Characterizing Extremely Negative Reviews of Ophthalmologists on Yelp.Com.

Healthcare delivery online reviews ophthalmology patient satisfaction practice management

Journal

Seminars in ophthalmology
ISSN: 1744-5205
Titre abrégé: Semin Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jul 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 12 4 2022
medline: 28 7 2022
entrez: 11 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To perform a retrospective characterization of one-star reviews of ophthalmologists on Yelp.com and to increase understanding of patient complaints on Yelp.com. A search was performed for reviews on Yelp.com using the keyword "ophthalmologist" for the top 8 most population-dense metropolitan areas in the United States. One-star reviews were collected and classified as procedural or nonprocedural. Complaints were also categorized as clinical, nonclinical, or both. Clinical complaints cited issues such as complications, reoperations, uncontrolled pain, misdiagnosis, unclear treatment plan, etc. Nonclinical complaints included comments such as physician bedside manner, other staff interpersonal manner, wait time, brevity of appointment time, etc. 5,532 total reviews were assessed, of which 477 (9%) one-star reviews were included in the study for analysis. These reviews amounted to 1,120 distinct complaints. 287 (26%) were clinical in nature and 833 (74%) were nonclinical. Technical incompetence or error (50: 4%), unsatisfactory results (46: 4%), and complications (43: 4%) represented the most common clinical complaints while office staff interpersonal manner (182: 16%), wait time (174: 16%), and physician interpersonal manner (141: 13%) were the most common nonclinical complaints. Refractive surgery was the most frequently mentioned subspecialty (89: 8%). Patients undergoing an ophthalmic procedure (surgery, injection, etc.) wrote 64 reviews that resulted in 193 (17%) complaints. Nonprocedural patients wrote 413 reviews that resulted in 927 (83%) complaints. Compared with procedural reviews, nonprocedural reviews were less likely to include a clinical complaint (rate ratio, 0.3: The majority of one-star reviews of ophthalmologists included in this study were nonclinical. Complaints referencing a procedural episode were more likely to include a clinical component in the review. In the era of intense medical consumerism and increased physician and health care institution competition for patient acquisition and retention, the characterization of excessively negative reviews allows identification of potential areas of concern for patients that use online review sites such as Yelp.com.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35403560
doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2064193
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

661-667

Auteurs

Jacob F Smith (JF)

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Ami A Shah (AA)

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Muhammad B Qureshi (MB)

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Hanna N Luong (HN)

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Olufunmilola Adeleye (O)

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Olufemi E Adams (OE)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Joanne F Shen (JF)

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH