Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of a Specific Agility Test and Its Relationship With Physical Fitness in Karate Athletes.
change of direction speed
combat sports
criterion validity
evaluations
sport
Journal
Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
22
12
2021
accepted:
23
02
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
12
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of a developed specific karate agility test (SKAT) and to examine its relationship with physical fitness. A total of 36 karateka voluntarily participated in this study. During two separate sessions, international and national ranked athletes completed the SKAT by performing three changes of direction (CoD): two in a preplanned manner and one in response to a stimulus that was provided by a live tester (Light tester). Assessment of CoD, horizontal jumping ability, 5 and 10 m sprint time, and dynamic balance were also applied during these two occasions. To evaluate SKAT's construct validity, two groups were recruited based on their karate results: High- vs. low-ranked athletes. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the SKAT were examined from the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest worthwhile change (SWC), and receiving operator characteristic analysis. Regarding relative and absolute reliability, the ICC of SKAT was excellent at >0.95 and the SEM was <5%. According to the sensitivity analysis, the power to detect small performance changes can be rated as
Identifiants
pubmed: 35399280
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.841498
pmc: PMC8984015
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
841498Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Ben Hassen, Negra, Uthoff, Chtara and Jarraya.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897-906
pubmed: 2947907
Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15
pubmed: 10907753
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Sep;32(9):2542-2547
pubmed: 29120989
J Sports Sci. 2006 Sep;24(9):919-32
pubmed: 16882626
Sports Med. 2016 Mar;46(3):421-42
pubmed: 26670456
Int J Sports Med. 2017 May;38(5):370-377
pubmed: 28315285
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Mar;31(3):727-735
pubmed: 28186497
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;84(9):719-23
pubmed: 16141752
Asian J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;4(4):263-71
pubmed: 24800001
Gait Posture. 2020 Mar;77:218-224
pubmed: 32059140
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(7):571-8
pubmed: 11822790
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1644-51
pubmed: 19675502
J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jan;12(1):212-4
pubmed: 18069064
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Sep 1;13(8):1000-1004
pubmed: 29345545
Nurs Res. 2002 Jan-Feb;51(1):59-62
pubmed: 11822570
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):
pubmed: 32599790
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 May;13(3):376-8
pubmed: 19576850
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jul;35(7):1232-7
pubmed: 12840647
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005
J Hum Kinet. 2011 Dec;30:107-14
pubmed: 23486746
J Sci Med Sport. 2005 Mar;8(1):52-60
pubmed: 15887901
Sports Med. 2012 Oct 1;42(10):829-43
pubmed: 22901041
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;105(4):309-20
pubmed: 9284239
Coll Antropol. 2006 Jun;30(2):327-33
pubmed: 16848147