Nanodosimetric Calculations of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in a New Nucleus Geometrical Model Based on the Isochore Theory.
DNA damage simulation
Geant4-DNA
isochores
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2022
29 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
10
12
2021
revised:
23
03
2022
accepted:
28
03
2022
entrez:
12
4
2022
pubmed:
13
4
2022
medline:
14
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in nuclear DNA represents radiation-induced damage that has been identified as particularly deleterious. Calculating this damage using Monte Carlo track structure modeling could be a suitable indicator to better assess and anticipate the side-effects of radiation therapy. However, as already demonstrated in previous work, the geometrical description of the nucleus and the DNA content used in the simulation significantly influence damage calculations. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate results, this geometry must be as realistic as possible. In this study, a new geometrical model of an endothelial cell nucleus and DNA distribution according to the isochore theory are presented and used in a Monte Carlo simulation chain based on the Geant4-DNA toolkit. In this theory, heterochromatin and euchromatin compaction are distributed along the genome according to five different families (L1, L2, H1, H2, and H3). Each of these families is associated with a different hetero/euchromatin rate related to its compaction level. In order to compare the results with those obtained using a previous nuclear geometry, simulations were performed for protons with linear energy transfers (LETs) of 4.29 keV/µm, 19.51 keV/µm, and 43.25 keV/µm. The organization of the chromatin fibers at different compaction levels linked to isochore families increased the DSB yield by 6-10%, and it allowed the most affected part of the genome to be identified. These new results indicate that the genome core is more radiosensitive than the genome desert, with a 3-8% increase in damage depending on the LET. This work highlights the importance of using realistic distributions of chromatin compaction levels to calculate radio-induced damage using Monte Carlo simulation methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35409128
pii: ijms23073770
doi: 10.3390/ijms23073770
pmc: PMC8998209
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
Euchromatin
0
Isochores
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Mutat Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;704(1-3):78-87
pubmed: 20060491
Biophys J. 2004 May;86(5):2803-12
pubmed: 15111398
Chem Soc Rev. 2021 Aug 7;50(15):8355-8360
pubmed: 34128512
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2009 Nov;48(4):349-59
pubmed: 19597739
Gene. 2001 Oct 3;276(1-2):3-13
pubmed: 11591466
Mutat Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;704(1-3):88-100
pubmed: 20144732
Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jan;10(1):186-204
pubmed: 8450755
Mol Cell. 2007 Oct 12;28(1):1-13
pubmed: 17936700
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 May;27(5):1015-24
pubmed: 20018981
Genome Res. 2000 Dec;10(12):1986-95
pubmed: 11116093
Genome Res. 2006 Apr;16(4):536-41
pubmed: 16597586
Cancer Res. 2010 May 15;70(10):3925-34
pubmed: 20442295
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Dec 15;32(22):6565-74
pubmed: 15601999
Radiat Res. 2010 Mar;173(3):272-82
pubmed: 20199212
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jan 02;17(1):
pubmed: 26729112
Radiat Res. 2004 Jan;161(1):1-8
pubmed: 14680402
Radiat Res. 1975 Nov;64(2):306-20
pubmed: 1197641
Nat Genet. 2001 Mar;27(3):247-54
pubmed: 11242102
J Radiat Res. 1975 Sep;16(3):153-61
pubmed: 1195185
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Oct;4(10):809-14
pubmed: 14570061
Gene. 2004 May 26;333:135-41
pubmed: 15177688
Mutat Res. 2013 Aug 30;756(1-2):213-23
pubmed: 23811166
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 29901835
Chromosome Res. 2013 Dec;21(8):789-803
pubmed: 24323064
Mutat Res. 2011 Jun 3;711(1-2):41-8
pubmed: 21329707
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):861-874
pubmed: 26653251
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2315-7
pubmed: 16093569
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 May;22(5):1260-72
pubmed: 15728737
J Mol Evol. 2017 Mar;84(2-3):93-103
pubmed: 28243687
Int J Oncol. 2002 Aug;21(2):433-40
pubmed: 12118342
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 09;20(24):
pubmed: 31835321
Chemistry. 2006 Aug 7;12(23):6018-30
pubmed: 16791886
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):11923
pubmed: 28931851
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1501-1511
pubmed: 30689203
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4692-708
pubmed: 20964188
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Jan 19;280(2):567-73
pubmed: 11162557
Int J Part Ther. 2018 Summer;5(1):25-39
pubmed: 31773018
Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006
pubmed: 12045153
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jan;8(1):35-46
pubmed: 17173056
Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Feb;40(1):173-8
pubmed: 22260685
Phys Med. 2019 Jun;62:152-157
pubmed: 31109825
Phys Med. 2018 Apr;48:135-145
pubmed: 29628360
Radiat Res. 2003 Mar;159(3):401-10
pubmed: 12600243
Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 1;25(11):R462-5
pubmed: 26035790
Radiat Res. 1999 May;151(5):540-9
pubmed: 10319727