Durability and Moisture Dynamics of Douglas-Fir Wood From Slovenia.

extractives natural durability water exclusion efficacy wood wood decay

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 23 01 2022
accepted: 10 03 2022
entrez: 15 4 2022
pubmed: 16 4 2022
medline: 16 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wood in outdoor applications is subject to various decomposition factors. Wood degradation can be prevented by construction details, biocide protection of wood, wood modification or selection of naturally durable species. Unfortunately, most species in Europe do not have naturally durable wood. Imported tree species represent a new pool from which we can draw wood species with better natural durability and better resilience towards climate change. The performance of wood when used outdoors depends on the biologically active compounds (extractives) and the water exclusion efficacy. Considering decay, presence of biologically active compounds and water exclusion efficacy, we can estimate the density, modulus of elasticity, extractive content and resistance dose, which reflects the material properties of wood. Recently, the most commonly used model for this purpose is Meyer-Veltrup. Literature data indicate that the durability of the wood from native and new sites is not always comparable, so it is necessary to determine the resistance of non-native wood species from new sites. This paper presents original data on the wood's overall durability from American Douglas fir (

Identifiants

pubmed: 35422821
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.860734
pmc: PMC9002177
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

860734

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Humar, Vek, Oven, Lesar, Kržišnik, Keržič, Hočevar and Brus.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Plant Sci. 2015 Sep 10;6:730
pubmed: 26442044
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1150-1163
pubmed: 28991410
J Chromatogr A. 2006 Apr 21;1112(1-2):64-77
pubmed: 16356507
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Sep 01;12:702442
pubmed: 34539695
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Apr 10;115(2):235-43
pubmed: 17188387
Tree Physiol. 2012 Feb;32(2):178-87
pubmed: 22363071
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;31(3):137-47
pubmed: 15112061
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Dec 17;51(26):7600-6
pubmed: 14664514

Auteurs

Miha Humar (M)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Viljem Vek (V)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Primož Oven (P)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Boštjan Lesar (B)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Davor Kržišnik (D)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Eli Keržič (E)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Miha Hočevar (M)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Robert Brus (R)

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Classifications MeSH