A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Biomedical Mg Alloy and Surface Coatings in Orthopedic Application.
Journal
Bioinorganic chemistry and applications
ISSN: 1565-3633
Titre abrégé: Bioinorg Chem Appl
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101200445
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
01
2022
accepted:
19
02
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
12
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Magnesium alloys have great application prospects as ideal bone implant materials. However, their poor corrosion resistance limits their clinical orthopedic application. Surface modification promotes the corrosion resistance of magnesium. Conversion coatings, such as calcium phosphate (Ca-P) coating, microarc oxidation (MAO) treatment, and fluoride (FLU) treatment, have been extensively investigated in in vivo studies. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the influence of different conversion coatings on bone repair, material properties, and systemic host response in orthopedic applications. Using the PICOS model, the inclusion criteria for biodegradable magnesium and its alloys were determined for in vivo studies. Four databases were used. The standard and weight mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze new bone formation and degradation rate. Network structure and forest plots were created, and ranking probabilities were estimated. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using SYRCLE, CERQual, and GRADE tools. In the qualitative analysis, 43 studies were selected, and the evaluation of each outcome indicator was not entirely consistent from article to article. In the quantitative analysis, 21 articles were subjected to network meta-analysis, with 16 articles on implant degradation and 8 articles for new bone formation. Additionally, SUCRA indicated that Ca-P coating exhibited the highest corrosion resistance, followed by FLU treatment. MAO demonstrated the best capability for new bone formation, followed by Ca-P coating. Ca-P coating exhibited the highest overall performance. To conclude, coated Mg can promote better new bone formation than bare Mg and has considerable biocompatibility. Ca-P-coated Mg and MAO-coated Mg have the greatest potential to significantly promote corrosion resistance and bone regeneration, respectively. The findings of this study will provide a theoretical basis for the investigation of composite coatings and guidance for the orthopedic application of Mg bone implants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35399618
doi: 10.1155/2022/4529520
pmc: PMC8991394
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
4529520Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 XinYue Lu et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Biomater Appl. 2012 Aug;27(2):153-64
pubmed: 21363872
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Jun 1;75:1268-1280
pubmed: 28415416
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 09;13:35
pubmed: 23496991
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Feb;14(2):113-20
pubmed: 16467186
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018 Aug 17;29(9):138
pubmed: 30120628
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):163-71
pubmed: 20688472
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;45(6):862-871
pubmed: 28457825
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 26;14:43
pubmed: 24667063
Biomaterials. 2000 Dec;21(24):2615-21
pubmed: 11071611
Lab Anim. 2011 Oct;45(4):225-30
pubmed: 21737463
Biomed Mater. 2015 Aug 04;10(4):045015
pubmed: 26238295
Biomaterials. 2005 Jun;26(17):3557-63
pubmed: 15621246
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015 May;26(5):184
pubmed: 25893390
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;49(2):272-283
pubmed: 31227276
Acta Biomater. 2012 Jul;8(7):2442-55
pubmed: 22510401
Biomed Mater. 2015 Apr 17;10(2):025008
pubmed: 25886380
J Orthop Sci. 2020 Nov;25(6):1107-1115
pubmed: 32220468
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015 May;26(5):189
pubmed: 25917827
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Nov;87:68-79
pubmed: 30041141
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Mar 14;11:30
pubmed: 26975841
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Apr 29;9:652334
pubmed: 33996780
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 Jan;100(1):206-16
pubmed: 22102519
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:838356
pubmed: 24971093
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0187271
pubmed: 29324741
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 Aug;105(6):1636-1644
pubmed: 27174442
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 01;20(15):
pubmed: 31374825
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 May;103(5):1798-808
pubmed: 25203515
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Aug 1;77:1261-1274
pubmed: 28532004
Regen Biomater. 2015 Jun;2(2):135-51
pubmed: 26816637
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 28;21(9):
pubmed: 32353983
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jun;63:450-61
pubmed: 27040239
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019 Sep 1;181:349-359
pubmed: 31158697
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;44(3):309-17
pubmed: 26805919
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 04;13(18):
pubmed: 32899725
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 May;62:634-42
pubmed: 26952467
J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2019 Jun 1;15(6):1172-1184
pubmed: 31072426
Am J Nurs. 2014 Mar;114(3):53-8
pubmed: 24572533
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017 Oct 1;158:147-156
pubmed: 28688364
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jun;63:506-11
pubmed: 27040245
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jul;22(4):1516-7
pubmed: 21778852
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895
pubmed: 26506244
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 13;13(6):
pubmed: 32183231
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Oct;37(10):2118-25
pubmed: 23021176
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013 Dec 1;33(8):4833-41
pubmed: 24094194
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Jun 1;75:1068-1074
pubmed: 28415391
Acta Biomater. 2018 Jan;65:486-500
pubmed: 29079514
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013 Oct;33(7):3881-8
pubmed: 23910291
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 May 1;86:42-47
pubmed: 29525095
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Nov 1;68:948-963
pubmed: 27524097
J Child Orthop. 2021 Jun 1;15(3):194-203
pubmed: 34211595
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68
pubmed: 22818160
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Nov;104:109926
pubmed: 31499938
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012 Feb;100(2):293-304
pubmed: 22045631
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jan 1;58:799-811
pubmed: 26478374
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015 Mar;48:21-7
pubmed: 25579892
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Feb;102(2):429-41
pubmed: 23533169
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):296-303
pubmed: 28960817
Anim Health Res Rev. 2019 Dec;20(2):229-246
pubmed: 32081123
Scanning. 2021 May 3;2021:5530788
pubmed: 34025899
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):3263-72
pubmed: 23706209
Acta Biomater. 2013 Feb;9(2):5411-20
pubmed: 23022544
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jul;22(4):1502-3
pubmed: 21778846
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 03;9(7):e99682
pubmed: 24992266
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 03;8(10):e76654
pubmed: 24098547
Biomaterials. 2007 Oct;28(29):4240-50
pubmed: 17644173
Materials (Basel). 2017 Sep 30;10(10):
pubmed: 28973984
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2021 Oct;89:105480
pubmed: 34530377
Bioact Mater. 2021 Apr 20;6(11):4027-4052
pubmed: 33997491