Impact of Pre-Anthesis Drought Stress on Physiology, Yield-Related Traits, and Drought-Responsive Genes in Green Super Rice.

anthesis correlation drought drought-responsive genes grain yield pollen fertility

Journal

Frontiers in genetics
ISSN: 1664-8021
Titre abrégé: Front Genet
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560621

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 10 12 2021
accepted: 27 01 2022
entrez: 11 4 2022
pubmed: 12 4 2022
medline: 12 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Optimum soil water availability is vital for maximum yield production in rice which is challenged by increasing spells of drought. The reproductive stage drought is among the main limiting factors leading to the drastic reduction in grain yield. The objective of this study was to investigate the molecular and morphophysiological responses of pre-anthesis stage drought stress in green super rice. The study assessed the performance of 26 rice lines under irrigated and drought conditions. Irrigated treatment was allowed to grow normally, while drought stress was imposed for 30 days at the pre-anthesis stage. Three important physiological traits including pollen fertility percentage (PFP), cell membrane stability (CMS), and normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) were recorded at anthesis stage during the last week of drought stress. Agronomic traits of economic importance including grain yield were recorded at maturity stage. The analysis of variance demonstrated significant variation among the genotypes for most of the studied traits. Correlation and principal component analyses demonstrated highly significant associations of particular agronomic traits with grain yield, and genetic diversity among genotypes, respectively. Our study demonstrated a higher drought tolerance potential of GSR lines compared with local cultivars, mainly by higher pollen viability, plant biomass, CMS, and harvest index under drought. In addition, the molecular basis of drought tolerance in GSR lines was related to upregulation of certain drought-responsive genes including

Identifiants

pubmed: 35401708
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.832542
pii: 832542
pmc: PMC8987348
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

832542

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ahmad, Zafar, Naeem, Shokat, Inam, Rehman, Naveed, Xu, Li, Ali and Khan.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Biotechnol Lett. 2008 Dec;30(12):2191-8
pubmed: 18779926
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 30;21(9):
pubmed: 32365765
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):400
pubmed: 32867688
J Exp Bot. 2020 Jan 7;71(2):470-479
pubmed: 31644801
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;37(11):1344-1350
pubmed: 31659337
Plant J. 2010 Apr;62(2):316-29
pubmed: 20128882
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8227
pubmed: 28811489
Plant J. 2009 Jun;58(5):803-16
pubmed: 19220793
PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0156362
pubmed: 27223810
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 24;15(5):
pubmed: 29695095
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2009;11(2):81-100
pubmed: 19366999
Plant Cell Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):575-589
pubmed: 29361060
BMC Genomics. 2013 Feb 12;14:93
pubmed: 23398910
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 May;133(5):1427-1442
pubmed: 31915875
Plant Cell. 2011 Jan;23(1):111-29
pubmed: 21282525
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3890
pubmed: 30846745
Plant Physiol. 2010 Feb;152(2):876-90
pubmed: 20007444
Genomics. 2021 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):1029-1043
pubmed: 33157261
Plant Mol Biol. 2017 Jan;93(1-2):21-34
pubmed: 27718117
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16402-9
pubmed: 17923667
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(1):356-375
pubmed: 31433495
BMC Genomics. 2014 Nov 26;15:1026
pubmed: 25428615
Plant Genome. 2015 Nov;8(3):eplantgenome2014.12.0094
pubmed: 33228268
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jul;141(3):924-31
pubmed: 16714407
Funct Plant Biol. 2020 Apr;47(5):440-453
pubmed: 32209204
Plants (Basel). 2021 Feb 04;10(2):
pubmed: 33557079
DNA Res. 2019 Apr 1;26(2):119-130
pubmed: 30590457
J Proteomics. 2020 Aug 30;226:103895
pubmed: 32652220
Plant Mol Biol. 2009 Jul;70(4):443-56
pubmed: 19322663
Plant Physiol. 2010 Nov;154(3):1128-42
pubmed: 20841452
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Aug;19(8):505-517
pubmed: 29872215
Plant Physiol. 2021 Apr 23;185(4):1722-1744
pubmed: 33793928
Genomics. 2007 Jun;89(6):697-707
pubmed: 17408920
Plant J. 2007 Aug;51(4):617-30
pubmed: 17587305
BMC Genomics. 2015 Feb 21;16:111
pubmed: 25765449

Auteurs

Hassaan Ahmad (H)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Syed Adeel Zafar (SA)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Muhammad Kashif Naeem (MK)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Sajid Shokat (S)

Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Safeena Inam (S)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Malik Attique Ur Rehman (MAU)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Shahzad Amir Naveed (SA)

Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Jianlong Xu (J)

Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Zhikang Li (Z)

Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Ghulam Muhammad Ali (GM)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Muhammad Ramzan Khan (MR)

National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Classifications MeSH