The Relative Importance of Vascular Risk Factors on Early Cognitive Aging Varies Only Slightly Between Men and Women.

bias cardiovascular risk factors cognitive aging sex susceptibility

Journal

Frontiers in aging neuroscience
ISSN: 1663-4365
Titre abrégé: Front Aging Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101525824

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 29 10 2021
accepted: 16 02 2022
entrez: 14 4 2022
pubmed: 15 4 2022
medline: 15 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To investigate the sex-specific course and impact of vascular risk factors on cognitive aging in a rather young and healthy community-dwelling cohort. We used data from a population-based cohort study, collected three times during 6 years, comprising 1,911 examinations from 798 participants aged 35-66 years at baseline. Cognitive performance on the Color-Word-Interference-Test, the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A&B, the Word Fluency Test, a 12-item word list, the Purdue Pegboard Test and a principal component global score were used as outcomes in linear mixed models. We evaluated (1) sex differences in cognitive trajectories, (2) the mediating role of hypertension, diabetes, smoking and obesity [body mass index (BMI) > 30] on sex differences and (3) in sex-stratified analyses, potential sex-specific effects of these risk factors on cognition. For all cognitive tests, we observed cognitive decline with age. Rates of decline slightly differed across sexes, showing a later but steeper decline for women in tests of memory (word list) and word fluency, but a steeper decline for men in tests of psychomotor speed and mental set shifting (TMT A&B) in older age. Women generally scored better on cognitive tests, but the slightly higher prevalence of classical vascular risks factors in men in our cohort could not explain these sex differences. Sex-stratified analyses revealed a generally small, concordantly negative, but quantitatively slightly different impact of diabetes, smoking and obesity on cognitive functions but mixed effects for arterial hypertension, depending on the blood pressure values, the treatment status and the duration of arterial hypertension. Cognitive sex differences in this rather young and healthy cohort could not be explained by a differing prevalence of vascular risks factors across sexes. The association of cardiovascular risk factors with cognition, however, slightly differed between men and women, whereby effects were generally small. Whereas longtime diabetes, obesity and smoking had a sex-specific, but concordantly negative impact on psychomotor speed, executive and motor functions, we found some opposing effects for arterial hypertension. Our results can help to identify sex-specific susceptibilities to modifiable risk factors, to attract attention to potential information bias and to stimulate further research into alternative causes and mechanism of sex differences in cognitive aging.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35418850
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.804842
pmc: PMC8996124
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

804842

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Bonberg, Wulms, Berger and Minnerup.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 14;5:1556
pubmed: 25642200
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):231-238
pubmed: 27059857
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):201-12
pubmed: 19585955
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;18(4):373-383
pubmed: 28179809
Am Heart J. 2006 Sep;152(3):593-8
pubmed: 16923436
Psychol Aging. 2019 Feb;34(1):17-24
pubmed: 30211596
J Neuroinflammation. 2018 Jan 16;15(1):17
pubmed: 29338747
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 06;11:564
pubmed: 32435193
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):464-9
pubmed: 16053959
Neuropsychology. 2018 May;32(4):461-475
pubmed: 29517259
J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1-2):24-39
pubmed: 27870427
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Jun;22(3):278-95
pubmed: 21220355
Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2672-713
pubmed: 21778438
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):211-8
pubmed: 25670232
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 13;14:174
pubmed: 24924233
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013154
pubmed: 31549581
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15605
pubmed: 31083252
Brain Cogn. 2000 Dec;44(3):445-54
pubmed: 11104536
Neurology. 1989 Sep;39(9):1159-65
pubmed: 2771064
J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):234-47
pubmed: 18867059
Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:147-83
pubmed: 17015079
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;11(4):
pubmed: 33924660
J Appl Psychol. 1990 Feb;75(1):87-90
pubmed: 2307635
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;14(10):591-604
pubmed: 30022099
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;25(8):889-899
pubmed: 28433548
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Oct 30;12:578742
pubmed: 33192471
Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):62-79
pubmed: 16443719
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1246-1254
pubmed: 28783817
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446
pubmed: 32738937
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(4):1643-1655
pubmed: 33720886
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110513
pubmed: 34022671
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 22;9(1):
pubmed: 31877865
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Feb;7(2):184-90
pubmed: 18207116
Circ Res. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):1025-1044
pubmed: 30920929
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Jan;52B(1):P28-39
pubmed: 9008673
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Feb;14(2):167-77
pubmed: 14590600
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;66(7):785-95
pubmed: 19581570
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Dec;38(6):401-8
pubmed: 24933107
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):e106-e115
pubmed: 33516287
Psychol Med. 2018 Jun;48(8):1381-1389
pubmed: 29108529
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210169
pubmed: 33630089
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 19;191(3):441-452
pubmed: 34521111
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Oct;20(10):1496-1503
pubmed: 30238630
Am Heart J. 1986 Feb;111(2):383-90
pubmed: 3946178
Neurology. 2019 Mar 12;92(11):e1256-e1267
pubmed: 30760633
Psychol Aging. 2016 Mar;31(2):166-75
pubmed: 26796792
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Oct 15;97:9-16
pubmed: 28688836
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 1;196:152-160
pubmed: 30980900
Neurology. 2011 Aug 2;77(5):461-8
pubmed: 21810696

Auteurs

Nadine Bonberg (N)

Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Niklas Wulms (N)

Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Klaus Berger (K)

Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Heike Minnerup (H)

Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Classifications MeSH