Environmental variation drives the decoupling of leaf and root traits within species along an elevation gradient.
Elevation gradient
intraspecific trait variation
leaf traits
root traits
trait correlations
trait covariation
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 09 2022
19 09 2022
Historique:
received:
10
02
2022
accepted:
06
04
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
23
9
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plant performance is enhanced by balancing above- and below-ground resource uptake through the intraspecific adjustment of leaf and root traits. It is assumed that these organ adjustments are at least partly coordinated, so that analogous leaf and root traits broadly covary. Understanding the extent of such intraspecific leaf-root trait covariation would strongly contribute to our understanding of how plants match above- and below-ground resource use strategies as their environment changes, but comprehensive studies are lacking. We measured analogous leaf and root traits from 11 species, as well as climate, soil and vegetation properties along a 1000-m elevation gradient in the French Alps. We determined how traits varied along the gradient, to what extent this variation was determined by the way different traits respond to environmental cues acting at different spatial scales (i.e. within and between elevations), and whether trait pairs covaried within species. Leaf and root trait patterns strongly diverged: across the 11 species along the gradient, intraspecific leaf trait patterns were largely consistent, whereas root trait patterns were highly idiosyncratic. We also observed that, when compared with leaves, intraspecific variation was greater in root traits, due to the strong effects of the local environment (i.e. at the same elevation), while landscape-level effects (i.e. at different elevations) were minor. Overall, intraspecific trait correlations between analogous leaf and root traits were nearly absent. Our study suggests that environmental gradients at the landscape level, as well as local heterogeneity in soil properties, are the drivers of a strong decoupling between analogous leaf and root traits within species. This decoupling of plant resource acquisition strategies highlights how plants can exhibit diverse whole-plant acclimation strategies to modify above- and below-ground resource uptake, improving their resilience to environmental change.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Plant performance is enhanced by balancing above- and below-ground resource uptake through the intraspecific adjustment of leaf and root traits. It is assumed that these organ adjustments are at least partly coordinated, so that analogous leaf and root traits broadly covary. Understanding the extent of such intraspecific leaf-root trait covariation would strongly contribute to our understanding of how plants match above- and below-ground resource use strategies as their environment changes, but comprehensive studies are lacking.
METHODS
We measured analogous leaf and root traits from 11 species, as well as climate, soil and vegetation properties along a 1000-m elevation gradient in the French Alps. We determined how traits varied along the gradient, to what extent this variation was determined by the way different traits respond to environmental cues acting at different spatial scales (i.e. within and between elevations), and whether trait pairs covaried within species.
KEY RESULTS
Leaf and root trait patterns strongly diverged: across the 11 species along the gradient, intraspecific leaf trait patterns were largely consistent, whereas root trait patterns were highly idiosyncratic. We also observed that, when compared with leaves, intraspecific variation was greater in root traits, due to the strong effects of the local environment (i.e. at the same elevation), while landscape-level effects (i.e. at different elevations) were minor. Overall, intraspecific trait correlations between analogous leaf and root traits were nearly absent.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests that environmental gradients at the landscape level, as well as local heterogeneity in soil properties, are the drivers of a strong decoupling between analogous leaf and root traits within species. This decoupling of plant resource acquisition strategies highlights how plants can exhibit diverse whole-plant acclimation strategies to modify above- and below-ground resource uptake, improving their resilience to environmental change.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35405006
pii: 6566494
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac052
pmc: PMC9486920
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
419-430Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13730-4
pubmed: 9391094
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):91-95
pubmed: 28117440
Nature. 2011 Oct 19;479(7374):517-20
pubmed: 22012261
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2473-2481
pubmed: 28208238
New Phytol. 2005 Apr;166(1):73-82
pubmed: 15760352
Nature. 2011 Feb 24;470(7335):479-85
pubmed: 21350480
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug;5(8):1123-1134
pubmed: 34112996
Oecologia. 2017 May;184(1):1-12
pubmed: 28101635
New Phytol. 2016 Sep;211(4):1159-69
pubmed: 27174359
Science. 2017 Sep 1;357(6354):917-921
pubmed: 28860384
New Phytol. 2021 Nov;232(3):973-1122
pubmed: 34608637
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7878):683-687
pubmed: 34588667
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 1;6(27):
pubmed: 32937432
Am Nat. 2004 May;163(5):654-71
pubmed: 15122485
New Phytol. 2018 Sep;219(4):1338-1352
pubmed: 29856482
Ecol Lett. 2021 Oct;24(10):2267-2281
pubmed: 34216183
New Phytol. 2021 Oct;232(1):42-59
pubmed: 34197626
Ann Bot. 2005 Nov;96(6):1129-36
pubmed: 16159941
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Feb 08;14(1):54
pubmed: 33557933
Am J Bot. 2017 Jun;104(6):803-816
pubmed: 28611072
New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):863-72
pubmed: 24824672
Ann Bot. 2021 Mar 24;127(4):397-410
pubmed: 33507251
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2874-2885
pubmed: 30463140
Ecol Lett. 2010 Jul;13(7):838-48
pubmed: 20482582
Oecologia. 2019 Apr;189(4):1017-1026
pubmed: 30848353
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1247-60
pubmed: 25783781
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1389-99
pubmed: 23923502
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(2):543-53
pubmed: 20649915
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Sep;30(9):1052-71
pubmed: 17661747
New Phytol. 2012 Sep;195(4):823-831
pubmed: 22686426
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
pubmed: 15103368
New Phytol. 2012 Sep;195(4):725-727
pubmed: 22861183
New Phytol. 2000 Dec;148(3):353-354
pubmed: 33863017
Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;3(4):1065-78
pubmed: 23610644
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jun 30;8(7):
pubmed: 31262042
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Oct 21;4:415
pubmed: 24155751
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 29;8:898
pubmed: 28611812
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0148788
pubmed: 26867213
Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Dec;5(12):537-42
pubmed: 11120476
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jun;22(6):946-953
pubmed: 30891910
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jul 12;8:1196
pubmed: 28747919
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Sep;21(9):3489-98
pubmed: 25828794
Tree Physiol. 2013 Mar;33(3):297-310
pubmed: 23370548
New Phytol. 2009;182(3):565-588
pubmed: 19434804