Blastocyst versus cleavage embryo transfer improves cumulative live birth rates, time and cost in oocyte recipients: a randomized controlled trial.

Blastocyst stage embryo transfer (D5) Cleavage stage embryo transfer (D3) Cumulative live birth rate Oocyte donation Time to live birth

Journal

Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN: 1472-6491
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Online
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101122473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 15 09 2021
revised: 17 12 2021
accepted: 05 01 2022
pubmed: 18 4 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
entrez: 17 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Does embryo transfer day (day 5 versus day 3) affect cumulative live birth rates (CLBR), time to live birth (TLB) and cost per live birth (CPL) in recipients of donated oocytes? A single-centre RCT conducted between April 2017 and August 2018. Recipients of donated oocytes were randomized to cleavage-stage (day 3) or to blastocyst-stage (day 5) embryo transfer. Eligible recipients were aged 18-50 years and in their first or second synchronous cycle. Primary outcome was CLBR (12 months from first embryo transfer), and fresh and subsequent cryopreserved transfers were considered; TLB and CPL were also analysed. Recipients (n = 134) were randomized to the day-3 group (n = 69) or to the day-5 group (n = 65). Day-5 transfer resulted in a 15.9% relative increase in CLBR and a significant shorter TLB compared with day-3 transfer. To reach a 50% CLBR, the day-3 group required 6 months more than the day-5 group (15.3 versus 8.9 months, respectively). The average CPL in the day-3 strategy cost 24% more than the day-5 strategy (€14817.10 versus €10959.20). Clinical pregnancy rate was 25% less in the day-3 group. The trial was prematurely stopped after poor initial results in the day-3 arm led to unplanned interim analysis. The transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos in recipients of donated oocytes is preferred as it leads to a higher clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, shorter time to pregnancy and lower costs to achieve live birth, compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35430119
pii: S1472-6483(22)00028-1
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

995-1004

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Elisabet Clua (E)

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: eliclu@dexeus.com.

Ignacio Rodríguez (I)

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Gemma Arroyo (G)

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Annalisa Racca (A)

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Francisca Martínez (F)

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Nikolaos P Polyzos (NP)

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH