Effects of Postbiotics and Paraprobiotics as Replacements for Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Small Intestine Histomorphology, Immune Status and Hepatic Growth Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens.
antibiotics
broiler chickens
carcass
growth performance
histomorphology
immune status
paraprobiotics
postbiotics
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Apr 2022
03 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
16
03
2022
revised:
31
03
2022
accepted:
01
04
2022
entrez:
12
4
2022
pubmed:
13
4
2022
medline:
13
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: This experiment was designed to investigate how replacing antibiotics with postbiotics and paraprobiotics could affect growth performance, small intestine morphology, immune status, and hepatic growth gene expression in broiler chickens. Methods: The experiment followed a completely randomized design (CRD) in which eight treatments were replicated six times with seven birds per replicate. A total of 336, one-day-old (COBB 500) chicks were fed with the eight treatment diets, which include T1 = negative control (Basal diet), T2 = positive control (Basal diet + 0.01% (w/w) Oxytetracycline), T3 = Basal diet + 0.2% (v/w) postbiotic TL1, T4 = Basal diet + 0.2% (v/w) postbiotic RS5, T5 = Basal diet + 0.2% (v/w) paraprobiotic RG11, T6 = Basal diet + 0.2% (v/w) postbiotic RI11, T7 = Basal diet + 0.2% (v/w) paraprobiotic RG14, T8 = Basal diet + 0.2% (v/w) paraprobiotic RI11, for 35 days in a closed house system. Results: The growth performance indicators (final body weight, cumulative weight gain, and feed conversion ratio) were not significantly (p > 0.05) affected by the dietary treatments. However, feed intake recorded a significant (p < 0.05) change in the starter and finisher phases across the dietary treatments. Paraprobiotic RG14 had significantly (p < 0.05) lower abdominal fat and intestines. Villi heights were significantly (p < 0.05) increased, while the crypt depth decreased significantly due to dietary treatments. The dietary treatments significantly influenced colon mucosa sIgA (p < 0.05). Similarly, plasma immunoglobulin IgM level recorded significant (p < 0.05) changes at the finisher phase. In this current study, the hepatic GHR and IGF-1 expressions were significantly (p < 0.05) increased by postbiotics and paraprobiotics supplementation. Conclusions: Therefore, it was concluded that postbiotics and paraprobiotics differ in their effect on broiler chickens. However, they can replace antibiotics without compromising the growth performance, carcass yield, and immune status of broiler chickens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35405905
pii: ani12070917
doi: 10.3390/ani12070917
pmc: PMC8997137
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Immunol. 1973 Oct;111(4):1112-8
pubmed: 4199556
Genet Mol Res. 2013 Dec 10;12(4):6414-23
pubmed: 24390990
Poult Sci. 1995 Oct;74(10):1622-9
pubmed: 8559726
Front Microbiol. 2014 Jun 17;5:282
pubmed: 24987390
Genes Nutr. 2011 Aug;6(3):261-74
pubmed: 21499799
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Jan;43(1):69-75
pubmed: 20632092
Poult Sci. 2017 Apr 1;96(4):966-975
pubmed: 28339522
Benef Microbes. 2013 Mar 1;4(1):101-7
pubmed: 23271068
Br Poult Sci. 2009 May;50(3):298-306
pubmed: 19637029
Microbiol Immunol. 2009 Nov;53(11):636-46
pubmed: 19903264
Annu Rev Immunol. 2018 Apr 26;36:359-381
pubmed: 29400985
Arch Tierernahr. 1990 Jul;40(7):543-67
pubmed: 2264760
Molecules. 2020 Jun 03;25(11):
pubmed: 32503356
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2016 Dec;100(6):1015-1022
pubmed: 27079815
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;17(5):725-40
pubmed: 14507584
Anim Nutr. 2018 Jun;4(2):170-178
pubmed: 30140756
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Aug 05;12(1):163
pubmed: 27496016
J Appl Microbiol. 2014 May;116(5):1308-14
pubmed: 24779583
Arch Pharm Res. 2010 Sep;33(9):1425-31
pubmed: 20945142
Br Poult Sci. 2012;53(1):106-15
pubmed: 22404811
Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 02;9(9):
pubmed: 31480791
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jul 05;10:149
pubmed: 24996258
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Aug;25(8):1159-68
pubmed: 25049676
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;49(5):506-515
pubmed: 30746776
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017 Jan;61(1):
pubmed: 27500859
Poult Sci. 2003 Jun;82(6):1030-6
pubmed: 12817461
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76(5):918-22
pubmed: 22738959
Anim Sci J. 2010 Apr;81(2):205-14
pubmed: 20438502
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020 Apr;70(4):2782-2858
pubmed: 32293557
Nutrients. 2013 Apr 22;5(4):1417-35
pubmed: 23609775
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 22;113(47):E7554-E7563
pubmed: 27821775
Nutrients. 2017 Sep 15;9(9):
pubmed: 28914794
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010 Feb;9(2):117-28
pubmed: 20081869
Br Poult Sci. 2012;53(4):497-507
pubmed: 23130585
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Oct;73(20):6566-76
pubmed: 17827305
Gut Pathog. 2014 Jun 14;6:23
pubmed: 24991236
Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Jul;29(1):2-14
pubmed: 20219683
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016 Jul;60(7):1637-48
pubmed: 27005687
J Nutr. 2010 Mar;140(3):671S-6S
pubmed: 20130080
Poult Sci. 2004 May;83(5):788-95
pubmed: 15141837
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):444S-450S
pubmed: 11157355
Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Jun;23(1):37-46
pubmed: 20403231
Vet Microbiol. 2006 May 31;114(3-4):173-86
pubmed: 16490324
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;11(11):1031-1045
pubmed: 28737484
Cell. 2014 Aug 28;158(5):1000-1010
pubmed: 25171403
J Food Sci. 2011 Jun-Jul;76(5):M260-7
pubmed: 22417436
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;10(12):741-5
pubmed: 24042452
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;10(10):
pubmed: 33066185
Int Immunopharmacol. 2013 Nov;17(3):670-6
pubmed: 24007779
Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Mar 11;27(3):319-321
pubmed: 32164843
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 20;20(19):
pubmed: 31547172
Res Vet Sci. 2012 Oct;93(2):721-8
pubmed: 22301016
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):564-8
pubmed: 9464394