviews revealed promising results. (1) All included studies found significant group-level differences for several USN measures. In addition, several studies found asymmetric behavior in VR and ET tasks for patients who did not show signs of USN in conventional tests. Particularly promising features were multitasking in complex VR environments and detailed eye-movement analysis. (2) No VR and only a few ET studies attempted to differentiate USN subtypes, although the technologies appeared appropriate. One ET study grouped USN participants using individual heatmaps, and another differentiated between subtypes on drawing tasks. Regarding (3) ecological validity, although no studies tested the prognostic validity of their assessment methods, VR and ET studies utilized naturalistic tasks and stimuli reflecting everyday situations. Technological characteristics, such as the field of view and refresh rate of the head-mounted displays, could be improved, though, to improve ecological validity. We found (4) no studies that utilized VR or ET technologies for USN treatment up until the search date of the 26th of February 2020. In conclusion, VR-ET-based systems show great potential for USN assessment. VR-ET holds great promise for treatment, for example, by monitoring behavior and adapting and tailoring to the individual person's needs and abilities. Future research should consider developing methods for individual subtypes and differential diagnostics to inform individual treatment programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35391965
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787382
pmc: PMC8982678
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
787382Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P50 HD103537
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Kaiser, Villadsen, Samani, Knoche and Evald.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Sci Rep. 2017 May 16;7(1):1941
pubmed: 28512354
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Aug 09;13(1):70
pubmed: 27503215
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 25;15:658353
pubmed: 34764847
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 02;7:527
pubmed: 24032011
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Apr;27(3):409-454
pubmed: 26620135
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 12;100(6):e24637
pubmed: 33578583
PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0217074
pubmed: 31125360
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;82(12):1407-9
pubmed: 20971750
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 01;(7):CD003586
pubmed: 23813503
Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(1):79-83
pubmed: 26640834
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Apr;27(4):314-24
pubmed: 22960240
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Nov 15;65(3):101592
pubmed: 34662734
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(7):961-82
pubmed: 16647754
Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Mar;123(3):167-74
pubmed: 20569225
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Dec;7(6):742-9
pubmed: 15687810
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 May 25;14:180
pubmed: 32528265
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(3):313-331
pubmed: 29782328
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):177-185
pubmed: 27103056
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):869-876.e1
pubmed: 25461827
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2369-74
pubmed: 21530558
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001 Oct;16(7):653-67
pubmed: 14589784
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;73:70-81
pubmed: 25956677
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Aug 24;4:
pubmed: 20838474
Brain Sci. 2019 Dec 13;9(12):
pubmed: 31847166
J Vis Exp. 2020 Feb 12;(156):
pubmed: 32116302
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2983-93
pubmed: 21391769
Surv Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(2):114-34
pubmed: 21335145
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Aug 25;9:226
pubmed: 26379519
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Aug;52(8):1375-403
pubmed: 25920700
Semin Neurol. 2014 Nov;34(5):514-23
pubmed: 25520023
Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:83-95
pubmed: 30620921
Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2616-27
pubmed: 23969194
Cortex. 2016 Feb;75:233-234
pubmed: 26055617
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Dec;39(25):2531-2543
pubmed: 27669628
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:181-189
pubmed: 27106393
Neurology. 2014 Sep 9;83(11):1012-7
pubmed: 25107877
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 May;17(3):416-30
pubmed: 7650103
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 Mar;20(1):42-8
pubmed: 16467277
Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):850-865
pubmed: 30321035
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 29;12:742445
pubmed: 34912268
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;196:66-8
pubmed: 24732482
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jan 8;150:107692
pubmed: 33232695
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(12):1033-8
pubmed: 23072734
Curr Opin Neurol. 2003 Feb;16(1):51-7
pubmed: 12544857
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):387-94
pubmed: 14670577
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):423-436
pubmed: 28697573
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 10;7:358
pubmed: 23847519
Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):697-702
pubmed: 18999342
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;64(3):331-8
pubmed: 9527144
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 17;6:195
pubmed: 22822394
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Jan 6;:1-15
pubmed: 33406997
Brain Cogn. 2013 Feb;81(1):18-23
pubmed: 23164730
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):506-16
pubmed: 19231479
Brain. 1998 Dec;121 ( Pt 12):2357-67
pubmed: 9874486
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Jan;32(1):46-61
pubmed: 29357742
Cortex. 2009 Nov-Dec;45(10):1156-66
pubmed: 19038381
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jul 2;9(3):e29182
pubmed: 34255653
Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 11;9:359
pubmed: 29942277
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):7-15
pubmed: 17305443
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2415-25
pubmed: 22750122
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Sep 18;:1-21
pubmed: 32945702
Stroke. 1999 Jun;30(6):1196-202
pubmed: 10356099
Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):732-40
pubmed: 12882614
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001 Summer;8(2):10-8
pubmed: 14523742
Occup Ther Health Care. 2016 Oct;30(4):344-355
pubmed: 27494287
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;67(2):236-45
pubmed: 23433279
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2488-95
pubmed: 19410585
Brain Cogn. 1993 Nov;23(2):145-65
pubmed: 8292323
Transl Stroke Res. 2015 Dec;6(6):410-20
pubmed: 26280103
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1068-78
pubmed: 16330055
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(4):597-618
pubmed: 23767963
J Clin Neurosci. 2008 Jun;15(6):647-9
pubmed: 18411051
Psychol Res. 2009 Mar;73(2):147-57
pubmed: 19084997
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Sep;42(7):675-689
pubmed: 32791939
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):191-197
pubmed: 27986428
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e011458
pubmed: 27932337
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):186-190
pubmed: 26830087
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2002 Winter;8(4):79-88
pubmed: 14523732
Brain Behav. 2017 Apr 06;7(5):e00682
pubmed: 28523224
Neuropsychol Rev. 2003 Dec;13(4):181-97
pubmed: 15000225
Brain Inj. 2013;27(3):310-7
pubmed: 23438350
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605
pubmed: 17944619
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):357-69
pubmed: 17119310
Science. 1966 Sep 23;153(3743):1544-7
pubmed: 5917786
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Apr;12(2):175-81
pubmed: 19361298
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 May/Jun;71(3):7103190050p1-7103190050p9
pubmed: 28422631
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Apr 23;15(1):34
pubmed: 29685145
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):273-85
pubmed: 17119304
Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):608-23
pubmed: 11872617
Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb;30(2):165-84
pubmed: 26923937
J Vis Exp. 2021 Mar 10;(169):
pubmed: 33779608
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(4):595-601
pubmed: 32508332
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1072-9
pubmed: 22306520
Cortex. 2006 Jul;42(5):685-91
pubmed: 16909627
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1996 Jan 1;6(1):19-26
pubmed: 22106860
Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):749-56
pubmed: 15007125
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(9):789-98
pubmed: 23797459
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Nov 03;12(12):752-62
pubmed: 22048061
Brain. 2001 May;124(Pt 5):941-52
pubmed: 11335696
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Sep 18;:1-25
pubmed: 32942950
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Feb 18;18(1):39
pubmed: 33602254
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4519
pubmed: 30872760
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 May;49(10):1244-1253
pubmed: 30561071
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:90-106
pubmed: 25698638
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:147-157
pubmed: 26948071
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007 Dec;17(6):657-87
pubmed: 17852762
Acta Neurol Scand. 2010 Mar;121(3):171-7
pubmed: 19839943