Food security status of patients with type 2 diabetes and their adherence to dietary counselling from selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
27
07
2020
accepted:
03
03
2022
entrez:
14
4
2022
pubmed:
15
4
2022
medline:
19
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even though adherence to dietary counselling for patients with diabetes is essential for improving health and preventing complications, access to an adequate and quality diet is challenging for patients living in a food-insecure household. The availability of data in this regard is limited in Ethiopia. Thus, this study assessed the food security status of patients with type 2 diabetes, their adherence to dietary counselling, and contributing factors at public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. This was a facility-based cross-sectional study among 602 patients with Type 2 diabetes in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from July to August 2019. Patients were selected randomly after the total number of samples was proportionally allocated to four public hospitals. Relevant information was collected by trained data collectors using a pre-tested questionnaire. Data were entered into Epi-info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 24 for data analysis. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with adherence to dietary counselling. The proportion of nonadherence to dietary counselling among patients with type 2 diabetes was 67.3% (95%CI: 63.5%-71.1%). Nearly half (50.7%) of the respondents were food insecure. Of these, mildly food insecure, moderately food insecure, and severely food insecure were 8.5%, 29.2%, and 13%, respectively. Physical activity (AOR = 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1-2.9); diabetes knowledge (AOR = 1.8; 95%CI: 1.2-2.6); lack of access to information (AOR = 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1-2.6); moderately food insecure (AOR = 2.2; 95%CI: 1.3-3.7); and severely food insecure (AOR = 5.6; 95%CI: 2.1-15.0) were the major significant factors associated with nonadherence to dietary counselling. Over two-thirds of patients with diabetes did not adhere to dietary counselling, which appears high. As a result, improving diabetes education, information access, and food security status should be considered to ensure dietary counselling adherence among type 2 diabetes patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Even though adherence to dietary counselling for patients with diabetes is essential for improving health and preventing complications, access to an adequate and quality diet is challenging for patients living in a food-insecure household. The availability of data in this regard is limited in Ethiopia. Thus, this study assessed the food security status of patients with type 2 diabetes, their adherence to dietary counselling, and contributing factors at public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
METHODS
This was a facility-based cross-sectional study among 602 patients with Type 2 diabetes in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from July to August 2019. Patients were selected randomly after the total number of samples was proportionally allocated to four public hospitals. Relevant information was collected by trained data collectors using a pre-tested questionnaire. Data were entered into Epi-info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 24 for data analysis. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with adherence to dietary counselling.
RESULT
The proportion of nonadherence to dietary counselling among patients with type 2 diabetes was 67.3% (95%CI: 63.5%-71.1%). Nearly half (50.7%) of the respondents were food insecure. Of these, mildly food insecure, moderately food insecure, and severely food insecure were 8.5%, 29.2%, and 13%, respectively. Physical activity (AOR = 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1-2.9); diabetes knowledge (AOR = 1.8; 95%CI: 1.2-2.6); lack of access to information (AOR = 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1-2.6); moderately food insecure (AOR = 2.2; 95%CI: 1.3-3.7); and severely food insecure (AOR = 5.6; 95%CI: 2.1-15.0) were the major significant factors associated with nonadherence to dietary counselling.
CONCLUSION
Over two-thirds of patients with diabetes did not adhere to dietary counselling, which appears high. As a result, improving diabetes education, information access, and food security status should be considered to ensure dietary counselling adherence among type 2 diabetes patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35421127
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265523
pii: PONE-D-20-23320
pmc: PMC9009691
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0265523Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1204-6
pubmed: 21747017
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;117(10):1659-1679
pubmed: 28533169
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):65-71
pubmed: 28539866
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Mar 15;13:395-407
pubmed: 30936685
Springerplus. 2015 Jan 13;4:15
pubmed: 25635244
Fam Pract. 2011 Feb;28(1):82-7
pubmed: 21047940
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Feb;11(2):479-494
pubmed: 31916213
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Sep;110(9):1368-77
pubmed: 20821887
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(3):
pubmed: 32019083
World J Diabetes. 2014 Aug 15;5(4):444-70
pubmed: 25126392
Diabet Med. 2014 Dec;31(12):1610-4
pubmed: 24890340
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Mar 05;29:144
pubmed: 30050608
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;33(2):157-170
pubmed: 29302846
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):434
pubmed: 29970150
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Oct 24;7:758
pubmed: 25344089
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70
pubmed: 30559232
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jul 26;33:260
pubmed: 31692826
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Nov 29;4:21
pubmed: 30519484
Curr Nutr Rep. 2014;3(4):324-332
pubmed: 25383254
Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:1615735
pubmed: 28044077
J Urban Health. 2017 Feb;94(1):87-99
pubmed: 28097614
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014 Nov 21;7:533-42
pubmed: 25473293
BMC Endocr Disord. 2016 May 31;16(1):28
pubmed: 27381349
Springerplus. 2015 Jun 20;4:284
pubmed: 26101736
Diabet Med. 2013 Jun;30(6):e215-22
pubmed: 23506405
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Nov 03;13:4123-4129
pubmed: 33177852
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016 Sep 2;106(5):352-356
pubmed: 27762618
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2109542
pubmed: 28090538
Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2587-92
pubmed: 24969578
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014 Mar 04;13(1):39
pubmed: 24593904
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017 Sep 20;9(1):e1-e7
pubmed: 29041795
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 10;10(1):381
pubmed: 28797280
Public Health Action. 2015 Mar 21;5(1):74-8
pubmed: 26400605
Int J Endocrinol. 2020 Feb 28;2020:1512376
pubmed: 32190048
Endocrinol Nutr. 2016 May;63(5):202-11
pubmed: 27012228
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2012 Fall;73(3):e261-6
pubmed: 22958632
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Jun;42(3):257-262
pubmed: 28797890
Diabet Med. 2011 Mar;28(3):306-10
pubmed: 21309839
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2010 Dec;10(3):341-9
pubmed: 21509254
PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0194819
pubmed: 29742131