Engaging children and young people on the potential role of artificial intelligence in medicine.
Journal
Pediatric research
ISSN: 1530-0447
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0100714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
11
12
2021
accepted:
21
03
2022
revised:
15
02
2022
pubmed:
9
4
2022
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
8
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is increasing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its application to medicine. Perceptions of AI are less well-known, notably amongst children and young people (CYP). This workshop investigates attitudes towards AI and its future applications in medicine and healthcare at a specialised paediatric hospital using practical design scenarios. Twenty-one members of a Young Persons Advisory Group for research contributed to an engagement workshop to ascertain potential opportunities, apprehensions, and priorities. When presented as a selection of practical design scenarios, we found that CYP were more open to some applications of AI in healthcare than others. Human-centeredness, governance and trust emerged as early themes, with empathy and safety considered as important when introducing AI to healthcare. Educational workshops with practical examples using AI to help, but not replace humans were suggested to address issues, build trust, and effectively communicate about AI. Whilst policy guidelines acknowledge the need to include children and young people to develop AI, this requires an enabling environment for human-centred AI involving children and young people with lived experiences of healthcare. Future research should focus on building consensus on enablers for an intelligent healthcare system designed for the next generation, which fundamentally, allows co-creation. Children and young people (CYP) want to be included to share their insights about the development of research on the potential role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine and healthcare and are more open to some applications of AI than others. Whilst it is acknowledged that a research gap on involving and engaging CYP in developing AI policies exists, there is little in the way of pragmatic and practical guidance for healthcare staff on this topic. This requires research on enabling environments for ongoing digital cooperation to identify and prioritise unmet needs in the application and development of AI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35393524
doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02053-4
pii: 10.1038/s41390-022-02053-4
pmc: PMC9937917
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
440-444Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Coles, L. S. The application of artificial intelligence to medicine. Futures 9, 315–323 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(77)90097-0
Chang, A. C. Intelligence-Based Medicine: Artificial Intelligence and Human Cognition in Clinical Medicine and Healthcare (Academic Press, 2020).
Hamet, P. & Tremblay, J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism 69, S36–S40 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.011
Szolovits, P. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Routledge, 2019).
Davendralingam, N., Sebire, N. J., Arthurs, O. J. & Shelmerdine, S. C. Artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology: future opportunities. BJR 94, 20200975 (2020).
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200975
pubmed: 32941736
pmcid: 7774693
Liang, H. et al. Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 25, 433–438 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0335-9
pubmed: 30742121
Sisk, B. A., Antes, A. L., Burrous, S. & DuBois, J. M. Parental Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence-Driven Precision Medicine Technologies in Pediatric Healthcare. Children 7, 145 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/children7090145
pubmed: 32962204
pmcid: 7552627
World Health Organization & Department of Maternal, N., Child and Adolescent Health. Making Health Services Adolescent Friendly: Developing National Quality Standards for Adolescent-friendly Health Services (World Health Organization, 2012). www.who.int .
Hargreaves, D. S. et al. Measuring and improving the quality of NHS care for children and young people. Arch. Dis. Child 104, 618–621 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314564
pubmed: 29720493
UNICEF policy guidance on AI for children. The Commonwealth (2020) https://www.thecommonwealth.io/partner-resources/unicef-policy-guidance-on-ai-for-children/ .
Adolescent perspectives on artificial intelligence (2021) https://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/stories/adolescent-perspectives-artificial-intelligence .
Artificial Intelligence for Children: Beijing Principles (2020) https://www.baai.ac.cn/ai-for-children.html .
Richards, T., Montori, V. M., Godlee, F., Lapsley, P. & Paul, D. Let the patient revolution begin. BMJ 346, f2614 (2013).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2614
pubmed: 23674136
Patient involvement. The King’s Fund (2018) https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/topics/patient-involvement .
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPI E) for researchers. GOSH Hospital site (2018) https://www.gosh.nhs.uk/our-research/our-research-infrastructure/nihr-great-ormond-street-hospital-brc/patient-and-public-inv/ppi-researchers/ .
Price, A. et al. Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study. BMJ Open 8, e020452 (2018).
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020452
pubmed: 29572398
pmcid: 5875637
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. & Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 19, 349–357 (2007).
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
pubmed: 17872937
Generation AI 2020: health, wellness and technology in a post-COVID world. IEEE Transmitter https://transmitter.ieee.org/generation-ai-2020/ (2020).
Mayhew, E., Davies, M., Millmore, A., Thompson, L. & Bizama, A. P. The impact of audience response platform Mentimeter on the student and staff learning experience. Res. Learn. Technol. 28, 2397 (2020).
doi: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2397
Little, C. Mentimeter smartphone student response system: a class above clickers. Compass: J. Learn. Teach. 9, (2016).
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005).
doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
pubmed: 16204405
Mayring, P. Qualitative Content Analysis - Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution (2014) (free download via Social Science Open Access Repository SSOAR, URN: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 ).
Gao, S., He, L., Chen, Y., Li, D. & Lai, K. Public perception of artificial intelligence in medical care: content analysis of social media. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e16649 (2020).
Hargreaves, D. S. et al. Children and young people’s versus parents’ responses in an English national inpatient survey. Arch. Dis. Child 103, 486–491 (2018).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313801
pubmed: 29434020
Cameron, D. & Maguire, K. Public views of machine learning: digital natives. Report title 35 (2017)
Service design and healthcare innovation - Research Portal | Lancaster University (2010) http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/service-design-and-healthcare-innovation(30ba2be5-ba03-4979-9542-45260aa5449d)/export.html .
Staniszewska, S. et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 358, j3453 (2017).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453
pubmed: 28768629
pmcid: 5539518