Patella-Femoral Joint Revision Surgery Following a Rare and Interesting Case of Implant Failure: A Case Report and Retrospective Analysis of Our Hospitals Implant Data.
: patellofemoral
arthroplasty
femoro-patella vialla
implant failure
knee
revision
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
accepted:
04
03
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
12
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to the national joint registry, patello-femoral joint (PFJ) replacement accounts for 1% of all knee arthroplasty procedures in the UK, 1014 of which were performed in 2018. The femoro-patella vialla (FPV) implant by MicroPort orthopaedics has a high reported rate of revision, more than four times that of other knee replacements. The mechanisms of failure are usually loss of fixation at the bone-implant interface. We observe a rare and unusual case form of patella component failure whereby the facets of the implant remain imbedded within the patella as a result of shear force, leaving a loose patella button within the knee. A literature review was conducted of reported modes of failure of the FPV implant and retrospective analysis of our units' results looking into rate of revision, modes of failure, and assessment of a single surgeon's patient outcome measure (Knee Society Scores). Retrospective analysis of our hospital's data revealed that 11% of FPV implants were revised in our unit, a large percentage of which were due to pain and progressive osteoarthritis. We observed revision rates of 5.84% at 3 years, 10.21% at 5 years, and 13.13% at 10 years, which is favourable to national joint registry revision estimates of 6.99%, 10.13%, and 19.10%, respectively. Knee Society Scores reveal a mean improvement of 39.65 (-38 to 100) at follow-up following FPV unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. Our unit demonstrated better results from patient outcome measures when compared to literature and a lower rate of revision when compared to national figures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35399458
doi: 10.7759/cureus.22908
pmc: PMC8985186
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e22908Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Nadimi et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jun;95-B(6):793-7
pubmed: 23723274
Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):2-8
pubmed: 27825938
Acta Orthop. 2019 Oct;90(5):473-478
pubmed: 31259645
Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1272-1277
pubmed: 30193976
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):158-65
pubmed: 15534537
Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):482-4
pubmed: 23953660
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jun;20(6):1104-9
pubmed: 22009560