Risk for Persistent Peripheral Neuropathy After Repair of Brachial Artery Injuries.
brachial
brachial artery transection
motor neuropathy
orthopaedic hand surgery
sensitive neuropathy
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
accepted:
09
03
2022
entrez:
13
4
2022
pubmed:
14
4
2022
medline:
14
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Brachial artery lacerations are limb-threatening injuries requiring emergent repair. Concomitant peripheral nerve symptoms are often only identified postoperatively. This study evaluated the prevalence of peripheral nerve deficits among this population as the indications for early nerve exploration have not been definitively established. Methods We reviewed all patients sustaining a brachial artery injury at one pediatric and two adult Level I Trauma Centers between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. We recorded patient demographics, comorbidities, intoxication status, injury mechanism, concomitant injuries, type of repair, and intraoperative peripheral nerve exploration findings. Pre-and post-operative and long-term peripheral nerve function examination findings were analyzed. Differences between categorical variables were determined with Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results Thirty-four patients sustained traumatic brachial artery lacerations requiring operative repair. Injury mechanisms included tidy (clean cut) laceration (n=11, 32%), gunshot wound (n=9, 26%), blunt trauma (n=8, 24%), and untidy laceration (n=6, 18%). Preoperatively, 15% had a normal peripheral nerve examination, 26% had localizable symptoms, 38% had non-localizable symptoms, and 21% were taken to the operating room without formal nerve assessment. Thirty-two percent underwent formal nerve exploration, and 81% underwent nerve repair. At an average follow-up of 2.5 years, 27% of patients underwent exploration, and 39% did not have localizable peripheral nerve deficits (
Identifiants
pubmed: 35415029
doi: 10.7759/cureus.22997
pmc: PMC8992875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e22997Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Loewenstein et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Jun;15(2):120-7
pubmed: 20626775
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):8-16
pubmed: 18640813
Am Surg. 1997 Mar;63(3):224-7
pubmed: 9036888
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Nov;Suppl:S81-6
pubmed: 15643364
Am J Surg. 1988 Aug;156(2):115-8
pubmed: 3400808
Injury. 1997 Sep;28(7):463-8
pubmed: 9509088
Am J Surg. 2004 Sep;188(3):240-5
pubmed: 15450827
Orthopedics. 2012 Mar 07;35(3):e349-52
pubmed: 22385445
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Jul;83(5):646-9
pubmed: 11476297
Injury. 1995 Oct;26(8):515-8
pubmed: 8550137
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Feb;34(2):281-7
pubmed: 19181228
Malays Orthop J. 2014 Mar;8(1):14-20
pubmed: 25279079
J Trauma. 1970 May;10(5):359-69
pubmed: 4909463
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):484-94; discussion 495-6
pubmed: 16079678
Am J Surg. 1980 Nov;140(5):596-9
pubmed: 7435813
J Physiol. 1981;313:513-28
pubmed: 7277234
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 10;26(1):76
pubmed: 30201025
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jan;73(1):154-7
pubmed: 1991753