Characteristics of patients who received helicopter emergency medical services in Japan from 2012 to 2019: a retrospective analysis of data from Tochigi Prefecture.
Ambulance
Doctor-Heli
Helicopter emergency medical services
Pre-hospital intervention
Journal
Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
ISSN: 1757-7241
Titre abrégé: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101477511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Apr 2022
11 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
03
02
2022
accepted:
29
03
2022
entrez:
12
4
2022
pubmed:
13
4
2022
medline:
14
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has been in operation in Japan since 2001, allowing patients almost anywhere in the nation to receive on-scene emergency treatment from physicians. However, there is insufficient literature on the characteristics of the patients who use Japanese HEMS. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the overall characteristics of patients receiving HEMS care within a single prefecture in Japan. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 5163 patients-in Tochigi Prefecture-who received HEMS care from 2012 to 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the following aspects of care: diagnosis, severity, background characteristics, geographical and environmental variables, immediate pre-hospital intervention, transportation type, and short-term clinical outcomes. Among 7370 HEMS requests received during the study period, treatment was provided to 5163 patients (1.8 cases per day; 3489 men [67.6%]). Nearly 55% (n = 2856) of patients were aged above 60 years. Age peaks were observed at 0-9 years and 60-69 years. The median distance from the base hospital to the site was 26.7 km. The age-standardized rate of HEMS treatment was 30.3 patients per 100,000 people. Cases of trauma and cardiovascular diseases were the most common (65.3%). Most individuals aged 0-9 years and 60-69 years had neurological disease (seizures accounted for 80.5% of this group) and cardiovascular disease, respectively. The number of patients was similar across all four seasons. After immediate pre-hospital intervention, 81.6% of patients receiving HEMS care were transferred by the helicopter ambulance (53.4% and 28.2% to the base hospital and to other hospitals, respectively). Overall, 56.6% of patients receiving HEMS care were transferred to the base hospital, and the short-term recovery rate was above 75%. Intravenous drip and oxygen administration were the most common pre-hospital interventions (93.1% and 72.7%, respectively). This study is the first to describe the overall characteristics of HEMS patients using comprehensive data of all HEMS patients in one prefecture in Japan. Further research using both local- and national-level data is needed to accelerate the understanding of the benefits of HEMS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has been in operation in Japan since 2001, allowing patients almost anywhere in the nation to receive on-scene emergency treatment from physicians. However, there is insufficient literature on the characteristics of the patients who use Japanese HEMS. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the overall characteristics of patients receiving HEMS care within a single prefecture in Japan.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 5163 patients-in Tochigi Prefecture-who received HEMS care from 2012 to 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the following aspects of care: diagnosis, severity, background characteristics, geographical and environmental variables, immediate pre-hospital intervention, transportation type, and short-term clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 7370 HEMS requests received during the study period, treatment was provided to 5163 patients (1.8 cases per day; 3489 men [67.6%]). Nearly 55% (n = 2856) of patients were aged above 60 years. Age peaks were observed at 0-9 years and 60-69 years. The median distance from the base hospital to the site was 26.7 km. The age-standardized rate of HEMS treatment was 30.3 patients per 100,000 people. Cases of trauma and cardiovascular diseases were the most common (65.3%). Most individuals aged 0-9 years and 60-69 years had neurological disease (seizures accounted for 80.5% of this group) and cardiovascular disease, respectively. The number of patients was similar across all four seasons. After immediate pre-hospital intervention, 81.6% of patients receiving HEMS care were transferred by the helicopter ambulance (53.4% and 28.2% to the base hospital and to other hospitals, respectively). Overall, 56.6% of patients receiving HEMS care were transferred to the base hospital, and the short-term recovery rate was above 75%. Intravenous drip and oxygen administration were the most common pre-hospital interventions (93.1% and 72.7%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first to describe the overall characteristics of HEMS patients using comprehensive data of all HEMS patients in one prefecture in Japan. Further research using both local- and national-level data is needed to accelerate the understanding of the benefits of HEMS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35410427
doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01012-6
pii: 10.1186/s13049-022-01012-6
pmc: PMC8996593
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;27(1):102
pubmed: 31699120
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):
pubmed: 33053616
Air Med J. 2021 Nov-Dec;40(6):399-403
pubmed: 34794778
Crit Care. 2013 Jul 16;17(4):169
pubmed: 23890322
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 20;22(1):6
pubmed: 29351759
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 29;28(1):46
pubmed: 32471467
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;16(9):
pubmed: 31052200
Air Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;30(6):328-32
pubmed: 22055177
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):295-302
pubmed: 21524205
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 21;25(1):97
pubmed: 28934985
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):946-9
pubmed: 26430435
Air Med J. 2019 Mar - Apr;38(2):115-124
pubmed: 30898282
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):87
pubmed: 34294031
Air Med J. 2019 Mar - Apr;38(2):73-77
pubmed: 30898287
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):28
pubmed: 30157756
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2021;255(1):79-89
pubmed: 34588376
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):237-42
pubmed: 16490658
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Apr;84(4):549-557
pubmed: 29251708
JAMA. 1986 Aug 22-29;256(8):1027-31
pubmed: 3525878
Air Med J. 2019 Nov - Dec;38(6):437-439
pubmed: 31843156
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Sep;28(9):2525-2529
pubmed: 31256983
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 May;64(5):691-704
pubmed: 31950487
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;44(5):439-50
pubmed: 15520702
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 29;24(1):140
pubmed: 27899124
Intern Med. 2006;45(2):45-50
pubmed: 16484738
Emerg Med J. 2010 Sep;27(9):692-701
pubmed: 20679422
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1208-16
pubmed: 22092906
Crit Care. 2014 Jul 09;18(4):R146
pubmed: 25008159