Persistence of immunogenicity after seven COVID-19 vaccines given as third dose boosters following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 or BNT162b2 in the UK: Three month analyses of the COV-BOOST trial.
COVID-19 vaccine
Fractional dose
Heterologous boost
Homologous boost
Immunogenicity
Persistence
Third dose
Journal
The Journal of infection
ISSN: 1532-2742
Titre abrégé: J Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7908424
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
17
03
2022
revised:
04
04
2022
accepted:
05
04
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the persistence of immunogenicity three months after third dose boosters. COV-BOOST is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial of seven COVID-19 vaccines used as a third booster dose. The analysis was conducted using all randomised participants who were SARS-CoV-2 naïve during the study. Amongst the 2883 participants randomised, there were 2422 SARS-CoV-2 naïve participants until D84 visit included in the analysis with median age of 70 (IQR: 30-94) years. In the participants who had two initial doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca; hereafter referred to as ChAd), schedules using mRNA vaccines as third dose have the highest anti-spike IgG at D84 (e.g. geometric mean concentration of 8674 ELU/ml (95% CI: 7461-10,085) following ChAd/ChAd/BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNtech, hearafter referred to as BNT)). However, in people who had two initial doses of BNT there was no significant difference at D84 in people given ChAd versus BNT (geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 0.95 (95%CI: 0.78, 1.15). Also, people given Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen; hereafter referred to as Ad26) as a third dose had significantly higher anti-spike IgG at D84 than BNT (GMR of 1.20, 95%CI: 1.01,1.43). Responses at D84 between people who received BNT (15 μg) or BNT (30 μg) after ChAd/ChAd or BNT/BNT were similar, with anti-spike IgG GMRs of half-BNT (15 μg) versus BNT (30 μg) ranging between 0.74-0.86. The decay rate of cellular responses were similar between all the vaccine schedules and doses. 84 days after a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine the decay rates of humoral response were different between vaccines. Adenoviral vector vaccine anti-spike IgG concentrations at D84 following BNT/BNT initial doses were similar to or even higher than for a three dose (BNT/BNT/BNT) schedule. Half dose BNT immune responses were similar to full dose responses. While high antibody tires are desirable in situations of high transmission of new variants of concern, the maintenance of immune responses that confer long-lasting protection against severe disease or death is also of critical importance. Policymakers may also consider adenoviral vector, fractional dose of mRNA, or other non-mRNA vaccines as third doses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35405168
pii: S0163-4453(22)00200-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.018
pmc: PMC8993491
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ad26COVS1
JT2NS6183B
Antibodies, Viral
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Viral Vaccines
0
mRNA Vaccines
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
795-813Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19026
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N013204/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N026993/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest KC acts on behalf of University Hospital Southampton as an investigator on studies funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi and Valneva. She receives no personal financial payment for this work. SNF acts on behalf of University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust as an Investigator and/or providing consultative advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 and other vaccines funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Seqirus, Sanofi, Medimmune, Merck and Valneva vaccines and antimicrobials. He receives no personal financial payment for this work. ALG is named as an inventor on a patent covering use of a particular promoter construct that is often used in ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines and is incorporated in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. ALG may benefit from royalty income paid to the University of Oxford from sales of this vaccine by AstraZeneca and its sublicensees under the University's revenue sharing policy. JH has received payments for presentations for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Ciple & Teva. VL acts on behalf of University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust as an Investigator on clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Valneva. He receives no personal financial payment for this work. PM acts on behalf of University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and The Adam Practice as an investigator on studies funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Medicago and Sanofi. He received no personal financial payment for this work. JSN-V-T is seconded to the Department of Health and Social Care, England until 31st March 2022. MR has provided post marketing surveillance reports on vaccines for Pfizer and GSK for which a cost recover charge is made. MDS acts on behalf of the University of Oxford as an investigator on studies funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Novavax. Janssen, Medimmune and MCM vaccines. He received no personal financial payment for this work.
Références
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 21;71(4):139-145
pubmed: 35085224
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):639-651
pubmed: 35060999
Cell Mol Immunol. 2022 Mar;19(3):447-448
pubmed: 35043006
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7898):664-670
pubmed: 35016195
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546
pubmed: 35249272
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):492-494
pubmed: 34965337
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):831-837
pubmed: 35045566
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):472-476
pubmed: 35042228
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-2040
pubmed: 34588689
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;10(2):
pubmed: 35214789
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):477-480
pubmed: 35046572
Lancet. 2022 Jan 15;399(10321):234-236
pubmed: 34942101
Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):856-869
pubmed: 34370971
Cell. 2022 Mar 3;185(5):847-859.e11
pubmed: 35139340
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):698-700
pubmed: 35021005
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 04;71(9):352-358
pubmed: 35239634
Cell. 2022 May 26;185(11):1875-1887.e8
pubmed: 35523182