Association of Abnormal Findings on Neonatal Cranial Ultrasound With Neurobehavior at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge in Infants Born Before 30 Weeks' Gestation.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2022
01 04 2022
Historique:
entrez:
8
4
2022
pubmed:
9
4
2022
medline:
13
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cranial ultrasound (CUS) findings are routinely used to identify preterm infants at risk for impaired neurodevelopment, and neurobehavioral examinations provide information about early brain function. The associations of abnormal findings on early and late CUS with neurobehavior at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge have not been reported. To examine the associations between early and late CUS findings and infant neurobehavior at NICU discharge. This prospective cohort study included infants enrolled in the Neonatal Neurobehavior and Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants Study between April 2014 and June 2016. Infants born before 30 weeks' gestational age were included. Exclusion criteria were maternal age younger than 18 years, maternal cognitive impairment, maternal inability to read or speak English or Spanish, maternal death, and major congenital anomalies. Overall, 704 infants were enrolled. The study was conducted at 9 university-affiliated NICUs in Providence, Rhode Island; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Kansas City, Missouri; Honolulu, Hawaii; Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and Torrance and Long Beach, California. Data were analyzed from September 2019 to September 2021. Early CUS was performed at 3 to 14 days after birth and late CUS at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age or NICU discharge. Abnormal findings were identified by consensus of standardized radiologists' readings. Neurobehavioral examination was performed using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Among the 704 infants enrolled, 675 had both CUS and NNNS data (135 [20.0%] Black; 368 [54.5%] minority race or ethnicity; 339 [50.2%] White; 376 [55.7%] male; mean [SD] postmenstrual age, 27.0 [1.9] weeks). After covariate adjustment, lower attention (adjusted mean difference, -0.346; 95% CI, -0.609 to -0.083), hypotonicity (mean difference, 0.358; 95% CI, 0.055 to 0.662), and poorer quality of movement (mean difference, -0.344; 95% CI, -0.572 to -0.116) were observed in infants with white matter damage (WMD). Lower attention (mean difference, -0.233; 95% CI, -0.423 to -0.044) and hypotonicity (mean difference, 0.240; 95% CI, 0.014 to 0.465) were observed in infants with early CUS lesions. In this cohort study of preterm infants, certain early CUS lesions were associated with hypotonicity and lower attention around term-equivalent age. WMD was associated with poor attention, hypotonicity, and poor quality of movement. Infants with these CUS lesions might benefit from targeted interventions to improve neurobehavioral outcomes during their NICU hospitalization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35394511
pii: 2790902
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6561
pmc: PMC8994127
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e226561Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD072267
Pays : United States
Références
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):313-8
pubmed: 19117897
Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Dec;37(12):1201-8
pubmed: 17901950
Pediatrics. 2018 Jul;142(1):
pubmed: 29945955
Early Hum Dev. 2013 Sep;89(9):733-7
pubmed: 23787090
Neurology. 2002 Jun 25;58(12):1726-38
pubmed: 12084869
J Perinatol. 2012 Apr;32(4):299-303
pubmed: 21760584
Pediatr Res. 2020 Mar;87(4):721-729
pubmed: 31600769
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Nov;41(7):387-391
pubmed: 28865982
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 May;101(3):F217-22
pubmed: 26307066
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 2):676-8
pubmed: 14993526
Early Hum Dev. 2017 Oct;113:18-22
pubmed: 28711561
J Child Neurol. 2012 Jan;27(1):22-9
pubmed: 22232137
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Jul;105(4):350-356
pubmed: 31690558
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;69(4):6904220010p1-11
pubmed: 26114457
Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):e662-9
pubmed: 18762501
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124(5):1355-62
pubmed: 19822596
Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):e1512-9
pubmed: 17984212
J Pediatr. 2009 Jul;155(1):32-8, 38.e1
pubmed: 19394041
Early Hum Dev. 2015 Oct;91(10):593-9
pubmed: 26246138
Pediatrics. 2019 Sep;144(3):
pubmed: 31462446
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):e90-8
pubmed: 19969621
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Feb;59(2):207-215
pubmed: 27775148
J Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Apr;54(4):420-425
pubmed: 29243326
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 2):668-75
pubmed: 14993525
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):785-92
pubmed: 17908766
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Nov 1;168(9):980-9
pubmed: 18756014
Pediatrics. 2015 Jan;135(1):e32-42
pubmed: 25554820
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178-89
pubmed: 2646488
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Mar;142:104954
pubmed: 32007912
J Pediatr. 2018 Apr;195:59-65.e3
pubmed: 29398046
J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;156(3):366-71
pubmed: 19880137
Front Physiol. 2019 Feb 11;10:64
pubmed: 30804803
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 19;9(1):6322
pubmed: 31004082
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1153-60
pubmed: 19948617
J Child Neurol. 2009 Jan;24(1):63-72
pubmed: 19168819
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Oct 05;1(1):e000136
pubmed: 29637152
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 2):641-67
pubmed: 14993524