Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads.
Epidural paddle placement
re-operation
spinal cord stimulator
Journal
Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
ISSN: 1525-1403
Titre abrégé: Neuromodulation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9804159
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
04
12
2021
revised:
09
02
2022
accepted:
23
02
2022
pubmed:
9
4
2022
medline:
14
7
2022
entrez:
8
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Paddle leads for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offer more efficient energy delivery and advantages in some patients. However, there is concern for how safely SCS paddles can be replaced once previously implanted because of scar tissue and the relative vulnerability of the thoracic cord. In this study, we share our experience on SCS paddle replacement. Participants who underwent SCS replacement at Albany Medical Center between 2011 and 2020 were identified. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data and information regarding initial complications, reason for removal or revision, subsequent complications of replacement surgery and its timing, and whether the implant was ultimately removed. Percutaneous lead replacement cases performed over the same period were used as a comparison group. A total of 1265 patients were identified to have had an SCS-related procedure based on billing codes. Of these, 73 involved replacement of epidural leads (51 paddles, 22 percutaneous). Most paddles (48/51) were replaced at the time of removal. A total of 30 of the 51 paddle replacements required additional lamina removal. Re-operations that occurred more than one year after initial implant were significantly more likely to require additional bone removal (p < 0.001). Paddle re-operations lasted in general 1.7 ± 0.2 hours and had 35 ± 5 mL of blood loss, whereas percutaneous operations lasted 1.3 ± 0.2 hours and had 12.5 ± 2 mL of blood loss. Despite the invasive nature of paddle replacement, there was no difference in complications (p = 0.23) compared with that in percutaneous leads. This study characterizes the safety profile of SCS paddle replacement surgeries. Here, we demonstrate that the replacement of paddle leads at the time of removal, with additional lamina removal if needed because of scar, is associated with low rates of complications. This validates the feasibility and low-risk profile of replacing paddle leads when clinically indicated for experienced surgeons with specialization in SCS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35393239
pii: S1094-7159(22)00558-X
doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.02.228
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
753-757Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.