Development of the Socioeconomic Screening, Active Engagement, Follow-up, Education, Discharge Readiness, and Consistency (SAFEDC) Model for Improving Transitions of Care: Participatory Design.
care transition
design
discharge
participatory design
patient-centered care
readmission
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Apr 2022
12 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
15
06
2021
accepted:
07
02
2022
revised:
08
01
2022
entrez:
12
4
2022
pubmed:
13
4
2022
medline:
13
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Transition to home after hospitalization involves the potential risk of adverse patient events, such as knowledge deficits related to self-care, medication errors, and readmissions. Despite broad organizational efforts to provide better care transitions for patients, there are challenges in implementing interventions that effectively improve care transition outcomes, as evidenced by readmission rates. Collaborative efforts that require health care professionals, patients, and caregivers to work together are necessary to identify gaps associated with transitions of care and generate effective transitional care interventions. This study aims to understand the usefulness of participatory design approaches in identifying the design implications of transition of care interventions in health care settings. Through a series of participatory design workshops, we have brought stakeholders of the health care system together. With a shared understanding of care transition and patient experience, we have provided participants with opportunities to generate possible design implications for care transitions. We selected field observations in clinical settings and participatory design workshops to develop transitional care interventions that serve each hospital's unique situation and context. Patient journey maps were created and functioned as tools for creating a shared understanding of the discharge process across different stakeholders in the health care environment. The intervention sustainability was also assessed. By applying thematic analysis methods, we analyzed the problem statements and proposed interventions collected from participatory design workshops. The findings showed patterns of major discussion during the workshop. On the basis of the workshop results, we formalized the transition of care model-the socioeconomic, active engagement, follow-up, education, discharge readiness tool, and consistency (Integrated Michigan Patient-centered Alliance in Care Transitions transition of care model)-which other organizations can apply to improve patient experiences in care transition. This model highlights the most significant themes that should necessarily be considered to improve the transition of care. Our study presents the benefits of the participatory design approach in defining the challenges associated with transitions of care related to patient discharge and generating sustainable interventions to improve care transitions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Transition to home after hospitalization involves the potential risk of adverse patient events, such as knowledge deficits related to self-care, medication errors, and readmissions. Despite broad organizational efforts to provide better care transitions for patients, there are challenges in implementing interventions that effectively improve care transition outcomes, as evidenced by readmission rates. Collaborative efforts that require health care professionals, patients, and caregivers to work together are necessary to identify gaps associated with transitions of care and generate effective transitional care interventions.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to understand the usefulness of participatory design approaches in identifying the design implications of transition of care interventions in health care settings. Through a series of participatory design workshops, we have brought stakeholders of the health care system together. With a shared understanding of care transition and patient experience, we have provided participants with opportunities to generate possible design implications for care transitions.
METHODS
METHODS
We selected field observations in clinical settings and participatory design workshops to develop transitional care interventions that serve each hospital's unique situation and context. Patient journey maps were created and functioned as tools for creating a shared understanding of the discharge process across different stakeholders in the health care environment. The intervention sustainability was also assessed. By applying thematic analysis methods, we analyzed the problem statements and proposed interventions collected from participatory design workshops. The findings showed patterns of major discussion during the workshop.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On the basis of the workshop results, we formalized the transition of care model-the socioeconomic, active engagement, follow-up, education, discharge readiness tool, and consistency (Integrated Michigan Patient-centered Alliance in Care Transitions transition of care model)-which other organizations can apply to improve patient experiences in care transition. This model highlights the most significant themes that should necessarily be considered to improve the transition of care.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study presents the benefits of the participatory design approach in defining the challenges associated with transitions of care related to patient discharge and generating sustainable interventions to improve care transitions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35412461
pii: v6i4e31277
doi: 10.2196/31277
pmc: PMC9044161
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e31277Informations de copyright
©Ji Youn Shin, Nkiru Okammor, Karly Hendee, Amber Pawlikowski, Grace Jenq, David Bozaan. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 12.04.2022.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jun 3;160(11):774-84
pubmed: 24862840
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:406
pubmed: 25234932
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 24;71(16):1768-1777
pubmed: 29673467
Circulation. 2016 May 31;133(22):2197-205
pubmed: 27245648
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;3(1):44-53
pubmed: 29128869
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Mar;8(2):384-409
pubmed: 25604605
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Oct;221(4):810-20
pubmed: 26228011
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182777
pubmed: 30646181
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Jul;2(2):136-44
pubmed: 26250382
JAMA. 2011 Oct 19;306(15):1688-98
pubmed: 22009101
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Apr 24;160(8):1074-81
pubmed: 10789599
BMJ. 2010 Aug 13;341:c4078
pubmed: 20709715
Circulation. 2015 May 19;131(20):1796-803
pubmed: 25986448
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 15;122(6):415-21
pubmed: 7856989
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):533-6
pubmed: 15466770
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1822-8
pubmed: 17000937
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e16-e25
pubmed: 29788319
Clin Nurs Res. 2013 Aug;22(3):258-74
pubmed: 23113935
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Oct;22(5):629-33
pubmed: 22037593
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003;22(3):1-17
pubmed: 14629081