Aetiology, secondary prevention strategies and outcomes of ischaemic stroke despite oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.
atrial fibrillation
etiology
outcome
prevention strategies
stroke despite anticoagulation
Journal
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
ISSN: 1468-330X
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985191R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
04
11
2021
accepted:
05
03
2022
pubmed:
10
4
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
entrez:
9
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the aetiology, subsequent preventive strategies and outcomes of stroke despite anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We analysed consecutive patients with AF with an index imaging-proven ischaemic stroke despite vitamin K-antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment across 11 stroke centres. We classified stroke aetiology as: (i) competing stroke mechanism other than AF-related cardioembolism; (ii) insufficient anticoagulation (non-adherence or low anticoagulant activity measured with drug-specific assays); or, (iii) AF-related cardioembolism despite sufficient anticoagulation. We investigated subsequent preventive strategies with regard to the primary (composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, death) and secondary endpoint (recurrent ischaemic stroke) within 3 months after index stroke. Among 2946 patients (median age 81 years; 48% women; 43% VKA, 57% DOAC), stroke aetiology was competing mechanism in 713 patients (24%), insufficient anticoagulation in 934 (32%) and cardioembolism despite sufficient anticoagulation in 1299 (44%). We found high rates of the primary (27% of patients; completeness 91.6%) and secondary endpoint (4.6%; completeness 88.5%). Only DOAC (vs VKA) treatment after index stroke showed lower odds for both endpoints (primary: adjusted OR (aOR) (95% CI) 0.49 (0.32 to 0.73); secondary: 0.44 (0.24 to 0.80)), but not switching between different DOAC types. Adding antiplatelets showed higher odds for both endpoints (primary: aOR (95% CI) 1.99 (1.25 to 3.15); secondary: 2.66 (1.40 to 5.04)). Only few patients (1%) received left atrial appendage occlusion as additional preventive strategy. Stroke despite anticoagulation comprises heterogeneous aetiologies and cardioembolism despite sufficient anticoagulation is most common. While DOAC were associated with better outcomes than VKA, adding antiplatelets was linked to worse outcomes in these high-risk patients. Our findings indicate that individualised and novel preventive strategies beyond the currently available anticoagulants are needed. ISRCTN48292829.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35396339
pii: jnnp-2021-328391
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328391
pmc: PMC9148984
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
588-598Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JFS: grant from Corona-Stiftung, outside the submitted work. CHN: grants from German Ministry of Research and Education, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, German Center for Cardiovascular Research; speaker and/or consultation fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Alexion, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbott, W.L. Gore and Associates. CS: departmental funding from Massachusetts General Hospital for the Neuro-AF study. SY: steering committee member Neuro-AF study, non-funded; research collaboration Medtronic, non-funded. KGH: speaker’s honoraria, consulting fees, lecture honoraria and/or grants from Abbott, Alexion, AMARIN, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, BMS, Biotronik, Medtronic, Premier Research, Portola, W.L. Gore and Associates, Sun Pharma, Edwards Lifesciences. CC: grants from Swiss Heart Foundation (SHF); other support from iSchemaView and Bayer, outside the submitted work. KG: personal fees and/or non-financial support from Alexion Germany GmbH, Abbott Medical, Bayer Vital GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. MK: funding from Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), SHF; contributions from BRAHMS Thermo Fisher, Roche; advisory fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Medtronic. SW: research support from SNSF, Olga Mayenfisch Foundation, University of Zurich CRPP stroke; speaker honoraria from Amgen; travel honoraria from Bayer; research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim. STE: research grants from SNSF, SHF, research support from Daiichi Sankyo; educational grant from Pfizer, compensation from Stago for educational material; travel/speaker honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo; advisory board Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS. PAR: speaker’s honoraria and lecture fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, outside the submitted work. UF: research support from the SNSF (32003B_197009), SHF, Medtronic; consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, CSL Behring; advisory board Portola/Alexion (money paid to institution). BK: consultant fees and travel expenses from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Medtronic, outside the submitted work. JCP: consultation fees and travel expenses from Akcea, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, outside the submitted work. DJS: advisory board for Bayer Switzerland AG and Portola/Alexion, research funding from SNSF, SHF, Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, Swiss Society of Neurology, Bayer Foundation. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):91-99
pubmed: 33280548
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2081-2091
pubmed: 33999547
Ann Neurol. 2019 Jun;85(6):823-834
pubmed: 30980560
J Neuroimaging. 2019 May;29(3):309-322
pubmed: 30702779
Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-2388
pubmed: 33315494
Eur Heart J. 2017 Mar 21;38(12):899-906
pubmed: 28110293
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Jun;26(6):903-e64
pubmed: 30629793
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e005969
pubmed: 32148102
Am Heart J. 2006 Nov;152(5):967-73
pubmed: 17070169
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;92(11):1164-1172
pubmed: 34446528
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jun;11(6):503-11
pubmed: 22572202
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2168-2174
pubmed: 31234756
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;92(10):1062-1067
pubmed: 33903185
Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 21;9:1134
pubmed: 30622509
Eur J Neurol. 2017 May;24(5):719-725
pubmed: 28317289
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200107
pubmed: 32101311
J Pers Med. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):
pubmed: 33440670
Eur Neurol. 2016;76(3-4):187-193
pubmed: 27705975
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8
pubmed: 17947786
Ann Neurol. 2020 Feb 12;:
pubmed: 32052481
Int J Stroke. 2016 Oct;11(7):748-58
pubmed: 27412190
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):
pubmed: 29453305
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Feb;30(2):105530
pubmed: 33333334
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-e467
pubmed: 34024117
Ann Neurol. 2021 Jan;89(1):42-53
pubmed: 32996627
Ann Neurol. 2018 Mar;83(3):451-459
pubmed: 29394504
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Apr;11(4):315-22
pubmed: 22402056
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135
pubmed: 32586585
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 11;9(9):
pubmed: 32932971
Stroke. 2016 Aug;47(8):2075-82
pubmed: 27387994
Atherosclerosis. 2010 Oct;212(2):564-6
pubmed: 20599199
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;26(6):657-665
pubmed: 28317274
Ann Neurol. 2018 May;83(5):873-883
pubmed: 29633334
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Dec;9(12):1157-1163
pubmed: 21059484
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1150-1157
pubmed: 32098607