Judgment and Embodied Cognition of Lawyers. Moral Decision-Making and Interoceptive Physiology in the Legal Field.

interoception lawyers legal reasoning moral decision-making ultimatum game

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 12 01 2022
accepted: 08 03 2022
entrez: 11 4 2022
pubmed: 12 4 2022
medline: 12 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Past research showed that the ability to focus on one's internal states (e.g., interoceptive ability) positively correlates with the self-regulation of behavior in situations that are accompanied by somatic and/or physiological changes, such as emotions, physical workload, and decision-making. The analysis of moral oriented decision-making can be the first step for better understanding the legal reasoning carried on by the main players in the field, as lawyers are. For this reason, this study investigated the influence of the decision context and interoceptive manipulation on the moral decision-making process in the legal field gathering the responses of two groups of lawyers. A total of 20 lawyers were randomly divided into an experimental group (EXP), which was explicitly required to focus the attention on its interoceptive correlates, and a control group (CON), which only received the general instruction to perform the task. Both groups underwent a modified version of the Ultimatum Game (UG), where are presented three different moral conditions (professional, company, and social) and three different offers (fair, unfair, and equal). Results highlighted a significant increase of Acceptance Rate (AR) in those offers that should be considered more equal than fair or unfair ones, associated with a general increase of Reaction Times (RTs) in the equal offers. Furthermore, the interoceptive manipulation oriented the Lawyers toward a more self-centered decision. This study shows how individual, situational, contextual, and interoceptive factors may influence the moral decision-making of lawyers. Future research in the so-called Neurolaw field is needed to replicate and expand current findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35401313
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853342
pmc: PMC8987697
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

853342

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Angioletti, Tormen and Balconi.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):6889-92
pubmed: 21482790
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1336-1348
pubmed: 33123863
Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):
pubmed: 31514304
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708):
pubmed: 28080975
Psychophysiology. 2007 Mar;44(2):194-202
pubmed: 17343703
Physiol Behav. 2015 Mar 1;140:54-60
pubmed: 25497886
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Oct;230(2):233-41
pubmed: 23873493
J Integr Neurosci. 2022 Jan 28;21(1):34
pubmed: 35164470
Psychophysiology. 2009 Nov;46(6):1123-9
pubmed: 19558399
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Jan;8(1):15-26
pubmed: 22689216
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66
pubmed: 12154366
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 29;359(1451):1709-26
pubmed: 15590612
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40
pubmed: 11805825
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):255-9
pubmed: 23548985
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 15;7(1):15652
pubmed: 29142226
Front Neurosci. 2011 Apr 18;5:49
pubmed: 21559066
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1835-44
pubmed: 21106893
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1413-20
pubmed: 8941953
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Apr 3;2021:5585060
pubmed: 33884043
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):692-704
pubmed: 22389201
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Aug;103:267-304
pubmed: 31125635
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34
pubmed: 11699120
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010 Mar;81(1):108-12
pubmed: 20387405
Biopsychosoc Med. 2020 Mar 17;14:7
pubmed: 32206084

Auteurs

Laura Angioletti (L)

International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Federico Tormen (F)

International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Michela Balconi (M)

International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH