Label-Free LC-MS/MS Analysis Reveals Different Proteomic Profiles between Egg Yolks of Silky Fowl and Ordinary Chickens.

egg yolk hemostasis label-free proteomic analysis neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction ovoinhibitor silky fowl (black-bone chicken) transthyretin

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 22 02 2022
revised: 26 03 2022
accepted: 28 03 2022
entrez: 12 4 2022
pubmed: 13 4 2022
medline: 13 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The proteomic profiles of Silky fowl egg yolk (SFEY) and Leghorn egg yolk (LEY) were analyzed by bottom-up label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). From a total of 186 identified proteins, 26 proteins were found significantly differentially abundant between two yolks, of which, 19 were up-regulated and 7 were down-regulated in SFEY, particularly, vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1, transthyretin and ovoinhibitor were up-regulated by 26, 25, and 16 times, respectively. In addition, there were 57 and 6 unique proteins in SFEY and LEY, respectively. Gene Ontology (GO) revealed SFEY contained relatively more abundant protease inhibitors and coagulation-related proteins. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed differentially abundant proteins in SFEY may be actively involved in the regulation of the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway. This study provides a theoretical basis for the understanding of proteomic and biological differences between these two yolks and can guide for further exploration of nutritional and biomedical use of Silky fowl egg.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35407122
pii: foods11071035
doi: 10.3390/foods11071035
pmc: PMC8997978
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : China Natural Science Foundation
ID : 31873006
Organisme : the Incubation Project of State Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Ecological Environment of Qinba Areas
ID : SLGPT2019KF04-04

Références

Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 09;11(3):
pubmed: 33803097
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015 Sep;309(5):R444-58
pubmed: 26084692
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Dec 16;9:738993
pubmed: 34976961
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jun;36(10):3420-35
pubmed: 18445632
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Jun;97(8):2392-2400
pubmed: 27664937
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;26(12):1367-72
pubmed: 19029910
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Jan 5;399:250-8
pubmed: 25458700
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(15):2508-2530
pubmed: 28609123
J Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;109(3):1245-56
pubmed: 2504730
J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 1;24(35):7707-17
pubmed: 15342738
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 21;11(4):
pubmed: 31010086
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Feb;62:120-132
pubmed: 27565683
Nat Methods. 2009 May;6(5):359-62
pubmed: 19377485
J Exp Biol. 2013 May 15;216(Pt 10):1949-58
pubmed: 23348941
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Jul 12;705(1):12-9
pubmed: 7115729
Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 1;66(3):1464-72
pubmed: 16452202
J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Mar 10;52(5):1328-30
pubmed: 14995141
Food Chem. 2022 Apr 16;374:131828
pubmed: 34915371
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 May 1;150:1093-1103
pubmed: 31743723
Biol Pharm Bull. 2003 Oct;26(10):1388-92
pubmed: 14519941
Genet Mol Res. 2014 Apr 29;13(2):3275-82
pubmed: 24841659
Poult Sci. 1997 Apr;76(4):649-53
pubmed: 9106895
Proteomics. 2008 Jan;8(1):178-91
pubmed: 18046696
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D109-14
pubmed: 22080510
J Alzheimers Dis. 2008 May;14(1):17-25
pubmed: 18525124
Prog Neurobiol. 2009 Nov;89(3):266-76
pubmed: 19665514
J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Dec 14;59(23):12368-74
pubmed: 22010862
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
pubmed: 10802651
J Proteome Res. 2014 Nov 7;13(11):5041-50
pubmed: 24884503
Mass Spectrom Rev. 2018 Nov;37(6):715-737
pubmed: 28758227
Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2019;49(3):215-221
pubmed: 30794044
Poult Sci. 2020 May;99(5):2775-2784
pubmed: 32359615
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 14;101(37):13417-22
pubmed: 15347803
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jun;99(8):3879-3885
pubmed: 30680735
Food Chem. 2021 Feb 15;338:127913
pubmed: 33092000
Nanotoxicology. 2016;10(5):575-85
pubmed: 26551753
J Biol Chem. 1981 Aug 25;256(16):8685-92
pubmed: 6167582
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 13;9:e10728
pubmed: 33520473
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Sep 1;110(3):617-627
pubmed: 31172172
Nutrients. 2015 Sep 24;7(10):8274-93
pubmed: 26404361
Thromb Haemost. 1999 Dec;82(6):1568-77
pubmed: 10613636
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Sep;13(9):2513-26
pubmed: 24942700
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D279-85
pubmed: 26673716
J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5 Suppl):801S-804S
pubmed: 9164240
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jan 7;50(D1):D543-D552
pubmed: 34723319
J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 1;22(15):6578-86
pubmed: 12151537
J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 24;270(12):6468-75
pubmed: 7534764
Br Poult Sci. 2003 Mar;44(1):145-8
pubmed: 12737237

Auteurs

Rao Wu (R)

Chinese-German Joint Laboratory for Natural Product Research, College of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China.

Chen Chen (C)

Chinese-German Joint Laboratory for Natural Product Research, College of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China.

Xiaoying Zhang (X)

Chinese-German Joint Laboratory for Natural Product Research, College of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China.
Centre of Molecular & Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Classifications MeSH