Risk of Early Versus Later Rebleeding From Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With Cortical Venous Drainage.
drainage
fistula
hemorrhage
incidence
natural history
Journal
Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
15
4
2022
medline:
30
6
2022
entrez:
14
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage are rare lesions that can present with hemorrhage. A high rate of rebleeding in the early period following hemorrhage has been reported, but published long-term rates are much lower. No study has examined how risk of rebleeding changes over time. Our objective was to quantify the relative incidence of rebleeding in the early and later periods following hemorrhage. Patients with dural arteriovenous fistula and cortical venous drainage presenting with hemorrhage were identified from the multinational CONDOR (Consortium for Dural Fistula Outcomes Research) database. Natural history follow-up was defined as time from hemorrhage to first treatment, rebleed, or last follow-up. Rebleeding in the first 2 weeks and first year were compared using incidence rate ratio and difference. Of 1077 patients, 250 met the inclusion criteria and had 95 cumulative person-years natural history follow-up. The overall annualized rebleed rate was 7.3% (95% CI, 3.2-14.5). The incidence rate of rebleeding in the first 2 weeks was 0.0011 per person-day; an early rebleed risk of 1.6% in the first 14 days (95% CI, 0.3-5.1). For the remainder of the first year, the incidence rate was 0.00015 per person-day; a rebleed rate of 5.3% (CI, 1.7-12.4) over 1 year. The incidence rate ratio was 7.3 (95% CI, 1.4-37.7; The risk of rebleeding of a dural arteriovenous fistula with cortical venous drainage presenting with hemorrhage is increased in the first 2 weeks justifying early treatment. However, the magnitude of this increase may be considerably lower than previously thought. Treatment within 5 days was associated with a low rate of rebleeding and appears an appropriate timeframe.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage are rare lesions that can present with hemorrhage. A high rate of rebleeding in the early period following hemorrhage has been reported, but published long-term rates are much lower. No study has examined how risk of rebleeding changes over time. Our objective was to quantify the relative incidence of rebleeding in the early and later periods following hemorrhage.
METHODS
Patients with dural arteriovenous fistula and cortical venous drainage presenting with hemorrhage were identified from the multinational CONDOR (Consortium for Dural Fistula Outcomes Research) database. Natural history follow-up was defined as time from hemorrhage to first treatment, rebleed, or last follow-up. Rebleeding in the first 2 weeks and first year were compared using incidence rate ratio and difference.
RESULTS
Of 1077 patients, 250 met the inclusion criteria and had 95 cumulative person-years natural history follow-up. The overall annualized rebleed rate was 7.3% (95% CI, 3.2-14.5). The incidence rate of rebleeding in the first 2 weeks was 0.0011 per person-day; an early rebleed risk of 1.6% in the first 14 days (95% CI, 0.3-5.1). For the remainder of the first year, the incidence rate was 0.00015 per person-day; a rebleed rate of 5.3% (CI, 1.7-12.4) over 1 year. The incidence rate ratio was 7.3 (95% CI, 1.4-37.7;
CONCLUSIONS
The risk of rebleeding of a dural arteriovenous fistula with cortical venous drainage presenting with hemorrhage is increased in the first 2 weeks justifying early treatment. However, the magnitude of this increase may be considerably lower than previously thought. Treatment within 5 days was associated with a low rate of rebleeding and appears an appropriate timeframe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35420453
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036450
pmc: PMC9232241
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2340-2345Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00030/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS111119
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002736
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR002737
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Jay F Piccirillo
(JF)
Hari Raman
(H)
Kim Lipsey
(K)
Roanna Vine
(R)
Harry J Cloft
(HJ)
David F Kallmes
(DF)
Bruce E Pollock
(BE)
Michael J Link
(MJ)
Mohana Rao Patibandla
(MR)
Dale Ding
(D)
Thomas Buell
(T)
Gabriella Paisan
(G)
R Michael Meyer
(RM)
Cory Kelly
(C)
Jonathan Duffill
(J)
Adam Ditchfield
(A)
Jason Macdonald
(J)
Dimitri Laurent
(D)
Brian Hoh
(B)
Jessica Smith
(J)
Ashley Lockerman
(A)
L Dade Lunsford
(LD)
Brian T Jankowitz
(BT)
Santiago Ortega Gutierrez
(SO)
David Hasan
(D)
Jorge A Roa
(JA)
James Rossen
(J)
Waldo Guerrero
(W)
Allen McGruder
(A)
Fady T Charbel
(FT)
Victor A Aletich
(VA)
Linda Rose-Finnell
(L)
Eric C Peterson
(EC)
Dileep R Yavagal
(DR)
Samir Sur
(S)
Yasuhisa Kanematsu
(Y)
Nobuaki Yamamoto
(N)
Tomoya Kinouchi
(T)
Masaaki Korai
(M)
Izumi Yamaguchi
(I)
Yuki Yamamoto
(Y)
Ethan Winkler
(E)
Michael Lawton
(M)
Martin Rutkowski
(M)
M Ali Aziz Sultan
(MAA)
Nirav Patel
(N)
Kai U Frerichs
(KU)
Références
J Neurosurg. 2021 Sep 10;136(4):951-961
pubmed: 34507282
Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1735-9
pubmed: 18388337
Stroke. 2002 Jun;33(6):1578-83
pubmed: 12052994
J Neurosurg. 2002 Oct;97(4):767-70
pubmed: 12405361
J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 1;129(5):1114-1119
pubmed: 29243979
Stroke. 2003 May;34(5):1156-62
pubmed: 12702840
J Neurosurg. 1995 Apr;82(4):705-6
pubmed: 7897546
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 May;34(5):E15
pubmed: 23634919
Radiology. 1995 Mar;194(3):671-80
pubmed: 7862961
Neurosurgery. 2009 Aug;65(2):287-92; discussion 292-3
pubmed: 19625907
J Neurosurg. 2002 Oct;97(4):771-8
pubmed: 12405362
Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(3):594-602; discussion 602-3
pubmed: 22610384
J Neurol. 2015 Dec;262(12):2678-83
pubmed: 26410748
J Neurosurg. 1999 Jan;90(1):78-84
pubmed: 10413159
Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2):241-7; discussion 247-8
pubmed: 19190453
Neurosurgery. 2012 Feb;70(2):312-8; discussion 318-9
pubmed: 21822156