Varieties of Ignorance: Mystery and the Unknown in Science and Religion.
Ignorance
Mystery
Religion
Science
Unknown
Journal
Cognitive science
ISSN: 1551-6709
Titre abrégé: Cogn Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7708195
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
25
01
2022
received:
27
08
2021
accepted:
05
03
2022
entrez:
10
4
2022
pubmed:
11
4
2022
medline:
13
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
How and why does the moon cause the tides? How and why does God answer prayers? For many, the answer to the former question is unknown; the answer to the latter question is a mystery. Across three studies testing a largely Christian sample within the United States (N = 2524), we investigate attitudes toward ignorance and inquiry as a window onto scientific versus religious belief. In Experiment 1, we find that science and religion are associated with different forms of ignorance: scientific ignorance is typically expressed as a personal unknown ("it's unknown to me"), whereas religious ignorance is expressed as a universal mystery ("it's a mystery"), with scientific unknowns additionally regarded as more viable and valuable targets for inquiry. In Experiment 2, we show that these forms of ignorance are differentially associated with epistemic goals and norms: expressing ignorance in the form of "unknown" (vs. "mystery") more strongly signals epistemic values and achievements. Experiments 2 and 3 additionally show that ignorance is perceived to be a greater threat to science and scientific belief than to religion and religious belief. Together, these studies shed light on the psychological roles of scientific and religious belief in human cognition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35398906
doi: 10.1111/cogs.13129
pmc: PMC9286862
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13129Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS).
Références
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):46-50
pubmed: 17362377
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):698-715
pubmed: 25268465
Cognition. 2012 Jun;123(3):335-46
pubmed: 22481051
Cogn Sci. 2018 Feb 1;:
pubmed: 29388239
Dev Sci. 2006 Jan;9(1):76-96
pubmed: 16445398
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;9(2):144-60
pubmed: 24683418
Cogn Dev. 2014 Apr 1;30(April - June 2014):15-29
pubmed: 24748720
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104273
pubmed: 32388141
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):423-8
pubmed: 21928924
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 May 1;49(3):559-565
pubmed: 23729845
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;108(3):515-29
pubmed: 25402678
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 May;151(5):1199-1218
pubmed: 34928686
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104398
pubmed: 32711182
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Feb;32(2):174-87
pubmed: 16382080
Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):826-835
pubmed: 28358533
Open Mind (Camb). 2021 Sep 10;5:91-99
pubmed: 34746617
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):451-71
pubmed: 12088240
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jan;56(1):117-127
pubmed: 31657588
Dev Psychol. 2016 Jan;52(1):31-45
pubmed: 26479546
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Aug;29(6):614-633
pubmed: 32677865