Assessing Smoke-Free Housing Implementation Approaches to Inform Best Practices: A National Survey of Early-Adopting Public Housing Authorities.
health disparities
policy implementation
secondhand smoke
smoke-free housing
socioeconomic disadvantage
tobacco control
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 03 2022
24 03 2022
Historique:
received:
16
02
2022
revised:
20
03
2022
accepted:
21
03
2022
entrez:
12
4
2022
pubmed:
13
4
2022
medline:
14
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure causes chronic illness and occurs at a higher prevalence in low-income communities than the general public. In 2018, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) instituted a smoke-free housing rule for Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) to address persistent health inequities. However, the success of smoke-free housing requires evidence to inform effective implementation approaches. A mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey was conducted in a national sample of PHAs. Questions focused on housing officials' use of specific implementation strategies. Adjusted odds ratios were used to assess associations between implementation approaches and variations among PHAs (i.e., region, size, or recency of policy adoption). Qualitative analyses were conducted to assess the perceived effectiveness of implementation strategies. Resident engagement, staff training, and smoking cessation support were the most frequently used implementation strategies. Engagement with local stakeholders was cited less frequently. Enforcement actions were limited with no violations referred to housing court. Support for policy adherence was identified as a sixth implementation strategy. While most PHAs used at least some evidence-informed implementation strategies, a lack of a systematic approach may limit overall effectiveness. Further research is required to resolve implementation barriers experienced disproportionately by a subset of PHAs, and to inform a best practice implementation framework that meets the needs of a heterogeneous population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35409538
pii: ijerph19073854
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073854
pmc: PMC8997519
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 20;15(10):
pubmed: 30241291
Health Place. 2019 Mar;56:106-117
pubmed: 30716667
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jan 21;31(1):133-138
pubmed: 33519163
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Oct 02;11:E171
pubmed: 25275808
Am J Health Promot. 2011 May-Jun;25(5 Suppl):S82-90
pubmed: 21510793
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
pubmed: 24289295
Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):189-94
pubmed: 12773730
Health Educ Res. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):234-246
pubmed: 30624678
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):9-20
pubmed: 25566811
Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar;102(3):490-3
pubmed: 21852657
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Jan;8(1):A21
pubmed: 21159233
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Dec 07;67(48):1342-1346
pubmed: 30521502
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):320-322
pubmed: 29246676
Science. 1987 Apr 10;236(4798):157-61
pubmed: 3563494
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Nov;12(11):1133-41
pubmed: 20889473
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Sep;14(9):1027-34
pubmed: 22318686
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 May;7(3):A66
pubmed: 20394705
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jun 21;15:E83
pubmed: 29935078
JAMA. 2016 Mar 15;315(11):1105-6
pubmed: 26882206
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2254-2256
pubmed: 32080738
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):107-117
pubmed: 29772910
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):1071
pubmed: 31395051
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Mar 22;15:E48
pubmed: 29565788
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;18(23):
pubmed: 34886292
Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1568-1575
pubmed: 31536405
Health Promot Pract. 2016 Nov;17(6):836-844
pubmed: 27402719
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E111
pubmed: 27536903