Physicians' decision-making when managing pediatric patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: A qualitative study.
decision-making
ethics
pediatrics
physicians
prolonged disorders of consciousness
Journal
European journal of neurology
ISSN: 1468-1331
Titre abrégé: Eur J Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9506311
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
03
2022
received:
05
12
2021
accepted:
06
04
2022
pubmed:
11
4
2022
medline:
19
7
2022
entrez:
10
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advances in medicine have resulted in treatments that can extend the survival of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) for several years. However, several diagnostic and prognostic uncertainties remain, particularly in the care of pediatric patients. In the absence of international guidelines, we aimed to explore physicians' decision-making when managing pediatric patients with PDOC. We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured, individual interviews and employed an inductive thematic analytical approach to explore physicians' subjective experiences and decision-making when managing pediatric patients with PDOC. We recruited a purposive sample of 19 Italian-speaking physicians currently or previously employed in intensive care units or pediatric, internal medicine, or neurology departments in Switzerland. Participants stated that making clinical decisions involving pediatric patients with PDOC is extremely challenging, because the decisional process requires finding a balance between several contending factors. We found that physicians experienced ambivalence in three domains of care (time, goals of care, and target of care), and that they were aware of the risk of self-fulfilling prophecies for both prognosis and main clinical outcomes. Our study confirmed that experienced clinicians acknowledge the complex nature and challenge of clinical decision-making in the care of pediatric patients with PDOC. More research is warranted to improve and expand existing guidelines aimed at assisting and facilitating clinical and ethical decision-making, and improving physicians' awareness of the factors affecting their decisions when dealing with patients with PDOC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Advances in medicine have resulted in treatments that can extend the survival of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) for several years. However, several diagnostic and prognostic uncertainties remain, particularly in the care of pediatric patients. In the absence of international guidelines, we aimed to explore physicians' decision-making when managing pediatric patients with PDOC.
METHODS
We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured, individual interviews and employed an inductive thematic analytical approach to explore physicians' subjective experiences and decision-making when managing pediatric patients with PDOC. We recruited a purposive sample of 19 Italian-speaking physicians currently or previously employed in intensive care units or pediatric, internal medicine, or neurology departments in Switzerland.
RESULTS
Participants stated that making clinical decisions involving pediatric patients with PDOC is extremely challenging, because the decisional process requires finding a balance between several contending factors. We found that physicians experienced ambivalence in three domains of care (time, goals of care, and target of care), and that they were aware of the risk of self-fulfilling prophecies for both prognosis and main clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirmed that experienced clinicians acknowledge the complex nature and challenge of clinical decision-making in the care of pediatric patients with PDOC. More research is warranted to improve and expand existing guidelines aimed at assisting and facilitating clinical and ethical decision-making, and improving physicians' awareness of the factors affecting their decisions when dealing with patients with PDOC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35398947
doi: 10.1111/ene.15354
pmc: PMC9544752
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2181-2191Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.
Références
Ann Neurol. 2020 Jan;87(1):12-18
pubmed: 31675139
BMC Neurol. 2009 Jul 21;9:35
pubmed: 19622138
J Nutr Health Aging. 2004;8(3):176-80
pubmed: 15129303
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):535-57
pubmed: 22543420
Perspect Biol Med. 2018;60(3):403-407
pubmed: 29375071
Neurocrit Care. 2013 Dec;19(3):347-63
pubmed: 24132565
Med J Aust. 2016 May 2;204(8):318
pubmed: 27125807
Neuropediatrics. 2019 Apr;50(2):71-79
pubmed: 30572371
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3353-3367
pubmed: 31099444
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138
pubmed: 27809908
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;27(1):27-37, vii-viii
pubmed: 19218017
Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(6):401-10
pubmed: 19943193
Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1181-92
pubmed: 16616561
Pediatrics. 2020 Aug;146(Suppl 1):S66-S69
pubmed: 32737235
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2013 Winter;3(3):261-73
pubmed: 24407134
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 May 17;11:32
pubmed: 21586166
J Med Ethics. 2007 Apr;33(4):215-8
pubmed: 17400619
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;13(5):e311-5
pubmed: 22760427
Medwave. 2018 Sep 26;18(5):e7266
pubmed: 30312289
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):352-4
pubmed: 11159664
Neurology. 2001 Mar 27;56(6):766-72
pubmed: 11274312
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2003 Mar;42(2):139-45
pubmed: 12659387
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Aug;29(8):2181-2191
pubmed: 35398947
J Med Ethics. 2014 Jul;40(7):448-52
pubmed: 23824967
J Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 24;:
pubmed: 32332151
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):116-26
pubmed: 17403758
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Sep;22(3):187-95
pubmed: 26358429
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Mar;17(3):135-156
pubmed: 33318675
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 14;:
pubmed: 33055136
Nurs Sci Q. 2019 Jan;32(1):12-22
pubmed: 30798753
Eur J Neurol. 2020 May;27(5):741-756
pubmed: 32090418
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):103-128
pubmed: 27984278
Can J Neurol Sci. 2010 Nov;37(6):758-68
pubmed: 21059536
Semin Neurol. 2018 Oct;38(5):548-554
pubmed: 30321893
Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1482-9
pubmed: 27058466
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):91
pubmed: 31884958
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;17(4):349-60, x
pubmed: 16344205
Neurology. 2018 Sep 4;91(10):450-460
pubmed: 30089618
Med Educ. 2014 Jan;48(1):34-43
pubmed: 24330115
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Dec 31;84 Suppl 2:S17-24
pubmed: 23347414
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):188-201
pubmed: 26509317
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):600-614
pubmed: 31003899
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860
pubmed: 30403936
Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:537-43
pubmed: 16186047
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jun;39(6):1009-18
pubmed: 23559079
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22914511