Real-world analysis of main clinical outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib or best available therapy after developing resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea.
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Hydroxyurea
/ adverse effects
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
/ drug therapy
Neoplasms, Second Primary
/ drug therapy
Nitriles
Polycythemia Vera
/ drug therapy
Primary Myelofibrosis
/ drug therapy
Pyrazoles
Pyrimidines
Retrospective Studies
Thrombosis
/ chemically induced
hemorrhage
myelofibrosis
myeloproliferative neoplasms
polycythemia vera
ruxolitinib
therapy
thrombosis
Journal
Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2022
01 07 2022
Historique:
revised:
21
01
2022
received:
29
10
2021
accepted:
14
02
2022
pubmed:
14
4
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
entrez:
13
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease-progression is unknown. A retrospective, real-world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT. Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups. The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis. Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression. We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272). Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease-modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease-progression is unknown.
METHODS
A retrospective, real-world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT.
RESULTS
Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis.
LAY SUMMARY
Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression. We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272). Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease-modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35417564
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34195
pmc: PMC9324831
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nitriles
0
Pyrazoles
0
Pyrimidines
0
ruxolitinib
82S8X8XX8H
Hydroxyurea
X6Q56QN5QC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2441-2448Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Références
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Mar;7(3):e226-e237
pubmed: 31982039
Blood. 2012 Feb 9;119(6):1363-9
pubmed: 22160617
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 Oct;20(10):697-703.e1
pubmed: 32624445
Am J Hematol. 2012 Nov;87(11):1003-5
pubmed: 22965887
Leukemia. 2019 Jun;33(6):1522-1526
pubmed: 30635625
Ann Hematol. 2021 Nov;100(11):2707-2716
pubmed: 34462786
Ann Hematol. 2018 Mar;97(3):443-451
pubmed: 29181548
Leuk Res. 2021 Oct;109:106629
pubmed: 34082375
Br J Haematol. 2016 Mar;172(5):786-93
pubmed: 26898196
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1117-27
pubmed: 20843246
J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Feb 22;10(1):54
pubmed: 28228104
Ann Hematol. 2019 Jun;98(6):1421-1426
pubmed: 30919072
Br J Haematol. 2010 Mar;148(6):961-3
pubmed: 19930182
Haematologica. 2017 Jan;102(1):103-109
pubmed: 27686377
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):426-35
pubmed: 25629741
Haematologica. 2011 Feb;96(2):315-8
pubmed: 21173097
Leukemia. 2021 Sep;35(9):2592-2601
pubmed: 33654206
Ann Hematol. 2018 Sep;97(9):1591-1600
pubmed: 29804268
Microvasc Res. 2020 Nov;132:104060
pubmed: 32818511
Ann Hematol. 2017 Jul;96(7):1113-1120
pubmed: 28456851
Leukemia. 2019 Aug;33(8):1996-2005
pubmed: 31142846
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;142(9):2041-9
pubmed: 27431664
Cancer. 2022 Jul 1;128(13):2441-2448
pubmed: 35417564
Exp Hematol. 2014 May;42(5):360-8
pubmed: 24463275
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405
pubmed: 27069254
Platelets. 2022 Apr 3;33(3):404-415
pubmed: 34097573
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2224-32
pubmed: 15710945
Leukemia. 2021 Feb;35(2):623-627
pubmed: 32372025
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2016 Sep;27(6):648-52
pubmed: 26569516
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Mar;7(3):e196-e208
pubmed: 32014125
Haematologica. 2019 Dec;104(12):2391-2399
pubmed: 31123026
Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):380-386
pubmed: 31985808