What are the Bad Habits and Behaviors of Inconsiderate Doctors in Chinese Inhabitants' Mind? A Cross-Sectional Study.

Chinese doctors doctor–patient relationship inconsiderate behaviors inhabitants’ perspective

Journal

Risk management and healthcare policy
ISSN: 1179-1594
Titre abrégé: Risk Manag Healthc Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566264

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 24 01 2022
accepted: 18 03 2022
entrez: 14 4 2022
pubmed: 15 4 2022
medline: 15 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aims to 1) investigate inhabitants' perceptions of doctors' inconsiderate behaviors during diagnosis and treatment, 2) explore the factors influencing inhabitants' attitudes toward doctors' professional reputation, and 3) examine the status of doctors' inconsiderate behaviors and inhabitants' attitudes and behaviors toward these doctors in China. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 2050 participants from over 30 Chinese cities, from March to June 2018. In total, 1598 valid questionnaires were obtained (with an effective response rate of 77.95%). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, and logistic linear regression analysis. We developed a questionnaire comprising of 15 items regarding doctors' inconsiderate behaviors based on inhabitants' perspectives (Cronbach's alpha was 0.944). Additionally, we identified the factors that influence the attitudes of inhabitants regarding doctors' professional reputation, such as frequency of medical consultations, medical expenses, education catalog, and type of medical insurance. A majority of the participants highly valued Chinese doctors' professional reputation (87.55%), and trusted them (86.29%). However, about 60.27% of the participants reported a pessimistic-like judgment on the current doctor-patient relationship (DPR) in China. Participants believed that Chinese doctors received a high income (20.47%), maintained a high social status (23.46%), and had a heavy workload (59.95%). Furthermore, about 54.88% of participants reported that they would not engage in aggressive behaviors against doctors during a dispute. Lastly, about 26.66% of participants reported that they would act rationally when they were dissatisfied with their doctors. Impassive emotions and improper actions of doctors toward patients jointly contributed to the disrepute of Chinese doctors. Although DPR was becoming tense, Chinese inhabitants held a positive evaluation of doctors' professional reputation. While an improvement in the economic situation and reputation of doctors enhanced the DPR, there remains an urgent need to improve the working environment in regard to future Chinese health reforms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35418788
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S358680
pii: 358680
pmc: PMC8996385
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

583-595

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Wang et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):755
pubmed: 27560268
Med Law. 2011 Sep;30(3):401-15
pubmed: 22191328
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 7;7(12):e017182
pubmed: 29222134
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):21-34
pubmed: 16427760
BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):667-8
pubmed: 12351341
Iran J Public Health. 2018 May;47(5):698-705
pubmed: 29922612
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Mar 20;31(1):110-124
pubmed: 28260407
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1192-1204
pubmed: 31571602
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2013;46(4):417-27
pubmed: 24922991
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1617
pubmed: 27116071
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 3;16(1):42
pubmed: 28253876
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 25;20(1):e35
pubmed: 29371176
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 16;13:1125-1143
pubmed: 31409976
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):477-88
pubmed: 16977644
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;100(3):594-9
pubmed: 12220784
Lancet. 2020 Jan 11;395(10218):90
pubmed: 31929017
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):193
pubmed: 32164684
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55
pubmed: 28029643
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 3;8(10):e019373
pubmed: 30287664
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022455
pubmed: 30121612
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Oct;11(4):359-78
pubmed: 27018911
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 03;15:523-532
pubmed: 33692616
Med Care. 2009 Aug;47(8):826-34
pubmed: 19584762
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(5):657-68
pubmed: 10975226
Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1013
pubmed: 24656183
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Jul;32(3):254-263
pubmed: 28589685

Auteurs

Hong-Ni Wang (HN)

Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Jing-Hui Wang (JH)

School of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.

Xin Zhao (X)

Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Xiao-He Wang (XH)

Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Meng Zhang (M)

Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Yu Shi (Y)

Department of Health Management, School of Vanke Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Shu-E Zhang (SE)

School of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.

Tao Sun (T)

Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Bei Liu (B)

School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Classifications MeSH