Early Experience Using Donor-derived Cell-free DNA for Surveillance of Rejection Following Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation.


Journal

Transplantation direct
ISSN: 2373-8731
Titre abrégé: Transplant Direct
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101651609

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 15 02 2022
accepted: 05 03 2022
entrez: 13 4 2022
pubmed: 14 4 2022
medline: 14 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Allograft biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing graft rejection following simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant. Intraperitoneal biopsies are technically challenging and can be burdensome to patients and the healthcare system. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is well-studied in kidney transplant recipients; however, it has not yet been studied in the SPK population. We hypothesized that dd-cfDNA could be utilized for rejection surveillance following SPK transplant. We prospectively collected dd-cfDNA in 46 SPK patients at a single institution. There were 10 rejection events, 5 of which were confirmed with biopsy. The other 5 were treated based on dd-cfDNA and clinical data alone with favorable outcomes. Among all patients who did not have rejection, 97% had dd-cfDNA <0.5%. Dd-cfDNA may also help differentiate rejection from graft injury (ie, pancreatitis) with median values in rejection 2.25%, injury 0.36%, and quiescence 0.18% ( Similar to kidneys, dd-cfDNA shows promise for rejection surveillance in SPK transplant recipients.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Allograft biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing graft rejection following simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant. Intraperitoneal biopsies are technically challenging and can be burdensome to patients and the healthcare system. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is well-studied in kidney transplant recipients; however, it has not yet been studied in the SPK population.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We hypothesized that dd-cfDNA could be utilized for rejection surveillance following SPK transplant. We prospectively collected dd-cfDNA in 46 SPK patients at a single institution.
Results UNASSIGNED
There were 10 rejection events, 5 of which were confirmed with biopsy. The other 5 were treated based on dd-cfDNA and clinical data alone with favorable outcomes. Among all patients who did not have rejection, 97% had dd-cfDNA <0.5%. Dd-cfDNA may also help differentiate rejection from graft injury (ie, pancreatitis) with median values in rejection 2.25%, injury 0.36%, and quiescence 0.18% (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Similar to kidneys, dd-cfDNA shows promise for rejection surveillance in SPK transplant recipients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35415217
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001321
pmc: PMC8989777
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e1321

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

M.F. is employed by CareDx Inc. Oyedolamu Olaitan was a consultant and received honoraria from CareDx Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

Kidney360. 2020 Jun 19;1(10):1118-1123
pubmed: 35368782
J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Nov 1;2(3):309-321
pubmed: 33636851
Curr Transplant Rep. 2015;2(2):169-175
pubmed: 26000231
Transplantation. 2021 Mar 1;105(3):509-516
pubmed: 32732615
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 23;8(1):
pubmed: 30583588
Transplant Proc. 2022 Jan-Feb;54(1):176-179
pubmed: 34961600
Am J Transplant. 2020 Sep;20(9):2491-2498
pubmed: 32056331
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jul;28(7):2221-2232
pubmed: 28280140
Am J Transplant. 2018 May;18(5):1256-1261
pubmed: 29316221
Am J Transplant. 2005 Aug;5(8):1992-6
pubmed: 15996250
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1663-1670
pubmed: 30725531
Transplant Direct. 2018 Aug 20;4(9):e379
pubmed: 30234148
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Apr 1;35(4):714-721
pubmed: 31106364

Auteurs

Michael D Williams (MD)

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Mingwei Fei (M)

CareDX, Inc., Brisbane, CA.

Erik Schadde (E)

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Edward F Hollinger (EF)

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Edie Y Chan (EY)

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Oyedolamu Olaitan (O)

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Classifications MeSH