The role of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate-mediated glycolysis/gluconeogenesis genes in cancer prognosis.
ALDOA
FBP1
bioinformatics
cancer metabolism
prognosis
Journal
Aging
ISSN: 1945-4589
Titre abrégé: Aging (Albany NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101508617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 04 2022
11 04 2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
accepted:
25
03
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
23
4
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metabolic reprogramming and elevated glycolysis levels are associated with tumor progression. However, despite cancer cells selectively inhibiting or expressing certain metabolic enzymes, it is unclear whether differences in gene profiles influence patient outcomes. Therefore, identifying the differences in enzyme action may facilitate discovery of gene ontology variations to characterize tumors. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (F-1,6-BP) is an important intermediate in glucose metabolism, particularly in cancer. Gluconeogenesis and glycolysis require fructose-1,6-bisphosphonates 1 (FBP1) and fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A (ALDOA), which participate in F-1,6-BP conversion. Increased expression of ALDOA and decreased expression of FBP1 are associated with the progression of various forms of cancer in humans. However, the exact molecular mechanism by which ALDOA and FBP1 are involved in the switching of F-1,6-BP is not yet known. As a result of their pancancer pattern, the relationship between ALDOA and FBP1 in patient prognosis is reversed, particularly in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC). Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we observed that FBP1 expression was low in patients with LUAD and LIHC tumors, which was distinct from ALDOA. A similar trend was observed in the analysis of Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) datasets. By dissecting downstream networks and possible upstream regulators, using ALDOA and FBP1 as the core, we identified common signatures and interaction events regulated by ALDOA and FBP1. Notably, the identified effectors dominated by ALDOA or FBP1 were distributed in opposite patterns and can be considered independent prognostic indicators for patients with LUAD and LIHC. Therefore, uncovering the effectors between ALDOA and FBP1 will lead to novel therapeutic strategies for cancer patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35404841
pii: 204010
doi: 10.18632/aging.204010
pmc: PMC9037270
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fructosediphosphates
0
Fructose
30237-26-4
FBP1 protein, human
EC 3.1.3.11
Fructose-Bisphosphatase
EC 3.1.3.11
ALDOA protein, human
EC 4.1.2.13
Fructose-Bisphosphate Aldolase
EC 4.1.2.13
fructose-1,6-diphosphate
M7522JYX1H
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3233-3258Références
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61262
pubmed: 23620736
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;45(6):2471-2482
pubmed: 29554660
Cancer Cell. 2013 Mar 18;23(3):316-31
pubmed: 23453623
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0167857
pubmed: 27978536
Mol Carcinog. 2014 Feb;53(2):138-44
pubmed: 22949271
Genome Med. 2017 Dec 22;9(1):117
pubmed: 29273096
Mol Cell Biochem. 2016 Jan;411(1-2):331-40
pubmed: 26546081
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Dec;79(938):672-80
pubmed: 14707241
Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 1;76(11):3265-76
pubmed: 27197151
J Cell Biochem. 2019 Aug;120(8):13694-13705
pubmed: 31081974
Oncogene. 2019 Jan;38(4):483-496
pubmed: 30171256
Cancer Sci. 2020 Aug;111(8):3071-3081
pubmed: 32530543
Cell Metab. 2018 Dec 4;28(6):848-865.e6
pubmed: 30174307
Cell Death Dis. 2020 Mar 18;11(3):195
pubmed: 32188842
BioData Min. 2017 Feb 7;10:6
pubmed: 28191039
Am J Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 01;7(11):2121-2130
pubmed: 29218237
Neoplasma. 2020 Sep;67(5):982-991
pubmed: 32453596
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 28;7:368
pubmed: 32984358
Mol Med Rep. 2017 Dec;16(6):8563-8571
pubmed: 28990097
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43(1):31-38
pubmed: 28848200
Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 15;79(18):4754-4766
pubmed: 31358528
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014 Dec;63(12):1347-8
pubmed: 25056820
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1461-1479
pubmed: 33813748
J Cell Mol Med. 2018 Sep;22(9):4377-4386
pubmed: 29992789
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Feb 27;13:279-285
pubmed: 28280347
Nat Cell Biol. 2020 Jun;22(6):728-739
pubmed: 32367049
Carcinogenesis. 2017 Feb 1;38(2):134-143
pubmed: 27742690
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Feb;12(1):174-183
pubmed: 33708434
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Jun 7;500(3):691-697
pubmed: 29678579
Reprod Sci. 2019 Mar;26(3):428-435
pubmed: 29779471
Oncol Lett. 2017 May;13(5):3046-3056
pubmed: 28529559
Cancer Lett. 2017 Sep 10;403:28-36
pubmed: 28610954
Cancer Res. 2020 Feb 15;80(4):657-658
pubmed: 32060227
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;183(1):71-82
pubmed: 32601971
Cancer Lett. 2016 Apr 28;374(1):127-135
pubmed: 26854714
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 10;2018:3726091
pubmed: 29984231
Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26:154-8
pubmed: 16789469
Cancer Invest. 2015 May;33(5):197-204
pubmed: 25844935
Lancet. 2001 Feb 17;357(9255):539-45
pubmed: 11229684
Cancer Cell Int. 2019 Jul 30;19:202
pubmed: 31384177
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 10;37(1):224
pubmed: 30201002
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Nov;64(11):3215-3227
pubmed: 31041640
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Nov;6(Suppl 1):S27
pubmed: 30613602
Int J Oncol. 2017 Feb;50(2):525-534
pubmed: 28000858
Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 15;76(14):4259-4269
pubmed: 27261507
Chin J Cancer. 2017 Apr 3;36(1):38
pubmed: 28372569
Cell. 2000 Jan 7;100(1):57-70
pubmed: 10647931
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 May 8;38(1):18
pubmed: 29764507
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25564
pubmed: 22039417
Cell Cycle. 2019 Oct;18(19):2432-2446
pubmed: 31448674