Potential histological discordance revealed by second review in the national rare gynecological cancer network (TMRG).

Concordance evaluation Network Ovarian tumor Pathological discordance Pathological review Rare ovarian tumor

Journal

Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 01 02 2022
revised: 24 03 2022
accepted: 25 03 2022
pubmed: 9 4 2022
medline: 26 5 2022
entrez: 8 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Since 2010, the network of rare malignant tumors of the ovary (TMRG) was developed to optimize the management of patients, also allowing a histological second opinion of rare ovarian tumors. The aim of this work was to study the contribution of second opinion to improve histological diagnostic accuracy on ovarian rare malignant tumors included in the TMRG database. Histological data of patients diagnosed with a rare ovarian tumor included in TMRG network over a one-year period (2018) were collected. Initial diagnoses were compared with second opinion from national gynecological pathologist experts. The modalities of histological second opinion requests were studied, as well as the histological characteristics of the tumors. The discordances were classified as minor (if the modification of histological diagnosis did not change patient management) and major (if the patient management can be modified). Of 1185 included patients, 937 matched the inclusion criteria. Full concordance between primary diagnosis and expert second opinion was reached in 611 cases (65,3%), minor discordance was seen in 114 (12,2%) and major discordance in 209 (22,3%) of cases. In systematic review requested by the network, 26% (n = 137) of cases were reported with a change in histological diagnosis, while the change concerned 44% (n = 186) of cases for a second opinion spontaneously requested by the initial pathologist. The discrepancies concerned all categories of ovarian tumors, with a majority of mucinous tumors (43% of major discordances), followed by stromal and sex-cord tumors (13.8% of major discordances) and clear cell tumors (12,4% of major discordances). This analysis confirms the diagnostic difficulty of ovarian tumors, due to their rarity and morphological heterogeneity. French pathologists are aware of these difficulties and spontaneously refer ovarian tumors with unusual histology for a second opinion and collaborate with rare tumor networks for systematic review.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35393217
pii: S0090-8258(22)00201-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.019
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

637-641

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

S Henno (S)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France. Electronic address: sebastien.henno@chu-rennes.fr.

C Jeanne (C)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

T De La Motte Rouge (TM)

Oncologie Médicale, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

C Genestie (C)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

I Treilleux (I)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

S Croce (S)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

P A Just (PA)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.

M A Le Frere-Belda (MA)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.

E Guinaudeau (E)

Institut d'Histopathologie - IHP, Nantes, France.

F Penault-Llorca (F)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand.

L Arnould (L)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.

E Mery-Lamarche (E)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Institut Claudius Rigaud, Toulouse, France.

A Leroux (A)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France.

A S Lemaire (AS)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

G Averous (G)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHU, Strasbourg, France.

O Renaud (O)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHU, Poitiers, France.

E Charafe-Jauffret (E)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

C Bonneau (C)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre hospitalier, Orléans, France.

C Leaha (C)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Val d'Aurelles, Montpellier, France.

I Ray-Coquard (I)

Département d'Oncologie, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.

M Devouassoux-Shisheboran (M)

Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Lyon Sud & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH